Senate GOP tries to defuse Trump border crisis

Senate GOP tries to defuse Trump border crisis
© Greg Nash

Senate Republicans on Tuesday moved to end a political crisis inflicted on the party by President TrumpDonald John TrumpArizona GOP Senate candidate defends bus tour with far-right activist Alyssa Milano protests Kavanaugh in 'Handmaid's Tale' costume Bomb in deadly Yemen school bus attack was manufactured by US firm: report MORE by voicing support for an immigration bill that would end the separation of children from their parents and guardians at the border.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTrump stays out of Arizona's ugly and costly GOP fight Sen. Warner to introduce amendment limiting Trump’s ability to revoke security clearances The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE (R-Ky.) said Republicans need to fix the problem through legislation, and that the fix should be narrowly tailored.


“My assumption is in order to fix this problem you can’t fix all the problems,” he told reporters.

He also noted pointedly that “all of the members of the Republican conference” support a plan that would keep children with their families, underlining the strong opposition among GOP senators to Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy, which has resulted in children being taken from their parents.

“We need to fix the problem and it requires a legislative solution,” McConnell said during his regular Tuesday afternoon appearance before reporters — and just an hour or so after a defiant Trump showed no signs of backing down during a fiery speech.

Lawmakers in both parties, along with conservatives in the media and business, have panned the Trump policy for separating families, which has created campaign fodder for Democrats.

The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board on Tuesday said the policy risked losing Republicans their majorities in the House and Senate, underscoring how the crisis has unnerved conservatives ahead of the midterm elections.

McConnell’s support for a narrow bill is telling given work by House Republicans on a broader measure.

The legislation in the House, a compromise between GOP centrists and conservatives, would stop the Department of Homeland Security from separating parents from their children. But it also includes border security measures, funding for Trump’s wall on the border and language that would allow “Dreamers” who came to the United States illegally as children to remain in the country.

It faces a difficult road in the House, and would almost certainly be dead on arrival in the Senate, where it would need support from Democrats to overcome a filibuster.

The House is expected to vote on the compromise legislation and a more hard-line bill on Thursday.

If the bills fail to pass, it could give leverage to a narrow Senate bill, though that legislation would also face questions.

Democrats argue, accurately, that Trump could end the separation of families by giving an order from the White House.

While Trump has blamed Democrats for the issue, Attorney General Jeff SessionsJefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsSantorum: Mueller could avoid charges of McCarthyism by investigating DOJ, FBI 8,000 new ways the Trump administration is undermining immigration court independence Watergate's John Dean rips Trump: I doubt you have any idea what McGahn told Mueller MORE introduced the policy that led to the separation of families this spring. Previous administrations under former Presidents George W. Bush and Obama chose not to take the step of splitting parents from their children to deter illegal border crossings.

Democrats say the onus is on Trump to prevent immigrant children from being separated from their parents.

“There are so many obstacles to legislation,” Senate Democratic Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerTo make the House of Representatives work again, make it bigger Reforms can stop members of Congress from using their public office for private gain Election Countdown: GOP worries House majority endangered by top of ticket | Dems make history in Tuesday's primaries | Parties fight for Puerto Rican vote in Florida | GOP lawmakers plan 'Freedom Tour' MORE (N.Y.) told reporters Tuesday. “Legislation is not the way to go here when it’s so easy for the president to sign it.”

He argued any legislative fix would quickly become a magnet for “unacceptable additions,” such as proposals to toughen enforcement provisions.

But Schumer did not completely rule out Democratic support for a narrow bill.

Asked if his remarks meant Democrats would not support the bill favored by McConnell to keep immigrant families together while seeking asylum on the U.S. border, Schumer emphasized “the president can change it with his pen.”

Senate Republicans are discussing a bill being crafted by Republican Whip John CornynJohn CornynSen. Warner to introduce amendment limiting Trump’s ability to revoke security clearances Sentencing reform deal heats up, pitting Trump against reliable allies Rand Paul to ask Trump to lift sanctions on Russian leaders MORE (Texas) that would require families be kept together in a “humane setting” while waiting for a hearing with an immigration judge.

The proposal would also expedite hearings for those families to minimize their time in detention.

Other Republicans, such as Sens. Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzCruz calls out O'Rourke for supporting NFL players' protests during anthem Beto O’Rourke: Term limits can help keep politicians from turning into a--holes Election Countdown: GOP worries House majority endangered by top of ticket | Dems make history in Tuesday's primaries | Parties fight for Puerto Rican vote in Florida | GOP lawmakers plan 'Freedom Tour' MORE (Texas) and Tom CottonThomas (Tom) Bryant CottonSentencing reform deal heats up, pitting Trump against reliable allies The Hill's Morning Report: Dems have a majority in the Senate (this week) Cotton: Reducing mandatory minimum sentencing isn’t reform, it’s jailbreak MORE (Ark.), have their own proposals.

Cruz plans to introduce a bill this week that would double the number of federal immigration judges, authorize new shelters to keep families together and require the Department of Homeland Security to keep children with parents unless there are aggravated criminal charges.

Cotton wants to add language to an appropriations bill that would overturn the 1997 Flores settlement, which requires border agents to release children from detention after 20 days, and provide money for family housing units.

The more that is added to a bill, however, the more difficulty it could have picking up Democrats. And there’s no guarantee Democrats would back a bill that simply overturns Trump’s policy, though the chances could grow with the defeat of the House measures.

McConnell was careful to avoid criticizing Trump in his Tuesday remarks. He declined to say whether he spoke personally to Trump about the controversy or offer his personal thoughts on whether the administration should “pause” its policy, as Sen. Orrin HatchOrrin Grant HatchSentencing reform deal heats up, pitting Trump against reliable allies Dem lawmaker calls Trump racist in response to 'dog' comment PETA calls out Trump for attacking Omarosa as a 'dog' MORE (R-Utah) requested in a Tuesday letter to Sessions.

Other Republicans criticized Trump’s policy more directly.

“While I firmly support enforcing our immigration laws, I am against using parental separation as a deterrent to illegal immigration,” Sen. Pat RobertsCharles (Pat) Patrick RobertsThe farm bill gives Congress a chance to act on the Pet and Women Safety (PAWS) Act Kobach secures GOP nomination in hotly contested Kansas governor's race GOP senators surprised to attend Trump’s tariffs announcement MORE (Kan.), a senior Republican, tweeted on Monday.

In a speech to the National Federation of Independent Business, Trump was full of fury about the border. He blamed the “fake news” media for stirring up the controversy, saying it was aiding smugglers and human traffickers. He also said Mexico was not doing enough to stop illegal immigration.

The president said he wanted Congress to grant him “the legal authority to detain and properly remove families together as a unit,” and questioned the need for more judges to handle immigration cases, something supported by lawmakers in both parties and his own Justice Department.

“I don’t want judges,” he said. “I want border security. I don’t want to try people. I don’t want people coming in.”

Juliegrace Brufke and Jordain Carney contributed.