McCain: Obama could make 'error of historic proportions' on Afghanistan

McCain: Obama could make 'error of historic proportions' on Afghanistan

Sen. John McCainJohn McCainDem: Trump’s claim that media is the enemy is what ‘tin-pot dictators say’ McCain on shutting down press: That's how dictators get started Trump budget could ax arts, public broadcasting, anti-drug office: report MORE (R-Ariz.) said that the United States cannot win the war in Afghanistan without the 40,000 additional troops that the top military commander there is said to be recommending.

McCain was asked Sunday on CNN’s "State of the Union" if American forces could prevail with a surge of fewer than 40,000 troops.

“I do not,” responded McCain, Obama’s GOP rival for the presidency in 2008.

“I think the great danger now is not an American pullout,” McCain said. “I think the great danger is a half-measure.”

President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaEx-House intel chairman: US 'not necessarily winning' the cyber war Peter King to Trump: ‘Slow down’ on tweets and get the job done Police say 9,000 people turned out for Trump's rally MORE is weighing the possibility of sending tens of thousands of new troops to Afghanistan upon the recommendation of Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who has prepared a troubling assessment of the eight-year-old war and determined that a much larger military force will be needed to turn the tide of the conflict.

Reports of the still-confidential McChrystal report have put the number of recommended new troops at 40,000.

While criticizing the leaking of the McChrystal report, McCain called the details that have been reported by the press “generally accurate.”

“I have urged the president to act with deliberate speed,” McCain said. “I hope the president will heed the advice of his advisers.”

McCain said that if Obama chooses to follow a course different than the one urged by his generals on the ground, he will be making “an error of historic proportions.”

Obama has not indicated how he will handle the McChrystal report other than making assurances that he intends to listen to a range of opinions regarding Afghanistan before deciding whether more troops or any new strategy is needed.

On "Meet the Press," Armed Services Committee Chairman Sen. Carl LevinCarl LevinSilencing of Warren another example of hyperpartisan Senate GOP going nuclear over Gorsuch might destroy filibuster forever Obama to preserve torture report in presidential papers MORE (D-Mich.) said the president needs to carefully weigh the options to maximize the chance of success in Afghanistan. Levin said opined that the best way forward is to send more trainers to mold the Afghan forces, citing Iraq as the model for success.

"At this time, don't send more combat troops," Levin said. "...The surge that will really work will be a surge of Afghan troops."

Armed Services Committee member Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey GrahamThe Hill's 12:30 Report McConnell: I’m very sympathetic to 'Dreamers' GOP senators unnerved by Trump-Russia relationship MORE (R-S.C.) disagreed, saying that efforts at training will be unsuccessful without a secure ground situation.

"Without better security and more combat power we're going to lose in Afghanistan," Graham said.

Graham challenged Obama to "earn the award he was given" by implementing a "robust strategy," even offering to build Obama a cabinet to store his Nobel peace prize if the president manages to turn around the war in Afghanistan and keep Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.

"Obama will be judged by the decision he makes" on Afghanistan, Graham said.

Graham predicted that if McChrystal's recommendations are followed, Afghanistan could be turned around in 24 months.