THE HILL
 

Gov. Patrick to name Kennedy replacement

By Aaron Blake - 09/23/09 06:23 PM ET

The Massachusetts Legislature on Wednesday granted Gov. Deval Patrick the power to appoint a temporary replacement for the late Sen. Edward Kennedy, but with one catch: when the appointment can be made.

Lawmakers declined to allow the law to go into effect immediately, meaning Patrick (D) will either have to declare an emergency situation or wait 90 days to name Kennedy’s (D) successor.

The governor said after press time last night that he would declare an emergency so he can make the pick right away. He has scheduled an 11 a.m. announcement for Thursday.

Republicans have toyed with the idea of challenging Patrick’s legal authority to declare such an emergency, and legal challenges could also come from citizens.

“This is not an emergency," state Rep. Paul Frost (R) told The Associated Press, noting that it would be difficult for Patrick to declare an emergency after the State Legislature declined to do so.

The Massachusetts Republican Party responded early Thursday with a letter to the secretary of state requesting that he reject Patrick's emergency declaration and citing detailed legal precedent.

"The (state) Supreme Judicial Court has set forth that the Governor's letter to the Secretary declaring an emergency law can only be used when a law is subject to a referendum; and further, only when the law could be subject to suspension of its operation under The Referendum, III, Section 3," state GOP Chairwoman Jennifer Nassour said. "In such an instance, the Governor's letter declaring an emergency law would have the effect of terminating that suspension. No such suspension of law threat is viable in this case."

If Patrick were forced to wait 90 days, the appointment wouldn’t come until less than a month before a full-time successor is set to be chosen in a Jan. 19 special election. The bill needed a two-thirds majority in each heavily Democratic chamber in order for the law to go into effect immediately, but a significant number of Democrats joined Republicans in opposing the change.

Patrick's decision could be tempered by the fact that he has one of the lowest approval ratings of any well-known politician — 19 percent, in one survey — and faces a difficult reelection race next year.

However, an appointment would give Senate Democrats in Washington a 60th vote, ensuring the party has a filibuster-proof majority as it debates controversial legislation such as healthcare reform.

The Massachusetts GOP has already used a series of procedural maneuvers to delay the appointment bill, and the party has been united in opposition. Republicans say the move is purely partisan and note that Democrats stripped the governor of appointment powers in 2004, when Republican Mitt Romney held the office and could have picked a GOP successor to Democratic presidential nominee and Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), if he had won the White House.

Patrick is ready to make the pick in short order, and a Fox News report Wednesday suggested he had settled on former Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairman Paul Kirk, a one-time aide to Kennedy. As of press time, the report was unconfirmed.

Patrick’s office denied that a pick had been made, and a Democratic source said it was premature to start weeding through the candidates.

“It's blue-smoke and chattering-class time,” the source said. “No one knows anything.”

Kirk and former Gov. Michael Dukakis headline the list of those mentioned as potential appointees, and jockeying began even before the power to appoint one of them was granted. The Boston Globe reported Wednesday that Kennedy’s widow, Vicki, has endorsed Kirk, as have his sons Ted Jr. and Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.).

Democratic senators on Wednesday said Kirk or Dukakis would be good additions to the chamber.

Appointed Sen. Ted Kaufman (D-Del.), who like Kirk was a longtime aide to the previous incumbent, Joe Biden, suggested Kirk was the man for the job.

“People say it’s great that I got [appointed] because I know this town, but Paul Kirk would be totally, completely brilliant," Kaufman said. "Gov. Dukakis is great too, but I think Paul just has the edge because he knows the Senate and how the place works."

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said she knew both Kirk and Dukakis well, and that either choice would provide Senate Democrats with a critical 60th vote.

"They're both senior figures, they both know this body, neither one is shy and both have a quick learning curve," Feinstein said. “When we need 60 votes, 59 doesn’t do it. That's where it's critical."

The Boston Globe has endorsed Dukakis for the post.

Other potential appointees mentioned include former Lt. Gov. Evelyn Murphy and Harvard law school Professor Charles Ogletree.

— J. Taylor Rushing contributed to this article.

-- This article was updated at 8:06 a.m.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/60037-effort-to-temporarily-replace-kennedy-hits-snag

Comments (27)

lolol,this is too funny,as if the socailist democrats in mass. were going to get this done anyway,notice to all mass.state polititians; this is still america and you cant just change the rules to fit your pistol any time you like,oh i forgot you already did once now you want to change them back,if this isnt politically motivated ill kiss your ass.next memo, to all resident of mass who pay taxes all the rest ignore this memo ; move the hell out of mass and come west so you can actually live againBY john mosley on 09/23/2009 at 16:58
The Democrats are more funny then the Keystone Cops. Laws are funny things aren't they Democrats? You should try following them now and then.BY Josie on 09/23/2009 at 17:02
Isn't the Rule of Law silly? The Democrats in MA want to do want they want to do, even if it is the completely corrupt and total reverse of what they wanted to do just a few years ago. The Rule of Law just keeps getting in the way of their corrupt game playing. It will be interesting to see what the Gov does. Last I heard MA hadn't been attacked or hit by flood or fire. Its hard to see how not having a Senator for few months can be considered and emergency since the Democrats are the one that created the current process in 2004. If a vacancy wasn't an emergency when a Republican was the Governor why would it be because a Democrat is now?BY valwayne on 09/23/2009 at 17:53
I do enjoy it when Democrats are in control..I sit back and get many hours of laughter and entertainment as they try to bend rules and laws for their own political gains and demonize Republicans at the same time for exactly the same political ploys. Damn its great to be an American,,lol,, And I am from Louisiana so you no I have seen some dirty politics,,lolBY Duke40 on 09/23/2009 at 17:59
It is about time that the Democrats get caught at their own game. They think the world revolves around them and care for no one but themselves, even if it means bringing down capitalism and America.9/23/09 6:10 pmBY JeanetteWilliams on 09/23/2009 at 18:04
I have been absolutely outraged about this since I first heard about how blatantly political and underhanded it truly is. It would be hilarious, were it not so criminal! I hope Edward Kennedy IS resting in peace and I will not villify him here, I pray for his family and friends. Does it not make the political crowd in Mass. ashamed to hold their heads up when they bounce like bobble heads to any whim and fancy that Kennedy wants or wanted?, when he wants it? To have single handedly snapped his finger and have the supposedly sane Mass. legislature change the rules to prevent Romney his natural course of action is one thing. To divert back to how the system once worked, only for politics and to hold DEMOCRAT sway is scurrilous. It makes me sick how the spineless, worthless politicians are only after power and to bow and scrape at the feet of those who have it. It would have been better if the cause of Kennedy's life would have been to attempt, as weak as we all are, in our own feeble ways, to please God. We all have sins and fall short but another good cause would have been to speak for the genuine helpless, the countless babies that his agenda helped to slaughter! Where is their voice, they have no life to have a cause for! God Bless America, we are doomed if we dont change course.BY Davis on 09/23/2009 at 18:12
Why is it that so many of the right-wing gasbags who infest the internet have so much trouble with basic spelling and punctuation? I don't mean the occasional typo, but long strings of incoherent scratchings instead of simple and clear communication. "Mister" Mosley, who posted above, is a classic example. BTW I pay taxes and live in the West…I wish that he would move East and take a course in remedial English. I did enjoy his starting his silly rant with "lolol" which I guess would mean "laughing out loud out loud." Nice turn of phrase, Mose! BTW Valwayne states the case against the law change in a clear and rational way…those others of you should try to communicate the same way, instead of self-indulgent whooping and hollering (aka "preaching to the choir).BY TaylorB1 on 09/23/2009 at 18:23
Dear TAYLORB - I've also had to listen to and read about many gasbag liberals, who can't read or spell either …who u say Maxine Waters.BY Frantic on 09/23/2009 at 18:40
Hey there TaylorB1 — nice show of class. Keep up that anger, maybe your head will explode (correctly punctuated of course).BY PLH on 09/23/2009 at 18:51
These scum-bag rethuglicans can do nothing but obstruct and build roadblocks at every turn. They don't care about what's good for the country it's about the headlines they can make being ass-clowns…That's what you've got with the rethuglican party - a house of ass-clowns… pretty standard stuff everywhere…BY Winski on 09/23/2009 at 19:52

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.