THE HILL
 

Dems ready to amend Baucus's health bill

By Jeffrey Young - 09/14/09 08:42 PM ET

Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee are poised to demand changes to the healthcare legislation being drafted by their chairman.


Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) plans to introduce his proposal for healthcare reform on Wednesday with a committee mark up to begin the following Tuesday. Based on the comments by several committee Democrats after a meeting Monday evening, that mark up could be a lengthy one.

Baucus acknowledged that the mark-up could prove a busy one but predicted that Democrats would support the package he plans to unveil Wednesday without major changes.

“I don’t see any deal-breaker amendments,” Baucus said. “Put it this way: It’s unlikely that any amendments, which basically change the framework, will be accepted.”

Near the top of the list for the panel’s Democrats is worry that health insurance subsidies will not be sufficiently generous nor available to enough people despite the fact that the bill would legally require most people to obtain coverage. Beyond premiums, some Democrats are concerned that Baucus’s proposal would not do enough to protect middle-class families from high healthcare expenses.

"It's very clear, at this point in the debate, the flashpoint is all about affordability,” said Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). “I personally think there’s a lot of heavy lifting left to do on the affordability issue.”

The healthcare bills already approved by three House committees and another Senate committee offer more generous subsidies – but at a higher cost to taxpayers.

“We’re doing our very best to make an insurance requirement as affordable as we possibly can, recognizing that we’re trying to get this bill under $900 billion total,” said Baucus, who has been courting Republican support for his measure in an attempt to guarantee that a healthcare bill can achieve the 60 votes or more needed to avoid a Senate filibuster.

“I’m going to work even harder to address any legitimate affordability concerns. I knew they were there,” Baucus said.

Baucus should expect to see many amendments from Democratic members of the committee, said Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.).

“There will undoubtedly be amendments in the committee process – and probably a lot of them,” Kerry said. “There’ll be some big fights over different components of this.”

Asked whether he could vote in favor of Baucus’s draft proposal that senators discussed in their meeting Monday evening, Kerry said: “I’m glad I don’t have to answer that because I know it’s not going to be the bill that we’re going to vote on because we are going to amend, we are going to have a tug-of-war still.”

Nevertheless, Kerry sounded an upbeat note about the prospects of healthcare reform passing the Senate. “Not everybody is going to like every aspect of it in the Senate but in the end I believe we will get something that addresses the needs and concerns of the American people.”

Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) also expressed confidence the Senate will come together on a bill. “I’m very optimistic that we’re going to be able to pass a bill that’ll get 60 votes,” he said.

President Barack Obama’s address to a joint session of Congress last week reassured Nelson that the large population of Medicare beneficiaries in his state would not be harmed by the legislation, he said.

Obama emphasized that point at a private meeting with centrist Democratic senators last week, according to Nelson. “I think that they’re going to address these concerns that I have not to take away things that senior citizens already have,” he said.

In addition to concerns about the subsidies and other issues, liberals are also upset that Baucus decided to omit a government-run public option insurance program from his bill, instead opting to embrace a proposal by Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) to create not-for-profit healthcare cooperatives that would compete with private insurers. Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) has been especially skeptical of this attempt to compromise with Republicans and centrist Democrats who oppose the public option.

Baucus has been negotiating since June with the “gang of six” Finance Committee senators, which includes Conrad, ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Democratic Sen. Jeff Bingaman (N.M.), and Republican Sens. Mike Enzi (Wyo.) and Olympia Snowe (Maine).

In the end, Baucus said, some Republicans will support healthcare legislation in the Senate this year – but he stopped short of predicting an agreement with Grassley, Enzi or Snowe prior to the mark up.

“I think there will be Republicans. I’m not saying it’s going to be on the mark; I’m saying that, by the time we complete mark-up, there’ll be Republicans that vote for it,” Baucus said.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/58691-dems-ready-to-amend-baucus-health-bill

Comments (30)

the only people that need insurance is the uninsuredwhy not work wih the ins co to create a product for them15 years ago the suggestion was made to use congressown health care as a model to revamp medicare see how far that got kickem all out and start all overBY ed on 09/14/2009 at 23:36
i read harry reid is in the fight of his life to keep his seat and that 10-20 more seats could be lost in the upcoming elections is this why the white house has take over the elections stuff from dept of commerceBY ed  on 09/14/2009 at 23:45
Yeah, finally we may actually see some of the reforms needed in our health care system. Once the public realizes these changed will affect everyone for the better, they will wonder why some in Wahington saw it as necessary to fight against these changes so fearcely and frighten the public with lies. Kudos to Senator Kerry for being honest about the process.BY Mark  on 09/15/2009 at 00:57
Senator Baucus is beholden to the Health Insurance Industry for its hugh campaign contributions. They own him. It is sad that decorum requires senators like John Kerry from publicly calling Baucus out on this truth. My only hope is that Baucus will be prevented by his fellow senators from killing the public option to please his Health Insurance masters.BY Robert Arend on 09/15/2009 at 01:54
Seems like destroying the private insurance industry is on the agenda. Here comes the second depression. It's like the dems read what went wrong in the first depression, and decided to do all that was wrong… force taxation, force job losses, employ tariffs, etc. On top of it, illegals will STILL go to the emergency room and get care, and we'll just get another tax to pay for that. Losing freedom is not a good exchange for change.BY JD Plus on 09/15/2009 at 02:24
Health insurance cooperatives is a bad idea that will not substantial redress the prevailing problems. Having worked in the health care industry and created a financial co-op, I am fairly certain that co-ops are a terrible substitute for public option. They virtually seal our fate and protect insurance companies from the need to change. http://graniterg.com/uploads/GRG20090827-C90GPHCR.pdfBY Ken on 09/15/2009 at 03:59
Without the public option, this bill will be a stimulus for insurance companies, big business and special interest groups.BY John Gabriel on 09/15/2009 at 09:16
'the bill would legally require most people to obtain coverage.' Stay out of my life!!!BY Bullhead on 09/15/2009 at 10:41
Reducing the cost of healthcare is a very feasible proposition; as we spend twice more per person than other countries. Healthcare can be streamlined with a system of Rewards and Disincentives to all stakeholders. Reducing the cost of medical care would benefit all (including Medicare) and the level for income subsidies reduced. There is NO conservative position or liberal position. There is a common-sense position that can benefit all.BY rad21 on 09/15/2009 at 10:52
I just would like all to know that we, the people of the great state of Montana, think Max Baucus is a snake who did everything possible to not meet with us and go over this ideas on Healthcare. There is no transparency from either him or his staff. We no longer have trust in what this man does or says and neither should you. We'll be working diligently to replace this individual that takes in ALOT of money from lobbyist and special interest. Consider this as a warning about the person who is trying to push his "special version" of healthcare down America's throat.BY Ana S on 09/15/2009 at 11:34

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.