THE HILL
 

Senate Finance Committee approves state public options

By Jeffrey Young - 10/01/09 03:12 PM ET

The Senate Finance Committee added a quasi-public option to the healthcare reform bill Thursday.

Two days after Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and a few other Democrats joined Republicans to defeat amendments to create a national government-run public option health insurance program, the committee voted in favor of a proposal by Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) to enable states to form their own public options.

"This proposal is about giving federal dollars to the states and putting them in the driver's seat," Cantwell said. "It is a public plan, but negotiated with the private sector."

All Democrats except Sen. Blanche Lincoln (Ark.) voted to support the Cantwell amendment and all Republicans voted against it. Baucus, who has resisted adding a public option of any kind to his bill based on the argument that there is not enough support in the Senate, was enthusiastic about Cantwell's proposal. "This is a great amendment," he said.

Under the Cantwell amendment, people with incomes between 133 percent and 200 percent of the federal poverty level who do not get insurance at work would enroll in these state-based programs. The federal tax credits that would otherwise have been given to those individuals would instead be paid to states to finance the plan. Cantwell based her amendment on a program in Washington state.

States could choose to set up their plans, which would negotiate with medical providers on payment rates rather than base them on Medicare's fees, as other public option plans would do. Cantwell and Baucus said the amendment would save money. "We are putting someone in charge, finally, of negotiating rates," Cantwell said.


The benefits offered by these state plans would have to be at least as good as under Medicaid or through a private plan sold through the health insurance exchange in the legislation.

Republicans complained that any claims that the state plans would save money were purely speculative because Cantwell's amendment has not been scored by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). "There is no CBO score to tell us that," said Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.). "We don't know that." Republicans also pointed out that Baucus had ruled numerous GOP amendments out of order because there were not CBO scores.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/61215-senators-approve-state-based-public-options

Comments (21)

washington State will be the next State to file bankruptcy. Federal Government Work can not subsidize all the democrat foney government paid for programs. Hang on to your pants Washington Resident your taxes will soon be more then your income.BY jake2 on 10/01/2009 at 17:29
Remember when hillary messed up Insurance in washington State. Residents of Washington couldn't buy extra healthcare. Heres come the dirty goose again.BY jake2 on 10/01/2009 at 17:31
I hope that means we here in California can put through our single payer program. It would have been in place years ago had it not be for Arnold. But, he's leaving next year.BY Diannah on 10/01/2009 at 18:10
Please let me understand this amendment - the money goes to the state instead of the individual - and that makes it better than a fed program. Just seems like an extra layer of gov't was just added to the plan.BY LPH on 10/01/2009 at 18:22
When California is the first to file bankruptcy it won't matter if you have a foney fraudulent single payer program, I think beings Cantwell and Murray can't follow the will of the people in Washington State, it may be time for a refererendum like the license tax, to vote against the State having the authority to lauch or invest in a single payer program. We are sick of the high taxes and inflation being brought on by the democrats.BY jake2 on 10/01/2009 at 18:28
There must be a public option. My company option has skyrocketed in costs and dedectibles prior to any consideration of coverage that I will never be able to afford to see a doctor. Not only that, I have a special needs child that was exempt for most treatments because they self-insure and had to fund it out of pocked without any internal support. I was lucky to be able to borrow money for his treatment, but now I have to pay back $100K and am facing my own health crisis. Yes, I work for a well respected company that claims the best coverage for employees. Unfortunately, it only looks good on paper.BY Steph on 10/01/2009 at 19:48
Americans are suffering due to lack of insurance or the high cost of health premiums. It's a shame that we live in this great country and yet many cannot affordable health coverage, working families, those who, no fault of their own, have lost their jobs. It's time our elected officials do the right thing for a change.BY Susie Copeland on 10/01/2009 at 21:55
GOP are pure obstructionists . They care only for the profits of the insurance companies. When wii Americans get their heads out of their rears and vote out every right wing nutcaseBY BarBara on 10/01/2009 at 23:04
The Finance committee should have waited for the CBO report on this proposal before adding it to the bill.It is irresponsible actions such as this which has caused our economy to spiral down the toilet bowl.I wish just one politician would actully do what they were elected to do: Represent the people of their district in an honest and open manner instead of pushing their own agendas.BY Dave on 10/02/2009 at 09:49
Remember, Canada's health care system started with one Prov. starting it. Now they all have it and love it. Maybe this will be a good start to full blown national health care. Hope so.BY Fred on 10/02/2009 at 12:00

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.