THE HILL
 

Senate Democrats pull back on Specter’s card-check prediction

By Kevin Bogardus and J. Taylor Rushing - 09/17/09 04:45 AM ET

Democratic senators on Wednesday downplayed Sen. Arlen Specter’s (D-Pa.) prediction that the chamber would pass a contentious union-organizing bill this year, saying they are in the process of shoring up support for a compromise that is being hashed out.

Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), one of several negotiators working to reach agreement on a modified version of the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), also known as card-check, said they have made progress toward a deal but have yet to ink one.

Several Democrats on Wednesday confessed to knowing nothing about a proposed deal, and the party’s top two leaders in the conference called the card-check proposal a work in progress.

“We have had real good discussions,” Carper said. “As they say, frank and honest discussion. I think we have made real progress and narrowed somewhat of the differences between organized labor and the business community. We are not quite there yet. My hope is we will finish what we have started.”

Specter on Tuesday told the AFL-CIO convention in Pittsburgh that senators “have pounded out an Employees Choice bill which will meet labor’s objectives” and predicted it would pass before the end of this year. That set off a flurry of activity from lawmakers and union officials saying no agreement had been reached.

Carper said while negotiations over the bill have come closer to a “consensus approach,” no deal has been brokered. Centrist Democrats, Carper said, have not been included in talks among negotiators so far.

“I don’t think they know because they are not aware of the negotiations or where the middle ground lays,” Carper said. “It just has not been roundly discussed. We will reconvene later this fall.”

The Delaware senator indicated that there have been no formal talks on the union bill since July.

Asked about any deal on the bill, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said,” I’m not aware of any.”

Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said the same, calling the issue “a work in progress” and saying he expects the Democrats’ lead negotiator, Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), will inform Democrats when a deal is reached.

“It’s been in progress for months,” Durbin said. “I think if they ever reach common agreement, they’ll notify us and then we will take it from there.”

Centrist Democrats also said they were unaware of any agreement.

“Nothing final, to my knowledge, has been finalized, but I know members from both sides have been working on, I guess, a compromise,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.).

Sen. Kay Hagan (D-N.C.) was surprised to hear the issue was being revived. “From what I understood, the whole card-check issue was dead,” Hagan said.

And Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), who faces reelection in 2010 and said earlier this year she would oppose the bill, said she is unaware of any changes. “I haven’t heard or seen anything yet,” Lincoln said.

What remains unclear is what a deal would look like.

Lawmakers have been discussing removing a contentious provision that would allow workers to bypass secret-ballot elections and unionize when a majority of them sign authorization cards. In his speech before the AFL-CIO, Specter suggested that another controversial measure that would force management and workers to negotiate union contracts quickly — termed binding arbitration — was included in the agreement.

“The bottom line is they have a deal,” said a Democratic lobbyist, but questions remain over the whip count.

With Sen. Edward Kennedy’s (D-Mass.) death, there are 59 senators in the Democratic Conference, not enough to overcome a filibuster. Even if Lincoln votes for the bill, that’s one short, and there have been discussions among lawmakers of reaching out to centrist Republican senators, such as Maine Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, said the lobbyist.

Nevertheless, Democrats’ best chance of passing the labor bill may have come last summer.

Last week, in a speech before labor activists on Capitol Hill, Harkin said he wanted to bring the bill to the floor in July but stopped when Kennedy could not come to Washington and vote due to illness.

Harkin said Wednesday he felt he was only close to a deal then and not completely there.

“I thought we were close to having an agreement that we could bring it out and vote on. Close — nothing’s final until you bring it out,” Harkin said.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/59143-senate-democrats-pull-back-on-specters-card-check-prediction

Comments (8)

Is there one investigative reporter who will dare to ask Barack Obama where he stands on the union card-check proposal, and whether national elections should also be conducted in a card-check fashion?BY Davole on 09/17/2009 at 08:44
Here's what Obama said Tuesday at the AFL-CIO National Convention in Pittsburgh: "ThatBY No to EFCA on 09/17/2009 at 08:56
Boeing employees decertified their union recently…the union demanded that it be done by secret ballot…Unions bring nothing to the value of a product but impact its cost negatively. Unionized industries are never as competitive, nor are their products as qualitative, as non-union output. They are simply a tax on some goods to finance political efforts.Time to publish the compensation packages for union management…see how very much they get from forced union dues for how very little they actually do.Check-card is one more step toward nationalization of industry by the democrat cash cow… unions.BY George Dixon on 09/17/2009 at 11:12
Davole: No, and you and I both know it. They're too busy falling over themselves to kiss his a**. At least Fox has some cojoines!BY Reality Cehck on 09/17/2009 at 11:37
Unions add cost, not value to any organization.BY Observer 1 on 09/17/2009 at 13:10
Absolute power corrupts absolutely! The need for unions has all but passed.The one time vehicle gauranteeing decent wages, benefits, and working conditions in order to protect working people from unfair treatment by their employers has becime nothing more than a cash cow for the Democrat party.You remember the Democrats. They're the people telling you that only Republicans are rich, and want to continue their abuse of the poor and downtrodden. Wake up America ! The Antichrist is in the Oval Office..A fraudulent Christian and probable Muslim about whom we know precious little, but who hoodwinked the groups of starry-eyed youths,liberals ,and minorities who actually believed that this charlatan was anything but an imposter supported by an urban minority Mafia disguised as "community activists". Now the fat is in the fire, and the mask of Liberalism has slipped to show its true face! The band of thugs in the White House will surely steal every last bit of our freedom they can under the pretext of "change". For those of you who voted for him, you got what you deserve. For the rest of us, we'd like to have our Country back please!BY finder on 09/17/2009 at 14:11
Nothing will start a war with unions and Democrats on the losing end like legislation taking from workers their right to a secret ballot. Unions do not need card-check. It is a non-starter, a giant poison pill, really. What they need are issues workers can believe in sufficiently to join a union.BY libertasdon on 09/17/2009 at 15:10
None of you have your facts straight. EFCA is a modification to labor law. The modification to labor law (efca) is two fold. First part; if a majority of employees sign union cards stating that they desire union representation, they can be certified by the NLRB. Their choice. Second part; if a majority signs union cards and PETITIONS the NLRB for an election, the NLRB will set up an election. Either way, the employees choose. Sec. 9 of the NLRA giving employees the right to an election DOES NOT CHANGE under EFCA modification. Also, card check is legal right now under the NLRA and some employers use it such as; ATT, Dana, Navistar..etc. The choice to use card check presently under the NLRA is up to the EMPLOYERS instead of EMPLOYEES. Employers control the unionization process and this is wrong because that decision should be left to the employees. Testimony from those illegally fired for attempting to unionize their workplace in front of Congress has proven labor law is broken. The NLRB statistics back it up too. Illegal firings, workplace intimidation and delays in the collective bargaining process is proof that labor law needs to be modified and the playing field leveled. Workers are afraid to unionize because of the weak laws. If employees choose to organize through card check or secret ballot, why does this matter to you ? No one is forcing you to do anything. "Our country back", Yeh right! Back to the days of Wall Street greed and CEO abuse all sanctioned by the previous administration. That makes sense!BY daniel t on 09/18/2009 at 08:51

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.