THE HILL
 

Bipartisan stimulus extension fizzles

By Walter Alarkon - 10/27/09 05:59 PM ET

A push to extend multiple stimulus provisions fizzled Tuesday as Senate moves ahead on jobless benefits.


A bipartisan push to extend a number of provisions in the $787 billion stimulus fizzled Tuesday, with senators opting to move ahead with a simple extension of jobless benefits instead.

Democrats and Republicans had hoped to use the bill extending unemployement benefits by at least 14 weeks as the vehicle to extend other provisions set to expire this year. Senators from both parties had offered amendments that would have prolonged the $8,000 first-time homebuyer's tax credit and a tax provision allowing small businesses to write-off taxes on operating losses during the recession.

But senators voted 87-13 to cut off debate to the unemployment insurance bill and prevent consideration of amendments Tuesday evening. Final passage is expected this week.

Democrats pushed to cut off debate Republicans insisted on amendments that would have required unemployment insurance recipients to be screened for their immigration status against a federal database and would have restricted federal funding for the Association of Community Organizing for Reform Now (ACORN).

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) said that the extra amendments would have risked a delay in getting benefits to those hit hardest by the recession.

"We want to do this and if we add all kinds of stuff, then it goes back to the House and who know what happens," Brown said.

The Senate has voted several times already this year on similar ACORN and E-Verify amendments to appropriations bills, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) noted. Reid and Democrats sought to portray Republicans as opponents to further unemployment benefits during a recession, even though GOP senators have said that they could support an extension.

"The Republican response to helping the unemployed is two letters -- No," Reid said on the floor.

He told reporters that he wants to work with Republicans to extend the unemployment benefits and produce a healthcare bill, but he suggested that they're not willing partners.

"When I came here, we had Republicans and Democrats work together," Reid said. "But you can't dance if your partner is unwilling to get off the chair. It's like when I was in high school, I wanted to dance but she wouldn't get up."

The two parties had tried to work together on the other stimulus provisions. Reid was pushing for a package of six amendments to be considered with the unemployment benefits bill. It included several proposals to extend the homebuyer's tax credit that was sponsored by Reid, Sens. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.). The tax credit's supporters have said that it has helped spur on home sales, which have increased this year. Isakson's amendment, backed by Dodd, would extend the credit to June and would cost $16.7 billion.

Reid's amendment package also included two proposals by Baucus and Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.) extending the small business tax provision, known as the net operating loss carryback. The provision's backers, which included the National Association of Manufacturing and National Retail Federation, argued that it would help businesses save money during the crucial holiday shopping season and thus save jobs.

But Republicans objected to Reid's amendment package and offered their own. The GOP package called for the ACORN and E-Verify amendments and a proposal to pay for the unemployment benefits extension through bailout or stimulus money. The Democrats' bill would offset the $2.4 billion extension of insurance benefits by prolonging the federal unemployment tax, which is paid by all employers and is set to end this year.

The House has passed a bill that would extend unemployment benefits by 13 weeks in the states with jobless rates above 8.5 percent. The Senate's version extends the benefits by 20 weeks in the states with the highest jobless rates and by 14 weeks in other states.

Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) said last week that he expected several GOP members to back the extension of the unemployment insurance.

A Republican aide dismissed Democratic attacks, noting that they sought an agreement with Democratic leaders to allow amendments.

"Not only did Democrats wait until last Thursday to show us their proposal, they also blocked all attempts at an agreement from the beginning, objecting to every to every single one of our suggestions," the aide said.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) decried the Democrats' decision to block amendments as "power politics."

"I was prepared to discuss some sort of compromise, but we need some amendments," Sessions said.



Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/65087-bipartisan-stimulus-extension-fizzles-in-senate

Comments (27)

I would like the list of the Senators that said no to extending unemployment insurance. I see it passed 87-13 to bring up a bill to extend unemployment insurance. I would hate to be in the state that a Senator casted a no vote and was unemployed. I was watching on C-Span 2 and heard of course Orin Hatch (UT) voted no.Also the Senator from (SC) Graham voted no. I have a MA and BA and can't find a job.Don't these 13 Senators realize who is paying their salary! I am sure they voted yes to give Wall Street banks billions of dollars in the TARP bailout.Vote these Senators out and stand up for the American worker!!!BY Jack Mahoney on 10/27/2009 at 19:50
why in the [***] am i registered to vote? I watched the live house senate decide ther fate of the unemployed people, and it made me sick,their yeah and nay and their suits and toupees, are a disgrace for the ones that keep this country going. It's our blood ,sweat tears , not theirs, they sdtill go home to "steak lobster " , while we are "lucky" to have hamburger helper.BY green on 10/27/2009 at 19:58
The GOP continues to show that they love America, but hate most of the people living in it.BY Greg on 10/27/2009 at 20:16
the senators who could care less about the less fortunate Americans lets show them to the unemployment line Barrasso (R-WY)Bond (R-MO)Bunning (R-KY)Coburn (R-OK)Cornyn (R-TX) DeMint (R-SC)Enzi (R-WY)Graham (R-SC)Hatch (R-UT)Inhofe (R-OK) Johanns (R-NE)Sessions (R-AL)Vitter (R-LA)BY rich on 10/27/2009 at 21:34
do yall actually take time to read the article?They voted 87-13 to cut off debate. That has nothing to do with voting for the bill. They only need a simple majority to pass it. The Democrats voted to end the ability of Republicans to add amendments that would help safeguard the money and ensure it only went to actual citizens, green card holders, and naturalized people. And to prevent ACORN from getting its grubby little hands on the money. My wife is out of work now since May, 6 mos, layed off from an Advertising company, and she has found 2 part time jobs and volunteers. Don't tell me there aren't jobs out there.Unemployment is fine to take while it is available, because you and I paid into it, but please don't come to depend on it. throw your crutches away and go forth and prosper.BY TODD on 10/27/2009 at 21:35
87-13. Thankfully, 87 were willing to set aside their differences for now for the good of their constituents and the US. I agreed with many of proposed amendments, but streamlining the process was a no-brainer here. 87 Senators did the right thing here, and all 13 of the holdouts would never have voted yes, even with the amendments. To "Green", I agree with your feelings, but thankfully, in TN, our two Republican senators listened to their constituents, and were among the 87. After being one of probably thousands who contacted our senators, I am a little less cynical about the process today than I was 24 hours ago.BY R Becker on 10/27/2009 at 21:41
Rich, I believe that when the actual vote occurs, both SC Senators will vote to extend benefits. Sen DeMint and Sen Schumer (D-NY) were two of the original Senate proponents of extending benefits several weeks ago, and both Senators probably held out on cloture to include the ACORN amendment. SC has an 11.6% unemployment rate, and now that debate has ended, both are likely to go along with the extension.BY R Becker on 10/27/2009 at 21:59
R. Becker - totally agree with both your posts. The reason they wanted the Acorn amendment in there is that the first "ban" is scheduled to expire Oct. 31st - it was only temporary!BY Joanne M on 10/27/2009 at 22:15
Thanks, Joanne, I was unaware of the ACORN ban's expiration. Republicans might still insist upon extending the ban in any subsequent legislation to extend the stimulus (I don't believe this has really "fizzled", regardless of what this article implies). Senators will be in a very tough position to defend ACORN in any less sensitive legislation than one designed to extend unemployment benefits.BY R Becker on 10/27/2009 at 22:36
We need the List of the Senator, that Voted No, on Unemployment admentment,This is Just for the Record,On My House (miami florida) there are 3 Votes against the Senators that Represent us, on the Congress,Whatso ever, i'm going to convince the friends i have, and i know that they vote for "x" Senators that Vote Today again Us., They are going to be a Losser on Next Election (at least on my House they loose 3 votes, FOR SURE!!)BY Andy  on 10/27/2009 at 22:44

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.