THE HILL
 

Senate Finance Committee approves state public options

By Jeffrey Young - 10/01/09 03:12 PM ET

The Senate Finance Committee added a quasi-public option to the healthcare reform bill Thursday.

Two days after Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and a few other Democrats joined Republicans to defeat amendments to create a national government-run public option health insurance program, the committee voted in favor of a proposal by Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) to enable states to form their own public options.

"This proposal is about giving federal dollars to the states and putting them in the driver's seat," Cantwell said. "It is a public plan, but negotiated with the private sector."

All Democrats except Sen. Blanche Lincoln (Ark.) voted to support the Cantwell amendment and all Republicans voted against it. Baucus, who has resisted adding a public option of any kind to his bill based on the argument that there is not enough support in the Senate, was enthusiastic about Cantwell's proposal. "This is a great amendment," he said.

Under the Cantwell amendment, people with incomes between 133 percent and 200 percent of the federal poverty level who do not get insurance at work would enroll in these state-based programs. The federal tax credits that would otherwise have been given to those individuals would instead be paid to states to finance the plan. Cantwell based her amendment on a program in Washington state.

States could choose to set up their plans, which would negotiate with medical providers on payment rates rather than base them on Medicare's fees, as other public option plans would do. Cantwell and Baucus said the amendment would save money. "We are putting someone in charge, finally, of negotiating rates," Cantwell said.


The benefits offered by these state plans would have to be at least as good as under Medicaid or through a private plan sold through the health insurance exchange in the legislation.

Republicans complained that any claims that the state plans would save money were purely speculative because Cantwell's amendment has not been scored by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). "There is no CBO score to tell us that," said Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.). "We don't know that." Republicans also pointed out that Baucus had ruled numerous GOP amendments out of order because there were not CBO scores.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/61215-senators-approve-state-based-public-options

Comments (21)

Maybe this is a good beginning. It is an embarrassment that the USofA has people suffering because of no health care. When I worked part time — no health insurance — all I could afford was a catastrophic plan. Good health care would have cost me $400 a month and that was back in 2002. Fortunately I passed the magic 65 and now have Medicare. Why do people think we don't have government health care?? What is Medicare? Let's just figure out a way to make it work for all. This is a good start.BY Judy on 10/02/2009 at 13:04
I love the "quasi public option" moniker. How about "CRAZY public option?" If you are on the right or left of things, the Cantwell Capitulation is guaranteed to be problematic if enacted. It has nothing to do with what Canadians began with. It is not a universal plan in that all citizens of a state would not be allowed to join the program. It would create just one more bureaucracy for insurance companies to participate in. Yikes!If you are on the right, Cantwell (perfect name for a health reformer?) and Baucus and Conrad have given you one more reason to doubt the sanity of the Dem Party leadership.For more than a decade polls have shown that the MAJORITY of Americans want a universal option of government-sponsored health care. Call it Improved and Expanded Medicare for All. Only Democrats stand in the way of this human right for us. Don't forget this in November of 2010!BY dikyzr on 10/02/2009 at 13:36
The only hope for us is that the Kucinich Amendment is included in the final sausage…uh, bill that the corporate funded Congress passes. The Kucinich Amendment allows state waivers from ERISA so that states like California can institute single-payer systems without spending years in court fighting the insurance mafia and Big PhRMA.The "co-ops" AIN'T EVEN CLOSE to the real single-payer system that Canada went to Province by Province. It's a republicrat "compromise" that would result in yet ANOTHER give-away to the worst of the worst after being skimmed by the states for more riot weaponry for the state police apparatus…If we lived in an actual democracy, we may have been able to get decent Health Care by now…but we don't live in an actual democracy.BY Chet on 10/02/2009 at 13:51
Plain and smiple here a web site that will help health car e in my book http://allaboutme21053.spaces.live.comit did for me save money time and get the cares I needed.BY Nascarforme on 10/02/2009 at 21:17
Are all of our elected officials afraid to take a stand for humanity? Isn't it more important to support the people of the united states rather than their own careers/big business. I was born and lived my single life in a southern state and I can tell you that distribution by the states will NOT be equal.BY Lou A. on 10/03/2009 at 20:01
Does anyone asking for the public option care about adding 1 trillion of debt to our already massive Federal debt? Debasing our currency is not an option!BY George on 10/05/2009 at 10:04
Our taxes in Missouri are incredibly high. Half of what we pay go to schools. If the public option goes through, it will add hundreds to yearly taxes we cannot afford as it is. I am a widow and struggle as it is with a bad mortgage that was sold to me. Now I will pay MORE taxes or be threatened with a fine and jail time. It is the most incredibly insane thing i have ever heard. To be a single person and own a home is almost impossible anymore and if you get behind on your taxes, they will take your home away,BY stacey on 10/06/2009 at 22:40
state-to-state public option to allow all 50 states to have their own policies and laws to provide universal coverage to everybody sounds better than no public option at all.The state-to-state public option could be the base-line point and then to gradually improve more and more. Everything has to have a base-line. We have to go from bottom-up; not top-down.Some form of public option is better than no public option. it could be the base-line. All 50 states have their own laws.BY obama supporter on 10/07/2009 at 00:08
To Obama Supporter: I agree. I have not had health Ins since my husband died because the dedectible was so high, no dr co pay and too many pre existing rules. Still, to fine someone or talk of jail time is a bit of a stretch. How many still drive without car insurance? I would use the public option, Im a baby boomer and need the coverage, what I dont need is soc sec benefits cut or higher taxes. What is current in the news now is that tax hikes are based on the number of umeployed in each state. We have Gov Nixon now who is much better than Matt Blunt.BY stacey on 10/07/2009 at 00:28
There needs to be a health care option for families that have both mom and dad working paying taxes but have employers who offer no medical coverage of any kind.BY melissa on 10/25/2009 at 21:30
Economist Jeff Goldsmith, in the Health Affairs blog, notes that "states that already have such plans, like Washington, are eviscerating their funding as we speak, leaving safety net providers [hospitals and doctors who take care of the poor] gasping." Neither states nor the feds can afford to hand out all the free or cheap benefits they promise, so they resort to underpaying providers. But health service firms and professionals can't be forced to work for peanuts, so they can and do refuse.Goldsmith's critique of "public option" plans is well worth reading:http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/05/15/the-public-plan-not-worth-the-risks/BY Alan Reynolds on 11/01/2009 at 12:09

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.