By J. Taylor Rushing - 10/15/09 12:06 AM EDT
Senate Republicans are pushing a provision aimed at blocking the Obama administration from trying in U.S. civilian courts anyone accused of plotting the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
An amendment by Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey GrahamKerry: US 'on the verge' of suspending talks with Russia on Syria GOP leaders express reservations a day after 9/11 veto override McConnell opens door to changing 9/11 bill MORE (R-S.C.) would “prohibit the use of funds for the prosecution in Article III courts of the United States of individuals involved in the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.”
Attached to an appropriations bill, the amendment was scheduled for a vote Wednesday, but floor wrangling has likely delayed it until next week. It would affect about a half-dozen suspects who were involved in planning the attacks.
Graham said defeating his amendment would force a “fundamental shift in national security policy” by criminalizing war suspects and possibly jeopardizing their prosecution.
“It would be a major strategic mistake to take the mastermind of 9/11 and put him in a federal court,” Graham said, referring to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. “It would be a zoo.”
Democrats are expected to back the Obama administration and defeat the amendment, arguing that U.S. officials need flexibility in prosecution decisions and accusing the GOP of blocking attempts to bring the suspects to justice.
“Why should we preclude any forum where they can be successfully tried and held accountable?” Majority Whip Dick DurbinDick DurbinDems gain upper hand on budget McConnell: Senate could drop flood money from spending bill Funding bill rejected as shutdown nears MORE (D-Ill.) told The Hill. “We rely on civilian courts every day for the security of Americans in our neighborhoods and homes, and I am not going to draw a conclusion that the Department of Justice should not be part of this conversation. I want them tried in a court where they are most likely to be prosecuted.”
Firing back, Minority Leader Mitch McConnellMitch McConnellObama administration officials ramp up push for Pacific pact Overnight Defense: GOP leaders express concerns after 9/11 veto override | Lawmakers press for Syria 'plan B' | US touts anti-ISIS airstrikes Overnight Finance: Lawmakers float criminal charges for Wells Fargo chief | Scrutiny on Trump's Cuba dealings | Ryan warns of recession if no tax reform MORE (R-Ky.) lambasted the administration for flying terror suspect Ahmed Ghailani to New York this summer to face trial for bombing the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.
“This was an act of war,” McConnell said. “Ghailani does not belong in civilian court alongside con men and stick-up artists.”
Republicans hope to use the amendment to portray Democrats as inconsistent, after supporting a provision in July that called for military commission trials for war prisoners and making several statements against bringing the suspects into America.
While Graham, Sen. John McCainJohn McCainKerry: US 'on the verge' of suspending talks with Russia on Syria Trump, Clinton to headline Al Smith dinner Overnight Defense: Congress overrides Obama 9/11 veto | Pentagon breathes easy after funding deal | More troops heading to Iraq MORE (R-Ariz.) and others have long advocated for closing the Guantánamo Bay prison, they have consistently complained that the U.S. legal system is unfit for some of the prison’s high-risk inmates.
In a letter to Obama on Aug. 6, Graham joined McCain, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) in calling for the Sept. 11 suspects to be tried at Guantánamo Bay.
“Given the robust procedural and substantive rights now provided by this revised system of military commissions, and the sensitive nature of much of the evidence that would be brought forth, we are disturbed that your administration has expressed a clear preference for prosecuting alleged war criminals in federal district courts in Virginia, New York and the District of Columbia,” the senators wrote.
“Such trials would treat the war on terrorism as a law enforcement operation, rather than a war, and would treat its alleged perpetrators as common criminals instead of violators of the laws of war.”