Dems get testy twice with Trump Homeland Security chief

Dems get testy twice with Trump Homeland Security chief
© Greg Nash

Senior Senate Democrats had two testy exchanges with Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen NielsenKirstjen Michele NielsenCybersecurity: Cause for optimism, need for continued vigilance The Hill's Morning Report — Dems split on key issues but united against Trump Hillicon Valley: Trump revokes Brennan's security clearance | Twitter cracks down on InfoWars | AT&T hit with crypto lawsuit | DHS hosts election security exercise MORE during a contentious hearing Tuesday that touched on President TrumpDonald John TrumpWhite House counsel called Trump 'King Kong' behind his back: report Trump stays out of Arizona's ugly and costly GOP fight Trump claims he instructed White House counsel to cooperate with Mueller MORE’s travel ban.

The first came when Sen. Patrick LeahyPatrick Joseph LeahyDemocrats question if Kavanaugh lied about work on terrorism policy Senate returns to work on toughest 'minibus' yet GOP senator: Trump is ‘the only one in the government’ not paying attention to Russian threat to midterms MORE (D-Vt.), the ranking member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, accused Nielsen of failing to follow up as promised to questions about a controversial report asserting that the 402 of 549 people convicted of international terrorism in the U.S. were foreign-born.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s been four months, even though you stated you would get back to me, so let me try again,” Leahy began, before diving into questions about the report.

After Nielsen reiterated a commitment to follow up with him, Leahy interrupted her:

“Oh come on. It’s been months and months and months,” he said. 

Nielsen said she did not have data on how many of the 402 foreign-born persons in the Homeland Security report came from countries listed in President Trump’s travel ban, nor how many came to the United States through the diversity visa lottery, which the Trump administration has framed as a security threat. 

“I do not have that information with me today, sir,” Nielsen said.

She also did not have information on how many of the people in question were extradited from abroad specifically to undergo trial in the United States, which led to criticism from Leahy.

“These facts are still on the White House website,” he said. “There doesn’t seem to be any backup for them. But it becomes what our policy is made on. I could make any policy if I just want to make up the facts.”

The second clash came when Sen. Patty MurrayPatricia (Patty) Lynn MurrayGOP leader criticizes Republican senators for not showing up to work Senate Dems press Sessions for records on racial discrimination complaints Dem senators introduce resolution calling on Trump to stop attacking the press MORE (D-Wash.) pressed Nielsen over increased detentions for asylum-seekers who crossed the border illegally.

Murray was concerned specifically with pregnant women seeking asylum. She said groups like the American Pediatrics Association have raised concerns over whether detention centers are safe for expectant mothers and their children. 

“When your department is doing something that is wrong and misguided, and in my opinion cruel and an embarrassment to our country, I think it’s wrong, and I urge you to reverse course on this,” Murray said.

Nielsen said the detention centers provide prenatal care, separate housing, specialists and take detainees to appointments.

“I will say the reason they’re detained is because they illegally crossed our border,” said Nielsen.

“If they went to a port of entry, that would not be a crime,” she added, sparking an incredulous response from Murray asking if she was trying to discourage pregnant women from seeking asylum.

“No, I’m trying to discourage them from breaking the law. If they come through a port of entry, they have not broken the law, they can make their asylum claim,” Nielsen said.

Murray shot back: “But to put them in a detention center, that is inhumane.”

The two continued talking over each other before Murray, citing limited time, said they would have to disagree and moved on to questions about the annual cost of detentions, which she said was quadruple the amount per detainee than the federal government spends on education per student.