GOP searches for ObamaCare win

Greg Nash

Senate Republicans are plunging into a difficult debate over ­ObamaCare as they seek to take up legislation before the Thanksgiving holiday that would repeal most of President Obama’s ­signature law.

The fight puts Majority Leader Mitch McConnellMitch McConnellOvernight Healthcare: House loosens pesticide rules to fight Zika | A GOP bill that keeps some of ObamaCare | More proof of pending premium hikes Senate votes to block financial adviser rule Reid defends embattled VA secretary MORE (R-Ky.) in a difficult spot, between conservatives who are eager to send the repeal bill to the White House and centrists — including a senator vulnerable in 2016 — who are ready to defect over language in the House-approved bill.

ADVERTISEMENT
House Republicans have already passed a reconciliation bill that would repeal parts of the healthcare reform law and are eager to see the legislation reach Obama’s desk ahead of the 2016 elections.

But Senate Republican sources say the House bill cannot pass the upper chamber without significant changes, with McConnell short of the votes he needs.

“The House opted to go a certain way. We don’t have to go that way. We have members here who may have different views on things,” said a senior Senate Republican aide. “If it’s not the exact same as what the House did, that’s OK.”

The reconciliation process allows Senate Republicans to bypass a Democratic filibuster. GOP leaders earlier this year promised the tactic would be used to get an ­ObamaCare repeal bill through Congress, forcing the president to defend the law with a veto.

But the package passed by the House has created two problems for McConnell.

For one, a pair of presidential hopefuls, Sens. Ted CruzTed CruzTrump wins Washington state primary Overnight Cybersecurity: House to offer bill on government hacking powers Overnight Tech: Rubio, Cruz take up internet domain fight MORE (R-Texas) and Marco RubioMarco RubioNew Mexico GOP gov. won’t attend home-state Trump rally Rubio: 'It’s not that we lost, it’s that Donald Trump won’ Santorum endorses Trump after 'long heart-to-heart' MORE (R-Fla.), joined by Sen. Mike LeeMike LeeSenate set for showdown over women in the draft Overnight Finance: Path clears for Puerto Rico bill | GOP senator casts doubt on IRS impeachment | Senate approves .1B for Zika Overnight Tech: Trade groups press NC on bathroom law MORE (R-Utah), are vowing to oppose any bill that stops short of repealing the Affordable Care Act in its entirety — something that could be exceedingly difficult to accomplish under reconciliation rules.

“Each of us campaigned on a promise to fully repeal ObamaCare and a reconciliation bill is the best way to send such legislation to President Obama’s desk,” Cruz, Rubio and Lee said in a statement. 

“If this bill cannot be amended so that it fully repeals ­ObamaCare pursuant to Senate rules, we cannot support this bill.”

Without those three votes, McConnell would have just a bare majority of 51 for the reconciliation package — but that’s only if he can hold the rest of his conference together.

Several Republican centrists are already on record opposing the defunding of Planned Parenthood, a key piece of the House package that was included to win over conservatives.

GOP Sens. Mark KirkMark KirkVA chief 'deeply' regrets if Disney comment offended vets Senate GOP gears up for fight over Gitmo transfers Duckworth: VA secretary's Disneyland comment 'tone-deaf' MORE (Ill.), Susan CollinsSusan CollinsGOP lawmaker: 'Republicans were wrong’ to block Garland Senate passes broad spending bill with .1B in Zika funds Senators unveil bill to overhaul apprenticeship programs MORE (Maine), Lisa MurkowskiLisa MurkowskiOvernight Energy: Lawmakers closing in on chemical safety deal GOP chair pushes Obama official on Arctic drilling plan McConnell touts 'Senate squad' in Wes Anderson-style video MORE (Alaska) and Kelly AyotteKelly AyotteVA secretary comes under fire for comparing wait times to Disneyland Juan Williams: Electoral map looks grim for Trump Liberal super-PAC hits Johnson for supporting Trump MORE (N.H.) have all either voted against efforts to defund Planned Parenthood or stated they opposed them. Kirk is considered one of the most vulnerable Senate incumbents in the country this cycle.

The tug-of-war between centrists and White House hopefuls means November will be a tough month for the Senate majority leader, after having dodged the bullet of a federal default and government shutdown with the October budget deal.

“If you move it to the right to placate those guys running for president, you make it a worse vote for people running in purple and blue states in 2016. McConnell’s between a rock and a hard place,” said a Senate Democratic leadership aide.  

Changing the legislation could be contingent on favorable rulings from Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, who will decide whether provisions in the legislation conform to the rules of reconciliation.

Some Senate conservatives are pushing for their chamber’s reconciliation package to include a one-sentence repeal of the entire law, but there’s an internal argument over whether such a blanket move would pass the procedural litmus test known as the Byrd Rule.

The Senate parliamentarian has provided early indications that the entire healthcare law — including parts that do not directly affect the deficit, such as the requirement that young adults be allowed to stay on their parents’ health plans until age 26 — cannot be repealed through reconciliation.

But she has not delivered a final judgment on the matter after hearing arguments from all sides, according to Senate sources.

The parliamentarian’s rulings could generate significant controversy, especially if Republicans are thwarted in their attempts to roll back parts of the law. 

Cruz earlier this month said Republicans should not let the parliamentarian stand in the way of getting rid of ObamaCare.

“At the end of the day, the Senate parliamentarian is an employee of the Senate. Virtually every Republican campaigned promising full repeal,” the Texan said.

The House reconciliation bill takes a targeted approach to repeal, abolishing the employer and individual mandates for insurance as well as the “Cadillac tax” on expensive employer-provided health plans. The House bill also repeals the law’s excise tax on medical devices.

But Senate conservatives complain that it leaves the core of ObamaCare — primarily its hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies — intact, as well as many of the law’s new taxes.   

“Many of the ObamaCare tax increases aren’t included in the House bill,” said one Senate aide. “It doesn’t include a repeal of the Medicaid expansion or the subsidies provided by the healthcare exchanges, which are certainly reconcilable.”

But repealing the subsidies, which help offset the cost of insurance for people under certain income limits, could be a tough vote for endangered Republican incumbents in battleground states.

Vulnerable members could also balk at rolling back some popular parts of the healthcare law, including the ban on insurers denying people for pre-existing conditions and the provision that allows young adults to stay on their parents’ plans until age 26.

“Why in the world are we here on the floor of the House of Representatives passing legislation that’s going to take away affordable healthcare to 15 million Americans, including 3 million children?” Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who is also running for Senate, said when the reconciliation bill passed the House last month.