Rubio votes for CR: Cruz, Paul vote 'no'

Sen. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioCongress faces growing health care crisis in Puerto Rico The Hill's 12:30 Report Colbert mocks Trump for sipping water during speech on Asia trip MORE (R-Fla.) on Thursday voted in favor of a spending bill that includes an authorization to aid Syrian rebels, while Sens. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulCongress must end American support for Saudi war in Yemen Black men get longer prison sentences than white men for same crimes: study Sarah Palin on sexual harassment: 'People know I'm probably packing' so they 'don't mess with me' MORE (R-Ky.) and Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzTexas Republicans slam White House over disaster relief request Dem rep: Trump disaster aid request is 'how you let America down again' Moore endorsements disappear from campaign website MORE (R-Texas) voted against it.

The plan to train and equip moderate Syrian rebels is the next stage in President Obama’s plan to defeat the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

ADVERTISEMENT
Administration officials have predicted the war against ISIS will last into at least the next presidential administration, and therefore the senators’ votes could come under scrutiny if they run for president in 2016. Rubio, Cruz and Paul have all expressed interest in possible presidential bids.

The Senate passed the continuing resolution (CR) 78-22, with 12 Republicans, 9 Democrats and 1 independent voting against it.

Rubio, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has long called on the administration to arm the moderate opposition in Syria, a step that President Obama asked Congress to authorize in a stopgap spending bill last week.

"What happens in Syria is in our national interests," Rubio said earlier in the day. "If we do not confront and defeat ISIL now, we will have to do so later. ... If we fail to approve this, the nations of that region will say America is not truly engaged.

"I will support this resolution because I think it is in the best interest of our nation,” he added.

The House approved that authorization in a separate 273-156 vote before the lower chamber passed the CR on Wednesday.

Until now, the U.S. is believed to have been aiding the rebels covertly.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), another member of the Foreign Relations Committee, has walked a fine line between opposing intervention in foreign affairs and advocating the use of force.

On the plan to arm Syrian rebels, for instance, Paul said earlier this summer that ISIS has largely gained strength because the U.S. has armed the group’s allies in Syria.

Before the Thursday vote, Paul asked to separate the authorization to aid Syrian rebels from the CR, but Senate Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Barbara MikulskiBarbara MikulskiClinton: White House slow-walking Russia sanctions Top Lobbyists 2017: Hired Guns Gore wishes Mikulski a happy birthday at 'Inconvenient Sequel' premiere MORE (D-Md.) objected. 

"The inescapable irony is that someday the arms we supply would be used against us, or Israel," Paul said on the floor Thursday. "It is also ludicrous to believe that we know where all of the money, arms and ammunition will end up, or who will end up benefiting from these shipments."

Cruz, a member of the Tea Party, has echoed Paul’s argument that weapons given to rebels could wind up in hands of terrorist groups in Syria.

All three have voiced support for using U.S. airstrikes against ISIS, on which Paul and Cruz have said Congress should hold a vote. Rubio has stated Obama already has the constitutional authority to order airstrikes.

Congressional leaders said this week lawmakers will likely debate whether to give President Obama that authority in the lame-duck session after the midterm elections.

The president has so far not made that request and administration officials have suggested Obama doesn’t need congressional authority.