THE HILL
 

Reed: Pentagon should prep for cuts

By Roxana Tiron - 10/28/09 02:08 PM ET

Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), an Army veteran and senior defense authorizer, on Wednesday said that the Pentagon will have to face “painful adjustments” in its budget.

Reed, the new chairman of the Senate Armed Services Seapower panel, indicated that weapons modernization will suffer in years to come as a result of military operations in Afghanistan, but also because of the economic crisis.

The Democrat said that he does not believe the defense budget will be increased, but acknowledged that the Pentagon will incur significant costs paying for the military personnel alone.

“It is going to be a difficult time,” he said at a breakfast with reporters.

“There is going to be significant pressure on the defense budget going forward. […] I do not think there is going to be much relief on the personnel front … so the likely path is to push and delay platforms that you do not think are absolutely essential,” he said. Additionally, he said, weapons programs that continue likely will have to be reduced and bought in smaller numbers, in what will be “painful adjustments” for the Department of Defense.

“There is a domestic crisis now that is requiring significant unexpected resources and then the good news is when we fix it then we have the challenge and opportunity to fix the deficit,” Reed said. “That is tough going.”

Meanwhile, sending more troops to Afghanistan “is going to be very expensive and that has to be explicitly indicated … It’s in the billions of dollars,” he said. The costs would also add significantly when considering the large need for civilian experts on the ground there.

Reed also supports shifting money from the Pentagon budget to help boost the civilian aid agencies, such as the U.S. Agency for International Development. Civilian aid is a much- needed ingredient in Afghanistan, but also Iraq, said Reed.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/65229-reed-pentagon-should-prepare-for-deep-budget-cuts

Comments (8)

The country has a covenant with its soldiers to include equipment, research and development, and operational testing and evaluation. We cannot return to the days of hollowing out the force which followed Vietnam. Technology is what enables us to use much smaller forces than in the past, the force multiplier. And Military equipment provides jobs across the nation and much of it is leading edge stuff which later has big time private sector benefits—like the internet. If the Democrats cut DOD to expand dysfunctional social programs and to make government bigger it would be worse than a mess. Senator Reed's idea on the heels of the F-22 cancellation and the missile defense cutbacks tells you just how wrongheaded the Democrats are on National Security force structure which is needed to save lives and shorten wars.BY graham on 10/28/2009 at 21:22
Now he's worried about the budget, where was his NO vote when it came to all this out of control spending in Washington. Sen Reed, our state is over 13 percent unemployment, your stimulus bill did nothing for us and companies are closing their doors because of the business climate here. Let's stop the funding for things like ACORN and address the budget and stop the wasteful spending and concentrate on us. The military is in the middle of two wars and the last thing they need to here from its government is you have to cut cost.BY Roger Peck on 10/28/2009 at 23:12
Jack Reid…is a classic example why insurgent activity inside of the United States is increasing. A overly paid douche bag who only looks after his own self interests, and not the countries. I wonder if he really knows where usaids money winds up? And one thing for sure, I bet he doesn't. See it was usaids money that helped massacre thousands of Somalians by giving food to warlords through world aid programs.(not securing food shipments and and allowing them to be captured there fore helping the enemy to kill thousands is kind of like war crimes, don't cha think?)in 1990-1995. Its douche bags like this who make me wonder if maybe we should be fighting on the other side…because if he wants to gut my safety and protection just to further his own bribed agenda, then its high time we rebelled.BY Harry Potter on 10/29/2009 at 09:01
I think it is time to face facts. We can't afford to have troops in over half the countries in the world. Our days of Empire are over.BY James Green on 10/29/2009 at 09:02
What a surprise!!! With a far-left President and a Democrat-controlled Congress led by its left-wing, the Defense budget will be hurt. Amazing. Even with two wars, a potential for conflict against Iran or North Korea, simmering conflicts in the Middle East and Africa, and both Russia and China rebuilding their military machines, we will face the future with our hands tied. The only super in our super-power status will be the size of the deficit for unaffordable entitlements and silly climate change impediments to our economy.BY Edward Will on 10/29/2009 at 10:33
China isn't paying anymore for our trillion dollar per year defense spending.I'm not sure that the miliary knows that or cares.But if they don't wake up soon they will be defending the Roman Empire.America is in free fall and I guess the Defense Department wants to be the main cause of it.BY Tom on 10/29/2009 at 10:51
Senator Reed is a true statesman. He knows the military better than any other Senator. I trust him to tell it like it is, and thankfully he's no warmonger.BY katse on 10/30/2009 at 14:27
It is easy to differentiate those that care about the progress of the American Nation alone and in the world for our protection and yes the protection of others. Senator Reid is not among the those caring individual. Neither do some of the above comments.indicate such concern. I wonder if this notification is an indication, also, that the necessity for 40,000 troops in Afghanistan is not appropriate either.BY Susan Tenofsky on 11/11/2009 at 10:37

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.