A fight over raising taxes has bloomed as the chief obstacle to passing a desperately needed multi-year transportation bill by the end of next month, raising the specter of a possible shutdown of highway programs.
Senate Finance Committee Orrin HatchOrrin HatchWhat if there’s no 'Nuclear Option' in the Senate? Senate votes to eliminate Obama-era retirement rule Battle over tech patents spills into Supreme Court MORE (R-Utah), who is tasked with finding a way to pay for a multi-year deal, has ruled out the prospect of raising taxes, putting him on a collision course with Democrats.
Senate Democratic leaders have called for a six-year, $478 billion transportation bill paid largely by taxing overseas corporate profits.
They warn it would be "very hard" for them to accept another short-term extension of highway funds after having done so 33 times.
A bipartisan group of senators, including Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Jim InhofeJames InhofeOptimism rising for infrastructure deal Repeal of Obama drilling rule stalls in the Senate GOP senator: EPA 'brainwashing our kids' MORE (R-Okla.), and Sen. Barbara BoxerBarbara BoxerAnother day, another dollar for retirement advice rip-offs Carly Fiorina 'certainly looking at' Virginia Senate run Top Obama adviser signs with Hollywood talent agency: report MORE (Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the panel, have proposed a less ambition six-year, $275 billion highway bill.
But Inhofe and Boxer are leaving it up to the Finance Committee to find a way to pay for a $90 billion funding shortfall not covered by federal gasoline and diesel taxes.
Lawmakers will have four weeks to solve the impasse before the Highway Trust Fund runs out of money on July 31.
The battle over tax increases will return to the forefront when lawmakers get back from the Fourth of July recess, now that the trade debate — which consumed May and June — is finally over.
“We hope we can get the highway bill done before the end of July,” Hatch told reporters but he identified the funding shortfall as a major obstacle.
He says a three- or four-year transportation bill is more realistic than the six-year proposals put forth by the president and Senate colleagues.
“I know one thing. It’s pretty tough to go six years. Six years is $92 to $94 billion,” he said.
“I hope it’s a multi-year, that’s all I can say, and I’m going to make it as long as we can,” he added.
Senate Democratic leaders are pushing the six-year transportation plan included in President Obama’s budget, which calls for $317 billion in spending on roads and $143 billion on federal transit projects.
They want to pay for it by requiring U.S. corporations to repatriate overseas profits at a 14 percent tax rate, which would raise $238 billion in revenue, and tax future foreign earnings at 19 percent.
“We're asking them for their proposal. Here's ours, what's yours? Let's not wait to get to that deadline again and do a short- term funding plan number 34,” said New York Sen. Charles SchumerCharles SchumerWith Freedom Caucus dig, Trump masters the media ... again Pence casts tiebreaking Senate procedural vote on funding for abortion providers Senate seen as starting point for Trump’s infrastructure plan MORE, who is leading the Democratic messaging strategy in the transportation fight.
Senate Democratic leaders say the six-year, $275 billion bill sponsored by Inhofe and Boxer, which the Environment and Public Works Committee passed last week, does not go far enough.
“It's a step in the right direction because it's long term and it does increase funding, but not by enough to meet our needs and what Democrats would prefer,” said a Democratic leadership aide.
Sens. David VitterDavid VitterFormer GOP rep joins K Street lobbying firm Capitol Counsel Lobbying World Mercury brings on former Sen. Vitter, two others MORE (R-La.) and Tom CarperTom CarperEPA mistakenly criticizes Trump’s executive order Dem leaders give centrists space on Gorsuch Members help package meals at Kraft Heinz charity event in DC MORE (D-Del.) are cosponsors of the measure.
Republicans want to pass a multi-year transportation bill, but a schism has emerged within their conference over the thorny question of whether they should raise some taxes to pay for it.
Republican Sen. Bob CorkerBob CorkerThe Hill's 12:30 Report After repeal failure, GOP senators propose ObamaCare subsidy patch Top GOP senator rips Ryan for rejecting bipartisan outreach MORE (Tenn.) has called for increasing federal taxes on gasoline and diesel by 12 cents over two years and indexing it to inflation.
The gas tax now stands at 18.4 cents per gallon while the tax on diesel is 24.4 cents per gallon.
Inhofe and Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John ThuneJohn ThuneSenators move to bolster cyber resources for small businesses Optimism rising for infrastructure deal McConnell: ObamaCare 'status quo' will stay in place moving forward MORE (R-S.D.) have not ruled out increasing the gas tax.
“John Thune made the statement that ‘nothing is off the table,’ and I agree with his statement,” Inhofe told reporters earlier this year.
The Commerce panel is responsible for about $1 billion a year of the infrastructure budget, according to a Senate aide.
But any proposal to raise taxes would pick a fight with the conservative base led by Grover Norquist, the president of Americans for Tax Reform.
Norquist said Congress would have more funding for highway construction projects if it wipes out the federal requirement established by the Davis-Bacon Act to pay local prevailing wages.
"There is zero chance the Republican House and Senate will increase taxes. Highway spending is 25% above what is needed due to Davis-Bacon prevailing wage law…. eliminate that and your funding problem disappears,” he said in a statement to The Hill.
“No need to raise taxes. This was tried in Michigan and Massachusetts and defeated by a vote of the people," he added.
So far, Hatch is siding with Norquist and other anti-tax conservatives.
“We’re not willing to raise taxes,” he said. “I’m willing to look at everything but we’re not going to raise taxes to get there.”
Democrats believe, however, that House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul RyanPaul RyanPelosi fears GOP plans on 'sabotaging' ObamaCare Ryan: Trump 'very apologetic' after plugging critical Fox show Ryan says key ObamaCare payments will continue during House lawsuit MORE (R-Wis.) has signaled interest in paying for a multi-year transportation bill with corporate tax reform.
“Lots of other Republicans, including Paul Ryan, think international tax reforms that raise revenues are a good way to go. Democrats agree,” said a senior Democratic aide.
Ryan has opposed paying for increased transportation funding by taxing overseas profits because he wants to use the reservoir of funding for a broader tax reform initiative.
Earlier this month he downplayed the likelihood of a major tax reform package passing Congress this year.
House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said last month he is exploring options to pay for a multiyear infrastructure bill and acknowledged it would need to be partly funded with revenue increases.
Keith Laing contributed to this report.
Looming highway debate stirs tax fight
By Alexander Bolton - 06/28/15 06:00 AM EDT