Dems rally around Schumer despite Iran stance


Democratic senators say Sen. Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerOvernight Health Care: Schumer calls for tying ObamaCare fix to children's health insurance | Puerto Rico's water woes worsen | Dems plead for nursing home residents' right to sue Crying on TV doesn't qualify Kimmel to set nation's gun agenda Trump knocks ‘fake’ news coverage of his trip to Puerto Rico MORE’s opposition to President Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran won’t prevent him from becoming their next leader.

Even a potential rival to Schumer said Democratic senators who back the Iran deal will not turn on Schumer over the divisive vote.

“I don’t think the choice of the next Senate leader is going to be based on any single vote. Members of the caucus respect Chuck and know he’s gone through a thoughtful reflection. I don’t think it has any impact on the leadership race,” Senate Minority Whip Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinGun proposal picks up GOP support Durbin: I had 'nothing to do' with Curbelo snub Republicans jockey for position on immigration MORE (Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat, told The Hill in an interview.

Schumer’s decision to oppose Obama on Iran didn’t surprise Durbin, who was once seen as Schumer’s top rival to succeed retiring Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

“I can tell you that I know Chuck pretty well. I have listened to him carefully and heard his comments about the negotiations carefully,” Durbin said. “I always expected him to be against the agreement. This didn’t come as a major shock or surprise.”

Schumer’s decision has irritated the White House and enraged former aides to President Obama, who have launched a public attack on the powerful New York Democrat.

Former Obama advisor David Plouffe called Schumer naive in a message on Twitter after the senator urged Obama to go back to the negotiating table “to try to get a better deal.”

“Mitch McConnell will have a field day with this kind of naïveté. We will miss Harry Reid,” Plouffe tweeted, referring to the Senate GOP leader.

Another former senior Obama advisor, Dan Pfeiffer, tweeted last week that “Schumer siding with the GOP against Obama, Clinton, and most Democrats will make it hard for him to lead the Dems in ‘16.”

Activist liberal groups such as, Credo and Democracy for America, which raise millions of dollars from the grassroots, are furious with Schumer.

“If this is what counts as ‘leadership’ among Democrats in the Senate, Senate Democrats should be prepared to find a new leader or few followers,” Ilya Sheyman,’s executive director, fumed.   

In the Senate, however, Schumer has an enormous amount of good will from his colleagues. He built strong ties within the Democratic caucus after helping them win control of the Senate in 2006 and build a 60-vote supermajority in 2008 as a strategist and prolific fundraiser.

Even liberal senators who say Schumer is on the wrong side of the Iran debate are willing to give him a mulligan.

“I support Chuck for leader but I think he got this one wrong. That’s the way it goes. It’s a vote of conscience,” said Sen. Brian SchatzBrian Emanuel SchatzChris Murphy’s profile rises with gun tragedies Senators grill ex-Equifax CEO over stock sales Overnight Cybersecurity: Trump proclaims 'Cybersecurity Awareness Month' | Equifax missed chance to patch security flaw | Lawmakers await ex-CEO's testimony | SEC hack exposed personal data MORE (D-Hawaii), who plans to vote against a resolution disapproving the deal.

Sen. Jeanne ShaheenCynthia (Jeanne) Jeanne ShaheenHomeland Security searching some social media doesn't violate privacy The feds shouldn't blackball Kaspersky without public evidence Week ahead: Crunch time for defense bill’s cyber reforms | Equifax under scrutiny MORE (D-N.H.), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee who supports the agreement, said Democratic senators will not hold Schumer’s position against him.

“This is a difficult and consequential vote that each of us has to weigh individually. While Sen. Schumer and I may disagree on how best to thwart the Iran nuclear program, we don’t question each other’s motives and I think that is true across the Democratic caucus,” she said in a statement.

Democrats also predict Schumer’s opposition won’t sway too many of his colleagues.

Schumer has said he will not lobby other Democrats against the deal, and in favor of a resolution of disapproval that Republicans plan to bring to the floor next month.

“Chuck has been a strong progressive for a really long time and he’s got the total support of our caucus but that’s different from us following what he does on such weighty matters in lockstep,” Schatz said. “This is a tough issue for everybody but he’s been a strong progressive and a great Democrat for many, many years.”

The resolution of disapproval would kill the deal — but only if it survives a promised veto from Obama. That would take two-thirds majorities in both the House and Senate.

Schumer is the only Senate Democrat who is publicly against the deal so far, though many expect Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) to also vote against it.

Durbin — whose job as the second-ranking member of leadership was viewed as uncertain because of his rivalry with Schumer — has emerged as the primary driver of support for Obama’s Iran deal within the Senate Democratic caucus.

He has set up private meetings between wavering Democratic senators and senior administration officials and put together a 10-person whip team to address colleagues’ concerns over the agreement.

Eighteen Democratic senators are so far backing the deal, according to The Hill’s whip list.

Some of Schumer’s colleagues have come to his defense in the face of criticism from Team Obama and liberal groups.

Sen. Debbie StabenowDeborah (Debbie) Ann StabenowDems plan to make gun control an issue in Nevada Red-state Dems need more from Trump before tax embrace Stabenow: ‘Kid Rock might actually win the Republican primary’ MORE (D-Mich.), the vice chairwoman of the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee and a close ally of Schumer's, said the criticisms from former White House officials are “unfortunate.”

“He’s very, very respectful of the members of our caucus. I think this has zero effect on him being a leader or an effective leader. And I think it’s very unfortunate to see the comments coming from people connected with the White House,” she said.

Stabenow, who is undecided on how to vote, said Schumer’s stance would not sway her.

“I think everyone understands the situation that Sen. Schumer is in and who he represents,” she said, referring to his large pro-Israel constituency in New York City. “People were not surprised. He’s a very thoughtful person. He also understands this is something everyone needs to grapple with in terms of their own conscience.”