McConnell's NSA gambit fails

Greg Nash

Mitch McConnellMitch McConnellTrump hits Kaine on TPP: He supports a 'job killer' Clinton maps out first 100 days Why a bill about catfish will show whether Ryan's serious about regulatory reform MORE staged an epic gamble over U.S. spying powers — and lost.

The Republican leader pledged to keep senators in Washington through the weekend to finish work on expiring provisions of the Patriot Act, but Sen. Rand PaulRand PaulWhat to watch for on Day 2 at the GOP convention Cyber squatters sitting on valuable VP web addresses Majority of GOP senators to attend Trump convention MORE (R-Ky.) called his bluff.

Instead, when the smoke cleared in the early hours of Saturday morning, the 2016 presidential contender was the one with bragging rights.

ADVERTISEMENT
The battle between the two Kentucky Republicans spilled over on the Senate floor, with Paul using procedural tactics to force the chamber into an early Saturday vote. He then used his leverage to kill off McConnell’s repeated attempts to reauthorize the expiring National Security Agency (NSA) programs — first for two months, then for eight days, then for five, then three, then two.

McConnell and the Republican leadership team had appeared confident even into Friday evening that they could kill the House-passed USA Freedom Act. They had planned to force the Senate into accepting a “clean” reauthorization of the provisions — set to expire at the end of the month — at least for a short while. 

But Paul and other opponents of the “clean” renewal held firm, forcing McConnell to kick the can and adjourn the Senate without a clear path forward on how to prevent a shutdown of the NSA programs. 

Leaving the Capitol, Republicans seemed confused on what their leader’s next steps would be.

“That's a really good question,” Sen. Mike LeeMike LeeObama signs opioid bill Thiel said to explain support for Trump in convention speech Convention erupts at Cruz snub MORE (R-Utah) said, when asked what would change between Saturday and when senators return to Washington for a rare Sunday session on May 31.

Sen. John McCainJohn McCainFox News bests major networks in convention ratings Meghan McCain: ‘I no longer recognize my party’ Why a bill about catfish will show whether Ryan's serious about regulatory reform MORE (R-Ariz.) seemed equally unsure if Paul would accept a deal before returning to Washington.

“I don’t know. I don’t know. I don’t know. They march to a different drum,” the Armed Services Committee chairman said, adding that he was sure Paul’s tactics were “a great revenue raiser.”

Even Paul himself appeared non-committal on whether or not he would accept a deal.

“We'll see,” he told reporters as he left the Capitol. "It depends, sometimes things change as deadlines approach."

The junior senator from Kentucky wants votes on two amendments, and said that he didn’t understand why McConnell wouldn't let them pass by a simple majority threshold.

Supporters of the USA Freedom Act appeared bolstered by the amount of support the House-passed legislation received, coming three votes shy of the 60 needed to overcome a procedural hurdle.

Lee said he suspects McConnell will try to work out a deal over the recess, adding that “I hope that whatever that is, is going to be built on… the House-passed USA Freedom Act.”

Sen. Ted CruzTed CruzKasich leaves door open to Trump endorsement Instead of being bold, Clinton errs in picking Kaine Pro-LGBT push underscores GOP convention MORE, who is competing against Paul for his party’s presidential nomination, said he was “hopeful” that McConnell would see the light on the reform bill, which passed the lower chamber in an overwhelming 338-88 vote.

"Sometimes the Senate takes some time for debate and consideration,” the Texas Republican said. “I think we'll take a week and come back and cooler heads will prevail."

Cruz, while acknowledging that he disagreed with Paul, refused to criticize his hardball tactics, saying that he’s “a big fan” of the libertarian favorite.

McConnell didn’t respond to a barrage of questions from reporters as he left the Capitol, and has given no sign of what his next step would be.

McConnell and Paul have been allies of late. Paul endorsed McConnell last year in his reelection bid, and McConnell is backing Paul's White House run.

But the Republican leader appeared to be caught off guard by his fellow Kentuckian’s resolve, and had previously brushed aside Paul’s filibuster threat.

“Well, ya know, everybody threatens to filibuster. We’ll see what happens,” McConnell told ABC’s “This Week.” “This is the security of the country we’re talking about here. This is no small matter. We see it on display on almost a weekly basis.”

Sen. John CornynJohn CornynGOP senators to donors: Stick with us regardless of Trump Hopes dim for mental health deal Overnight Finance: Senate punts on Zika funding | House panel clears final spending bill | Biz groups press Treasury on tax rules | Obama trade rep confident Pacific deal passes this year MORE (Texas), the Republican whip, suggested that Republicans would be able to find a way out of the current standstill, telling reporters after the votes that, "yeah, we'll fix it. I am confident."

Even with path to a deal unclear, the spy brawl had one clear winner — Paul's political ambitions.

He has staked much of his presidential campaign on his civil libertarian bone fides. The stalemate, as well as his filibuster earlier this week, has helped him, and his presidential campaign, dominate the media this week.

Paul showed no sign early Saturday morning of letting go of that spotlight.

“The Senate has refused to reauthorize bulk data collection. I am proud to have stood up for the Bill of Rights,” he tweeted from his campaign’s account on Saturday. “But our fight is not over.”

“The Senate will return one week from Sunday,” he added. “With your help we can end illegal NSA spying once and for all.”

But he also flatly rejected that his hardline on the Patriot Act provisions was part of a campaign stunt, telling reporters, “I think people don’t really question my sincerity.”