Leahy: Border security measure reads 'like a Christmas wish list for Halliburton'

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick LeahyPatrick LeahyKey GOP chairman calls for 'robust review' of AT&T-Time Warner deal Dem asks for 'highest level of scrutiny' on AT&T-Time Warner deal Report: Investor visa program mainly funds wealthy areas MORE (D-Vt.) has panned a proposal to fast-track billions of dollars in spending on border security as a boondoggle for government contractors.

Leahy said a proposal drafted by Sens. Bob CorkerBob CorkerGlobal climate pact may bump into Senate roadblock GOP senators avoid Trump questions on rigged election Trump appoints fundraiser to national security advisory council MORE (R-Tenn.) and John HoevenJohn HoevenGOP senators avoid Trump questions on rigged election Overnight Defense: White House threatens to veto Gitmo bill GOP senators fight female draft in defense bill MORE (R-N.D.) “reads like a Christmas wish list for Halliburton.” 

The amendment requires implementation and activation of $4.5 billion in technology and equipment to achieve full surveillance of the U.S.-Mexico border.

“I am sure there are federal contracting firms high-fiving at the prospect of all of the spending demanded by some of our friends on the other side in this amendment,” Leahy said on the Senate floor.

Leahy criticized the GOP-sponsored language for waiving standard federal contracting rules.

“That is a potential we must watch out for — for waste and fraud,” he said.

He said colleagues have failed to learn the lessons learned in Iraq and Afghanistan, where the federal government spent tens of billions of dollars on contracts and projects with little oversight.

He said the border security provisions would require aggressive oversight from the Congress and the inspector general of the Department of Homeland Security.

Corker and Hoeven estimate their amendment will cost roughly $30 billion over ten years. It funds the implementation costs by raising fees on legal immigration.

“I think we hear too much about spending money on one border rather than coming up with a comprehensive solution that takes pressure off that border,” Leahy said. “This package is border security on steroids.”