THE HILL
 

Reid, Baucus ready to split on public option for healthcare as vote nears

By J. Taylor Rushing - 10/05/09 05:00 AM ET

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), once in polite disagreement over the idea of a public option component in healthcare legislation, are approaching a breaking point over the issue.

Reid and Baucus have staked out opposing positions on the central question of a government role in health reform — Reid has consistently stood in favor, but Baucus has consistently said the idea doesn’t have enough Senate support.

Instead, Baucus has inserted insurance co-operatives into the bill that is scheduled for a final vote on Tuesday.

After that, decision time will loom for Reid, who has said he plans to merge the Finance Committee version with the one passed by the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee in July. The majority leader has said he plans to consult Baucus — with whom he enjoys a generally good relationship — along with HELP Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and the White House.

But the Nevada senator’s input will be critical. Having deferred the issue to Baucus this summer, Reid signaled on Thursday that he is prepared to join Sens. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and John Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), who both pushed a public option amendment that failed in a committee vote last Tuesday.

“We are going to have a public option before this bill goes to the president's desk," Reid said in a conference call with constituents on Thursday, as reported by the Las Vegas Sun. “I believe the public option is so vitally important to create a level playing field and prevent the insurance companies from taking advantage of us.”

On the same day, Harkin gave The Des Moines Register the same message, suggesting clearly that he will side with Reid against Baucus.

“We will have a bill on the president’s desk before Christmas, a health reform bill. It will have a lot of good stuff in it. It will have a lot of prevention and wellness programs in there that I’ve been fighting for,” Harkin said in a conference call. “And it will have a public option. The question of if it doesn’t isn’t even an option.”


In another sign that Reid’s decision will hold sway, Harkin told The New York Times last weekend that Reid will be the Democrats’ “quarterback” as the bill moves toward the floor.

“There will be wrangling,” Harkin said. “But Mr. Reid will make the final calls. Our quarterback is Harry Reid… We elected him to that position. He will decide how this is done.”

Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.), the No. 3 Democratic leader in the upper chamber, has been leading the charge for a public option. Schumer and Reid have a close working relationship.

A Democratic Senate source downplayed any differences, saying that Reid, Baucus and Harkin cooperate well but that the Finance Committee bill is the only legislation that can pass the Senate.

"President Obama clearly articulated his blueprint in his speech, and everyone knows Finance has the bulk of the bill that reflects that blueprint," the source said. "Everyone, including the White House, knows the Finance bill is the only bill that’s paid for and can pass. In short, the White House wants a win, and using the bulk of the Baucus bill is the playbook to get the 'W.' "

Watching from the Republican ranks, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) did his best on Friday to keep a spotlight on the difference among the Democratic leaders. Asked by reporters if the GOP’s failure so far to block the bill in the Finance Committee could be a harbringer of the coming floor action, McConnell acknowledged, “it may.”

“The Democrats were given a big majority.  They have the White House.  They have a big majority in the House.  They have 60 votes in the Senate. They ought to be able to do anything they want to,” McConnell said.

“The question is:  Will they?  Are their own members comfortable enough with a proposal that takes $500 billion out of Medicare over the next 10 years and raises billions of dollars in taxes on both individuals and corporations?  Are they comfortable with that?  If they are, they should have the votes to pass it.”

A senior GOP aide said Republicans suspect Reid’s decision will prevail on whether to include a public option.

“Those are the three guys involved, but Reid has really put himself in the middle of this whole thing,” the aide said. “He’s said all along he wanted to be the guy to take control of this.”

Reid spokesman Jim Manley said any differences between Reid, Baucus and Harkin are “overblown.”

“Sen. Reid will work with President Obama and members of the Finance and HELP Committee to put together a bill that garners the 60 votes necessary to overcome a Republican filibuster. But the final action is going to be on the Senate floor, where the Senate will work its will.”

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/61561-reid-baucus-ready-to-split-on-public-option

Comments (57)

The Dems. OBVIOUSLY did not get the PEOPLES message in August. We clearly told them WE DO NOT WANT THE GOVERNMENT ANYMORE INVOLVED IN OUR HEALTH CARE. They are trying to give us the "full Polanski" on this. They better not try and pass this horrible grab of 1/6th of our health care.While the rest of the world takes a turn to the right, our leaders are trying to lurching WAY left.Smack em fown in 2010.BY danceswithtrees on 10/05/2009 at 10:19
Caryn: It is naive fools, such as yourself, blindly following O'Bama over the cliff, that are truly responsible for this mess, due to the lack of intelligence to debate and see throught the rhetoric with an open mind for other ideas. Nothing is more important than a Congressman's job to a Congressman. The notion that you believe otherwise proves my point.BY Reality Check on 10/05/2009 at 10:26
Hey there PGBACH. Me thinks you need to look up the definition of "blatant" and "racist". You will find your comment misuses these terms. Until you understand the English language, you should probably keep your comments to yourself, lest you embarrass yourself further.BY PLH on 10/05/2009 at 10:33
Well, atleast I'll have a reason to get drunk and dance naked in the street. Yes, soon as we start throwing these dumb-as-craps (democrats) out of office beginning in 2009 in Virginia and NJ. We'll pitch them in the garbage one pluck of a feather from the chicken at a time.BY Negro Woman on 10/05/2009 at 10:52
you people who aren't in favor of the public option are sacrificing lives to support insurance company profits. i don't know how you sleep at night. if you are religious as many of you say, this won't look good on judgment day.BY maureen travis on 10/05/2009 at 10:54
All this is an example of how we are bogged down in complexity and creating a massive bureaucracy in the process. What appears the most absurd is that the justification for a public option remains the so-called "abuses" by insurance companies all of which have been taken care of in the legislation regardless of which bill. What insurance companies do to manage costs like pre-certification, medical necessity, etc. is exactly what any plan public or private must do (and which medicare should be doing more of).What nonsense. Additional views on the web we weave at on my Blog should anyone be interested:http ://quinnscommentar y.com/2009/10/05/the-web-we-weave/BY Dick Quinn on 10/05/2009 at 11:10
This whole "debate" shows how out of touch with mainstream America the democrats are. Reid will force a "public option" that he says will "create a level playing field and prevent the insurance companies from taking advantage of us." Yet, it was the democrats who designed the current system, restricting insurance co from selling across state lines and allowing them to design plans to the local constituency. The public option will force all of us into gov health care that will be understaffed, under funded, and low qualitity.BY bmerr2009 on 10/05/2009 at 11:14
Gov't Healthcare? With the compassion of the IRS, the efficiency of the Post Office and the effectiveness of the Katrina response? Have you really, really thought about the long term effects of gov't healthcare?BY Rick on 10/05/2009 at 11:25
Stimulate the economy, furlough Congress!Then we all can get back to building a better life for ourselves and our families.BY cuttoscore74 on 10/05/2009 at 11:28
As long as FOX News and their ilk are distracted by the creation of a phony crisis out of a trivial player like ACORN, Harry Reid and the democrats can spend all the time they want creating a workable healthcare system to replace the welfare system for the rich insurance executives that we have now.BY Will R. on 10/05/2009 at 11:32
Do I want this piece of BS to pass? No. But if it does, it will get the democrats out of power in 2010 and 2012. So it might be worth it at that.BY lilamae on 10/05/2009 at 11:34
Heavy tax burden on most Americans, but why should democratic congress worry, they forget to pay their own taxes.BY bailedout on 10/05/2009 at 11:55
I love the argument coming from the democrats that " I hear what my constituents are saying, however, I know whats best and I'll vote for the public option because I feel its best for the country. Its all about "me". Show us the TRUE cost for this program and then vote on it. It will be the end to anyone's career in 2010 and 2012.BY rogpeck2002 on 10/05/2009 at 12:13
Two things are all you need to know. The democrats voted NO on an amendment to force congress and the admin. to be in the govt. plan, and they voted NO on giving congress three days to read the bill.BY Tom R on 10/05/2009 at 12:28
The public option is an over reach. There are so many effective ways of reducing cost and expanding access that don't require a new entitlement which we can't afford.BY Humphster on 10/05/2009 at 12:41
I relate the comments at the tail end of all political columns to that of a diverse cirus sideshow, where everyone is attempting to one-up each other by showcasing their mystical/unusual/freak abilities. Regardless of if you are hopelessly partisan, and believe nothing from a liberal (if you are righty) or a righty (if you are a liberal), you need to ask yourself if you are being truthful. We teach our kids that lying is wrong, and unacceptable from a young age - so alot of you that frequent these comment sections need to put this basic morality standard that you should have been taught at a young age into practice. Rightys, Do you think that Limbaugh or Hannity are being truthful, even half of the time? Or do you know deep down that what they tell you is bloated, respun and aborted 'facts', but you are so helplessly partisan that you have no ability to understand the issues on your own?BY Eric on 10/05/2009 at 13:09
same goes for liberals to the above statement. Leave the vitriol at the door folks, and regain your civility.BY Eric  on 10/05/2009 at 13:10
Kill this bill, and then maybe Obama will do what he said he would do, which is to work with all on a bill that works for Americans, not just Democratic special interests.Get Dems, Repubs, and all constituents in a room and do what you said you would do! This is important, but this method, and all of the current bills are really not the right way.Could it be that Obama will kill with a Veto, he said he would not sign anything that increases the deficit.BY Mark on 10/05/2009 at 13:20
The polls now show that a majority of Americans support the public option and that support for it is rising. The third most trusted group on health care is the doctors and they support the public option.Politicians need to get a clue and those who have been fed nonsense by FOX need to change channels.BY Jane on 10/05/2009 at 15:19
Sen Bill Nelson of FL said that he would not vote for a bill with a "public option". I trust he will keep his word because FL independent voters like myself will be closely watching to see if he does. Furthermore,it would not be wise in FL to vote for a bill that strips 500 billion out of Medicare, even if done over ten years, and would also not be advisable to vote for one that does away with Medicare Advantage. Seniors will be watching as well.BY FL independent  on 10/05/2009 at 15:21

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.