THE HILL
 

Democratic Senators sound alarm on red ink

By Walter Alarkon - 10/19/09 07:16 PM ET

Senate Democrats are pressing Majority Leader Harry Reid to address the nation’s rising debt with a special legislative process, despite reluctance from the White House and House leaders.

Nine Democrats and Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) called on Reid (D-Nev.) last week to support the process, which would ensure any legislation aimed at curtailing debt gets serious consideration by lawmakers. Proponents have argued for a special panel to seriously consider fiscal policy changes, such as major tax hikes or spending cuts, that they fear wouldn’t survive the normal committee process.

The debt is now at nearly $12 trillion and expected to grow by $9 trillion over the next decade. The renewed push for a legislative remedy comes just after the deficit reached a record high, $1.4 trillion for fiscal 2009. The previous deficit record was $455 billion in 2008. The Obama administration projects an additional $9 trillion in debt over the next decade.

“We do not believe that action on these important issues will occur under the regular order in Congress,” the senators wrote in a letter.

Lieberman and Democratic Sens. Evan Bayh (Ind.), Mark Udall (Colo.), Mark Begich (Alaska), Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), Mark Warner (Va.), Bill Nelson (Fla.), Michael Bennet (Colo.) and Claire McCaskill (Mo.) signed the letter.

Bayh said he raised the possibility of a special fiscal legislative process with President Barack Obama during a White House meeting last week.

The deficit has been steadily growing in recent years because of entitlement spending and is expected to get even worse as the baby-boomer generation retires. The Congressional Budget Office expects the nearly $700 billion total annual spending on Medicaid and Medicare to double over the next 10 years.

But red ink flowed even faster than projected in 2009 because of the bad economy and government efforts to fix it. Though the 2008 deficit was a record at the time, it more than tripled, to $1.4 billion in 2009.

Spending increased from nearly $3 trillion to $3.5 trillion over the past year, as both the George W. Bush and Obama administrations spent billions on stimulus packages and industry bailouts. With profits down and unemployment rising to nearly 10 percent, tax revenue fell from $2.5 trillion to $2.1 trillion in 2009.

The business community has generally backed attempts to curtail debt, seen as a threat to the strength of the dollar and the U.S. economy as a whole.

Scott Talbott, senior vice president of the Financial Services Roundtable, said that financial firms are supportive of a bipartisan effort to address the country’s fiscal imbalance.

“The rising debt hampers the U.S. economy and redirects resources away from U.S. taxpayers,” Talbott said.

More than two dozen senators have now backed the idea of a special process to address the country’s fiscal imbalance. Sens. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) and Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) have pushed a bill creating a bipartisan panel of lawmakers and administration officials that would craft a package of legislative reforms. That proposal would then be fast-tracked for final votes in both chambers. Conrad and Gregg’s plan was co-sponsored by 20 other senators, most of them Republican.

Lieberman and Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) have put forth a similar plan, as have Reps. Frank Wolf (R-Va.) and Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.). All have said that the path to fiscal solvency requires politically perilous changes to entitlement programs, particularly Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, which lawmakers are loath to support without the backing of both parties.

The idea of pushing through changes outside of regular order has powerful detractors, especially in the House. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) have argued that the existing committees should be able to weigh in on any major fiscal policy changes. They’ve noted that the proposals relying on an independent panel to craft a fiscal reform package aren’t flexible, since they would limit lawmakers’ amendments.

Gregg told The Hill last month that he’s not aware of his plan coming up in serious negotiations with the White House.

The Democrats who signed the letter said a measure allowing a special process should be linked to a debt-limit increase. The administration has pressed the Senate to approve an increase to the $12.1 trillion debt ceiling this fall, when federal debt is expected to surpass that number. The House approved increasing the limit to $13 trillion last spring. The government risks defaulting with its creditors if the limit is breached.

The record deficit has fueled calls throughout Washington to get the red ink under control.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said Monday that reducing trade imbalances with China and the federal debt will be key to avoiding future economic crises.

“The United States must increase its national saving rate,” Bernanke said in a speech at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. “The most effective way to accomplish this goal is by establishing a sustainable fiscal trajectory, anchored by a clear commitment to substantially reduce federal deficits over time.”

White House budget director Peter Orszag, in responding to the deficit announcement last week, said that the administration is looking at proposals to “put our country back on firm fiscal footing.”

The Obama administration and Democrats have resisted GOP calls for immediate action to cut the deficit, arguing that pulling back spending while the country is still in a recession would slow a recovery.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/63807-dem-senators-raise-alarm-on-rising-red-ink

Comments (35)

Where are the calls for hearings on the financial crisis? A year later, and not one invistitgation requested? One way to jump start economy is for Congress to announce they are not going to spend the rest of the stimulous money!BY Mon on 10/19/2009 at 21:22
Um…Walter, last time I checked Medicare and social security were still in the black. The deficits over the last decade were from tax cuts and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Frankly it's astounding that you could write this entire piece without mentioning that.BY adam on 10/19/2009 at 22:39
It staggers the mind. — It's beyond fiction. — I consider the extreme Leftists who surround a Left President. — I consider the stark, continual failures of this Administration to act in American interests on the world scene - for instance - 1) capitulating to Russia on the Missile Shield while they build a new "unstoppable" missile - 2) eliminating all pressure for Sanctions against Iran's nuclear program - 3) tying troop increases to a "clean" election in Afghanistan, which is nothing more than a replay of a ploy used in Vietnam - 4) the support of Zelaya in Honduras and the refusal to send previously agreed aid - Connecting these dots is not complicated, except by our willful blindness.— Obama has been bankrolled by George Soros, who managed to be a Nazi collaborator and then, a Stalinist, in the blink of his eye. — Soros can never return to British soil because he attempted to subvert the Pound Sterling. — What he failed to do in Britain, he's succeeding to do in the U.S. — Soros remains a Stalinist, an advocate of the KGB and friend to Putin. — And, he's bankrolled MoveOn.org, the Democratic Party and this President. — After more than half a century, he is finally seeing his way to bringing down The West by bankrupting the U.S.BY cme on 10/19/2009 at 22:58
Yet of those 10 senators at least six are shoeins to vote for a Healthcare reform bill in the Senate that would bury this country in red ink in the future. Hypcrits. Only Lieberman, Warner, Begich and Bayh have any reason to send this letter with a straight face. The rest, well you can guess.BY gabe on 10/19/2009 at 23:07
Adam, medicare and social security are a seperate tax and trust account. Has nothing to do with with wars. That is a seperate items in the funding. Not like the dem's fund the dem's took from our military to fund Ted Kennedy's institute. It seems like you missed accounting 101.BY PL on 10/19/2009 at 23:15
Geeze! Get it right, would you? The total red ink for 2008 was just over a trillion dollars: "The previous deficit record was $455 billion in 2008."Read "Will the Real Deficit for 2008 Please Stand Up?" http://owlnest.blogspot.com/2009/10/will-real-budget-deficit-for-2008.htmlBY Robert Emory on 10/19/2009 at 23:31
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0qNEOdtenYfeature=player_embeddedDon't worry people - after december OBAMA is selling us out to a world Governent.Can't rule by law rule by treaties!!!!BY mrmacc on 10/20/2009 at 00:09
Absolutely. I want to see these hearings. How in the heck can Obama and the Dems think about implementing all they want including Health care reform, Cap and tax, card check etc…Yes GWB over spent and his last budget was 455B in the whole. Obama is tripling it this year and he hasn't even started on his real agenda. No he needs to be told by our Congress. We can't afford this. If they don't we will replace them. Simple as that.BY danceswithtrees on 10/20/2009 at 00:20
not one mention of the world domination theme of the past one hundred years, 3.5T @ 0.64 going towards world occupation. Savings $2,000,000,000, 000.00BY smoke on 10/20/2009 at 01:14
One has a mental image of the Inspector being amazed that gambling is occurring at Rick's as he is being handed his winnings…I mean, for the love of Pete, are our Congress people really that stupid? Are we so ill governed that we, The People, will have to storm the very halls of Congress and run each and every one of these profoundly irresponsible miscreants out of town on rails? Is that what it will take?If so, sign me up.BY Richard W on 10/20/2009 at 01:34

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.