Schumer to Obama: 'Significantly revamp corporate governance'

Sen. Charles SchumerCharles SchumerElection-year politics: Senate Dems shun GOP vulnerables Democrats press Wells Fargo CEO for more answers on scandal 78 lawmakers vote to sustain Obama veto MORE (D-N.Y.), one of Wall Street’s most consistent supporters, is nudging the Obama administration to go further in its effort to restrict executive pay and reform financial firms that received public bailout funds.

In a letter Thursday to the administration’s “pay czar,” Kenneth Feinberg, Schumer endorses Feinberg’s announcement Thursday that salaries to 175 executives at seven companies would be cut by 90 percent over their 2008 levels.

But Schumer also wants Feinberg to force the seven companies to “significantly revamp their corporate governance across the board” to prevent conflicts of interest and other practices at the board of directors level.

A longtime protector of the financial industry, Schumer told The Hill the economic meltdown changed the rules for Wall Street.

“We’re in a different world here, and if you get bailout money the same practices can no longer continue to exist, period,” he said.

Schumer’s letter reads, “While reigning [sic] in compensation practices at these firms is certainly necessary to ensure that taxpayer money is well spent and not squandered on lavish pay, executive compensation is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the practices that so recently put our entire financial system at risk.

“These companies are the poster children for the total breakdown in corporate governance and lack of effective board oversight that contributed to the recent crisis, and I believe these reforms are critical if the government is serious about turning these companies around, returning them to private sector ownership and ensuring they participate in the markets as responsible corporate citizens.”

Specifically, Schumer points to his “Shareholders' Bill of Rights” legislation that he introduced in May with Sen. Maria CantwellMaria CantwellUS wins aerospace subsidies trade case over the EU Wells CEO Stumpf resigns from Fed advisory panel Overnight Energy: Lawmakers kick off energy bill talks MORE (D-Wash.). The bill requires: companies to allow shareholders a greater role in nominations to a company’s board of directors; board members to be annually reelected; board members to receive at least 50 percent of a vote in uncontested elections, and public companies to create a separate “risk committee" with an independent board.

Feinberg plans to cap a months-long review process by announcing the cuts — along with new restrictions on corporate luxuries such as use of private jets, chauffers and even country club membership — at five financial firms and two auto companies. The seven companies are AIG, Bank of America, Chrysler, Chrysler Financial, Citigroup, General Motors and GMAC.

Schumer and Feinberg are both Brooklyn natives and longtime friends. A former chief of staff to the late Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), Feinberg chaired the Sept. 11 Victims Compensation Fund and often worked with Schumer.

Senate reaction to Feinberg’s plan mostly broke along party lines, with Democrats supporting the idea and Republicans arguing against government intervention in the private market. There was one notable exception: Sen. John McCainJohn McCainKerry: US 'on the verge' of suspending talks with Russia on Syria Trump, Clinton to headline Al Smith dinner Overnight Defense: Congress overrides Obama 9/11 veto | Pentagon breathes easy after funding deal | More troops heading to Iraq MORE (R-Ariz.), Obama’s 2008 rival for the presidency, said he supported the administration.

“I have no problem with greed being curtailed,” McCain said.

Most Republicans said just the opposite.

“I have a visceral reaction against so much government involvement in free enterprise,” said Senate Republican Conference Chairman Lamar AlexanderLamar AlexanderMcConnell: Cures bill a 'top priority' in lame-duck Lawmakers pledge push for cures bill in lame-duck Overnight Regulation: Lawsuits pile up against Obama overtime rule MORE (Tenn.)

“It’s a bad precedent,” said Sen. Pat RobertsPat RobertsGOP senators ask watchdog to examine Gitmo site surveys spending Senate panel approves pension rescue for coal miners Congress set for Saudi showdown with Obama MORE (R-Kan.). “You have government determining the pay of a company that may be in the business of trying to get the best employees they can to save the company. It’s very competitive out there. I’m not waving flags for people to get excessive pay or golden parachutes — what I object to is the government making that decision.”

Some Republicans are more ambivalent.

“There’s no question we’re way too involved in these companies, but on the other hand these companies are on the taxpayer dole,” said Sen. Bob CorkerBob CorkerOvernight Defense: GOP leaders express concerns after 9/11 veto override | Lawmakers press for Syria 'plan B' | US touts anti-ISIS airstrikes Dem leaders defend overriding 9/11 bill veto GOP leaders express reservations a day after 9/11 veto override MORE (Tenn.). “Hopefully the outcome of all this is that companies are very wary about becoming involved with the federal government.”

In March, Schumer led the charge to force AIG to return most of $165 million in taxpayer money that the firm spent on executive bonuses. In a floor speech and in comments to reporters, Schumer threatened to push through a law to tax the bonuses at up to 100 percent.

“To those of you getting these bonuses, be forewarned: you will not keep them,” Schumer said on the Senate floor.

Two days later, the House voted 328-93 for a 90 percent tax on bonuses awarded by corporations receiving more than $5 billion in bailout funds, aimed at executives who make $250,000 or more in total household income and bonuses paid or scheduled to be paid after Dec. 31, 2008. The Senate version of the bill levied a 70 percent tax.

The controversy dissipated within days, as 15 of the 20 highest-paid AIG executives agreed to return the bonuses.