THE HILL
 

Surgeons oppose Senate healthcare bill

By Jeffrey Young - 11/04/09 03:08 PM ET

The American College of Surgeons and 19 other groups representing surgeons delivered a letter Wednesday stating their opposition to the Senate's healthcare reform legislation.

"We are writing today to reiterate our serious concerns with several provisions that were included in the health care reform bill that was considered by the Senate Finance Committee and to let you know that if these concerns are not adequately addressed when a health care reform package is brought to the Senate floor, we will have no other choice but to oppose the bill" (emphasis theirs), says the letter, signed by the American College of Surgeons and numerous societies of specialty surgeons and addressed to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

Though Reid has yet to unveil the version of the bill the Senate will debate, the surgical societies base their rejection on the measure approved by the Finance Committee last month.

The critical dispatch from American College of Surgeons contrasts sharply with its July endorsement of the House's original healthcare reform bill. The surgeons, like the American Medical Association (AMA) and other physician groups, backed the House measure in large part because it included a permanent reform the Medicare's broken payment system for doctors, which must be adjusted by Congress each year to prevent steep cuts.

The surgeons object to funds for surgeons being redirected to primary care physicians; a proposal to create an independent commission on Medicare payment policy that would not require congressional action to take effect; requirements that doctors participate in a quality measurement program; and other components of the Finance Committee bill.

Furthermore, the groups protest the Senate's decisions to not enact a permanent reform to the Medicare payment system and to not enact limits on lawsuits for medical malpractice.

The medical groups make clear they have stated their objections to senators in the past but have not had them rectified. "Since late last year and as recently as last month, the surgical community has on multiple occasions offered detailed comments on how the Senate’s policy options and legislative proposals can be amended," the letter says.

“There are ways to improve quality, cut costs and increase patient access — but the Senate isn’t hearing those of us who are closest to the patient and work in the system every day,” Brent Eastman, chairman of the College's board of regents and the chief medical officer at Scripps Health, said in a statement.

President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats have intensely sought the support of physicians for their healthcare reform efforts — so far, to little effect.

House Democrats initially secured a key endorsement of their healthcare reform bill from the AMA and a handful of other medical societies this summer. But when the House Democrats removed provisions to fix the Medicare payment system from their overall reform bill and introduced separate legislation, the AMA withheld its endorsement. Likewise, Reid failed in his gambit last month to move a $240 billion bill to reform physician pay because he could not win votes from Democrats who objected to increasing the budget deficit.

The AMA and the American College of Surgeons were among a coalition of physician lobbying groups who agreed to help Reid pass the so-called doctor-fix bill, reportedly in exchange for their support of healthcare reform.

In contrast to the surgeons' criticisms of the Senate legislation, the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Osteopathic Association endorsed the House's healthcare reform bill this week, though both groups link their endorsement to the passage of a separate bill to address Medicare payments.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/66357-surgeons-oppose-senate-healthcare-bill

Comments (11)

Obama doesn't care what you think unless you are for his Health Rationing bill. He doesn't care about the citizens of this country or he would tell his people to throw it out and come up with a bill less than 200 pages and not adding to the deficit trillions of dollars and making the health system a joke. If Obama cared about the citizens he would take care of social security, medicare, medical, post office, amtrack all are near bankrupt and corrupted by the vary people that has come up with this job killing, bankrupting monstrosity, adding 110 new departments and more federal employees adding to the deficit and killing the insurance industry. They are just interested in POWER and screw the citizens!BY William on 11/04/2009 at 15:44
To William: It was 8 years of G.W. Bush and the Republicans that has created the initial deficit and their friends on Wall Street and the Banks the created the financial melt-down.And by the way, try spell check and installing "Dictionary" software—you would benefit tremendously.BY alexnsfbay on 11/04/2009 at 16:38
Democrats ran Fannie Mae and donated campaign cash to tope Democrats. One of the main defenders for FM was Re. Barney Frank who was a recipient of $40,000. He was once romantically involved with FM executive. In 1991, Frank and Rep. Joe Kennedy lobbied for FM to soften the rules on multi family home mortgages although the dwellings showed a default rate twice that of single family homes.Frank opposed giving the Bush admin. in 2003, the right to approve or disapprove business activities that could pose a risk to taxpayers. Freddie and Fannie would not have prospered as long as they dis without the help os Fran, Sen Schumer and Dodd. The list of blames lays on Democrats as well, so enough about Bush.BY bailedout on 11/04/2009 at 21:17
Each day goes by, we learn of more people and groups standing up against this bill and support fading. The only people that want this to pass are those that don't have to pay for it and those that will get rich from it.BY rogpeck on 11/05/2009 at 00:01
BY rogpeck on 11/05/2009 at 00:01…Well stated and you are correct…Unfortua tely should this pass the taxpayers will be saddled with this heavy cost.BY bailedout on 11/05/2009 at 00:12
Yes, we want to preform as many unnecessary surgeries on you as we can. How dare the Government try to cut into our business. We have kids to feed, Country Clubs to join, and more breast to implant.BY Josh on 11/05/2009 at 07:36
I'm just worried we'll end up with the same sorry mess that Medicare and Medicaid is in. The sadder thing is everyone will have to sacrifice to reform health care and everyone refuses to do so. The doctors and hospitals don't want to give up any pay, the taxpayers don't want to pay anymore, the Medicare beneficiaries don't want to give up any benefits or pay anymore, the uninsured don't want to be forced to be insured. With this standoff, I don't see how the bill can go anywhere.BY seaslue on 11/05/2009 at 09:26
LOOKING FOR SMART DOCTORS: Has anyone figured out how to make cash medicine strategies work in a medical practice? If you have, tell us what youBY Skrueger on 11/05/2009 at 09:47
Has anyone figured out how to make cash medicine strategies work in a medical practice? If you have, tell us what youBY skrueger on 11/05/2009 at 10:29
The public option is rooted in nothing more than the intellectual laziness of Congress and the Administration - the intellectual laziness that comes from the conclusion that government has to be the answer for every social/societal ill. A letter from HEW (April 1959) to the House Ways and Means Committee remains germane: In our society the existence of a problem does not necessarily indicate that action by the Federal Government is desirable. The basic question is: Should the Federal Government at this time undertake a new program to help pay the costs of medical careBY Thomas Reid III MD on 11/07/2009 at 18:23

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.