THE HILL
 

AFL-CIO warns Reid against tax on high-cost healthcare plans in bill

By Alexander Bolton - 10/26/09 12:08 PM ET

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka warned Senate Democratic leaders not to include a tax on high-cost healthcare plans in a bill that is expected to reach the floor in coming days.

Trumka dismissed the notion that Democratic leaders could placate the powerful union by raising the threshold on plans that would be subject to the tax. Under the Senate Finance Committee’s bill, plans costing more than $8,000 for individuals and $21,000 for families would be hit with a 40 percent excise tax.

“Working families struggling to pay for healthcare should not be required to pay even more in the form of a new tax,” said Trumka in a telephone call with reporters. “When you fail to force [insurance] companies to be competitive and employers to pay their fair share, you have to come up with money elsewhere.

“It’s a bad policy, bad politics and totally unacceptable to put the cost of healthcare on the backs of working families,” he said.

Trumka’s press call came as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) took steps toward bringing the Senate bill to the floor.

Multiple media outlets reported Monday that Reid was sending legislation to the Congressional Budget Office for scoring. Reid has been working for nearly two weeks on combining different healthcare measures approved by the Senate Finance Committee and the Senate Health Committee.

Reid has scheduled a 3:15 press conference, during which he is expected to talk about what is in the final bill, which will reportedly include a public health insurance option that allows states to opt out.

Trumka also said his union does not support establish a national government-run health insurance program that allow states to opt out, which has emerged as a possible comprise in recent weeks.

Asked Monday if he would support the new “opt in/opt out” public option, Trumka said flatly: “No.”

However, he then qualified his statement, and said the emerging public option compromise is "on its way but it’s not there yet."

Trumka praised the House health bill as having a more effective public option and fairer financing compared to its Senate counterpart, which Trumka said would effectively tax middle-class workers through the tax on so-called “Cadillac plans.”

At the same time, Trumka expressed optimism that a deal will be reached on healthcare reform, saying the debate is “moving in the right direction.”

An AFL-CIO spokeswoman downplayed the idea that the proposed insurance tax has created friction between Reid and Trumka.

Amaya Tune noted that Trumka praised Reid for listening to union concerns.

"Senator Reid is working hard to lessen the impact of this tax and we appreciate his hard work on this," Trumka said, before giving a more enthusiastic endorsement of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), whom he touted as "doing a great job of crafting legislation that doesn't finance healthcare by taxing working families."

The AFL-CIO president, who took office in September, said that the opt-out provision in the Senate bill falls short of the “robust” public option the union supports, but suggested the provision is “on its way” toward being something the organization could support.

“We cannot be in favor of reform for reform's sake. This is the moment to make sure that it's real,” Trumka said. “The fight now is about what reform will look like.”

As the House and Senate bills near completion in each chamber, Trumka said that the AFL-CIO, along with the labor coalition Change to Win, would organize a push next Thursday, Nov. 5, in which union members will wage a public phone call campaign encouraging lawmakers to support their preferred outcomes in the health reform debate.

Eric Zimmerman and Michael O’Brien contributed to this story.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/64755-afl-cio-warns-reid-against-tax-on-high-cost-healthcare-plans-

Comments (19)

Sounds like trouble in paradise, or else really good phony outrage.BY Patrick Michael on 10/26/2009 at 13:27
I still fail to see why it should be the EMPLOYER's responsibility for insurance. Why not the INDIVIDUAL's? My employer doesn't pay my car, house or life insurance. Take the tax break away from the employer nad give it to me and let me find whats best for my family. Unfortunately I belong to a union and don't have that option. Actually I am forced to belong to 3 unions.BY Marty on 10/26/2009 at 13:48
It's the taxpayer's responsibility to fund the union's health care plan, why? Grow up, Trumka. You can't always get what you want.BY DIANNE on 10/26/2009 at 13:52
Communism in America has a name, and it is Richard Trumka.BY Rodrigo on 10/26/2009 at 14:02
Good question Marty. I expect Reed will roll over for the union thugs.BY PL on 10/26/2009 at 14:09
Reid and Obama created two enemies,the Trial Lawyers and the Insurance Institute.Both will feed the unions and voters false information.The premiums and coverage of unions depends on the costs passed on to the insurance companies. If you want to cut the costs,cut out the medical malpractice insurance,and use the peer review and abandon the present tort system which only benefits the lawyers and insurance agents.Union leadership will not lose their present position if they cannot "protect" benefits.They should know this:unions have not died in Europe or Canada or Japan.The union leadership will have to focus on saving jobs and salaries from the corporations who have decided they can hide money overseas.In fact this loophole is closing as we speak,for the UBS case proves the IRS can not only find the money,they will be able to tax it.The union pension funds should purchase shares to control the industries which is what has happened in other nations.For example,they should allocate carpenter and plumbers pension funds in real estate and public works contractors.Instead of allocating money to health care,why not subsidize their own members in housing purchases?This benefit can be controlled by union leadership.The same is true for farmers,and public service workers who seem lost without their medical benefits,and fail to ask their pension system for money in other areas,leaving the funds to stock brokers and bankers.BY tarheelchief on 10/26/2009 at 14:14
I pray that Obama's wrong and we're not experiencing an under-reported pandemic.BY Edward Craig on 10/26/2009 at 14:15
I think we are lucky to have such a calm, mature president. Thousands of people are dying from flu and war and he goes golfing.BY Willis on 10/26/2009 at 14:20
Why is anyone listening to what the Union wants! Start listening to what people want and we don't want the Democratic Health Reform Bill!!! I could care less about the Union and it takes some gall to publicly annouce what Reid will do and won't. It just shows you who owns Washington!!BY Debi on 10/26/2009 at 15:00
When belonging to a union, you pay them first above all else, and if you are laid off or plant shuts down , Union Reps. always have a job, while you stand in the unemployment lines. THINK ABOUT IT! Union are not what they used to be or what the would like you to believe they are.BY reti8red nurse on 10/26/2009 at 15:48

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.