THE HILL
 

Reid doesn’t have health votes — yet

By Alexander Bolton and J. Taylor Rushing - 10/27/09 07:19 PM ET

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is short of enough votes to pass a Senate healthcare bill with a government-run health insurance option with only Democratic support.

An early indicator of the challenge Reid faces came within hours of his announcement that he would include the contentious public option in the bill he intends to bring to the Senate floor in the coming weeks.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, the Democrat-turned-Independent from Connecticut, said Tuesday that he opposed a final vote to end debate on the healthcare bill because of the public option, even Reid’s modified version that allows states to opt out.

Several centrist Democrats, such as Sens. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), Evan Bayh (Ind.) and Blanche Lincoln (Ark.), have declined to say whether they would vote to allow the healthcare debate to begin on the Senate floor. They are waiting for a cost estimate from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and a chance to review the bill before making a decision.

Reid has held a series of meetings with Senate Democratic and Republican centrists and feels confident that he will have enough votes to bring a healthcare bill up for debate on the Senate floor. He is gambling that Lieberman or perhaps a Republican can be persuaded to vote to cut off a GOP filibuster and move to a final vote on the bill after several weeks of debate.

“Folks, why don’t we wait, take this one step at a time,” Reid said when reporters asked him how realistic it was to expect a healthcare reform bill with a public option to pass the Senate.

Some of Lieberman’s Democratic colleagues were surprised and irritated to hear of his intention to help filibuster a healthcare bill that includes a public option.

But Reid was careful to praise Lieberman, who has a history of vexing members of his former party.

“I have the greatest confidence in Joe Lieberman’s ability as a legislator,” Reid said Tuesday afternoon. “And he will work with us when this gets on the floor, and I’m sure he’ll have some interesting things to do in the way of an amendment.

“But Joe Lieberman is the least of Harry Reid’s problems,” Reid added.

Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), a champion of the public option, dismissed the possibility that Lieberman may face retaliation for his stance.

Lieberman’s support is crucial because Sen. Olympia Snowe (Maine), the only Republican to vote for any Democratic healthcare bill this Congress, has said she would oppose legislation that included the public option.

Lieberman has promised Reid that he would vote with Democrats to bring the bill up for debate, a procedural motion that requires 60 votes. That action and a motion to cut off an expected GOP filibuster to vote on final passage, which also requires 60 votes, are the two biggest obstacles to passing healthcare reform through the Senate.

Lieberman has said he will vote against cutting off debate if the healthcare reform bill includes a public option.

“We’re trying to do too much at once,” Lieberman said. “To put this government-created, government-run insurance company on top of everything else is just asking for trouble for the taxpayer, for the premium payer and for the national debt. I don’t think we need it now.”

Lieberman also said he would likely vote against a public option even if its implementation were delayed by a trigger — something Snowe and Nelson said they are open to.

Reid has tried to entice centrists to support the public option by allowing states to opt out of the federal program. That concession, however, failed to placate Lieberman, who said “it still creates a whole new federal government entitlement program, for which taxpayers will eventually be on the line.”

Reid told reporters Monday that he expected to have enough votes to begin the debate but he’s not taking any chances after losing a pivotal vote to begin debate last week on a bill boosting Medicare payments to doctors.

“There are members that have serious concerns that are specific to their states or specific to their own set of values,” said Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.). “Harry has been literally sitting down face to face with senator after senator, working through these differences.”

Reid is taking all the whipping duties on his own shoulders. As of Tuesday morning, he had yet to ask Durbin to begin corralling votes to kick off the healthcare debate, and he has not yet asked President Barack Obama to begin working the phones.

Sen. Kent Conrad (N.D.), one of the strongest Democratic critics of the public option, praised Reid for endorsing a government-run plan that would direct the administrator to negotiate reimbursement rates with healthcare providers instead of pegging payments to Medicare rates.

Conrad said that the residents of states that opted out of the government-run program could still participate in membership-run healthcare cooperatives under Reid’s plan.

Durbin said that a state could opt out of the federal health plan if its legislature passed a law to do so and the governor signed it. Reid said Monday that states would have until 2014 to opt out of the national program.

Other details have yet to be shared, such as whether states could opt back in to the public option after opting out.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/65105-reid-doesnt-have-health-votes-yet

Comments (7)

Man, these commies just won't quit with trying to own a chunk of healthcare along with the banks and car companies. Why don't they just allow insurance companies to compete across state lines? How about a cap on lawsuit payouts? Simple, because it would work and the government doesn't usurp their piece of it. Commies.BY Pete on 10/28/2009 at 04:40
So much of the debate on healthcare is in the wrong areas. The issue of the employer mandate was basically killed by democrats in thrawl to the unions, but what interests me more is why nobody is talking about the health insurance companies' exemption from anti-trust laws under the 1948 McCarran-Ferguson act. Leahy introduced it last month and it made one day of press and disappeared. Surely this is a more important, and simpler point than the baroque measures involved in the bills so far. The reason the health insurance market doesn't work is that it isn't a market - this law makes it legally a cartel, and free-market republicans should resent that just as much as "commie" (to quote Pete, above) democrats. Pete makes a good point about cross border business, by the wayBY LMCarver on 10/28/2009 at 06:18
Sen. Harry Reid, I pray to GOD that your proposal DOES NOT PASS, and YOU DO NOT GET THE VOTES you need to force upon the American People something we clearly DO NOT WANT…BY FRANK COLLATT on 10/28/2009 at 10:10
Sen. Harry Reid, I pray to GOD that your proposal DOES PASS, and YOU DO GET THE VOTES you need to give the American people what a clear majority (around 65% in most polls) of us DO want and NEED…BY Michael on 10/28/2009 at 19:43
What we need is single-payer. Yes, Medicare for all! How many households go bankrupt because of medical related issues in countries that have a universal health care system? ZERO! Health care is a right, not a privilege.Let me ask you this… What do insurance companies bring to the table? What good are they?BY Jeremy on 10/28/2009 at 21:23
Why won't someone press hard on the Congress to respond to the question - "Why will Congress be exempt from the bill?" No matter what form it takes, they should be held accountable to answer that question, and I don't believe there is an answer. They should either include themselves or shut up! Why won't anyone have spine enough to push them on this? It comes up, then peters out and dies off. I'm sick of all the weasels out there! No wonder Obama is in "charge." There is no real leadership, so they had to hire an actor to play the role.BY Carolyn Troiano on 10/29/2009 at 12:55
Like many others I feel that we should improve our current healthplan instead of rebuilding the wheel. Let us pick a insurance healthcare plan across state lines, do something about the medical lawsuits and improve the eligilabily requirements. We can't continue giving something for nothing. Lastly, why is the administration and the Dem. leadership so head strong about passing a bill that has failed everywhere else i.e. Hawaii, Maine, Mass., etc. What do they get out of it to push so hard?BY Tom N on 10/29/2009 at 17:04

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.