THE HILL
 

Dems poised to move $33B in business tax credits from stimulus

By Walter Alarkon and Silla Brush - 11/05/09 06:00 AM ET

Democrats anxious about high unemployment have shifted gears and are poised to expand a stimulus provision that would quickly put $33 billion in the pockets of businesses.

The Senate on Wednesday approved a tax break that allows firms to carry back losses to get refunds on taxes paid over the past five years, and the House is expected to follow. The tax provision is packaged with a bill extending unemployment benefits.

Business groups had pushed for the five-year carry-back provision during the debate over the 2008 stimulus bill signed by President George W. Bush, but were blocked by House Democrats who argued it would have helped businesses more than individuals.

Now, with unemployment expected to hit 10 percent this fall and possibly as early as Friday’s jobs report, Democrats have embraced the provision as a way to spark employment ahead of next year’s elections.

A five-year carry-back “is one of the very few ways in the tax system you can actually put cash into the hands of business very quickly,” said Clint Stretch, director of tax policy at Deloitte & Touche.

In an interview, Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.), a senior member of the House Ways and Means Committee, cast the provision as an economic tool that should be used immediately.

He acknowledged that a number of businesses, including real estate agencies, bankers and retailers, will benefit from the tax break, but he said that it would also help individuals because it would prevent layoffs.

“It might not be a job creator, but it will save an awful lot of jobs,” Neal said.

House Democratic leaders plan to take up the package including the carryover provision the Senate passed Wednesday, Neal said.

Businesses may already carry back losses for two years. The $787 billion economic stimulus bill approved earlier this year expanded that provision to allow small businesses with less than $15 million in gross receipts to get refunds on profits from the past five years.

Under the measure written by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), all businesses would get carry-back for five years.

The Joint Committee on Taxation said that the broader carry-back provision would save businesses $33 billion in 2010 and would cost the government $10.4 billion over the next decade.

The carry-back expansion along with a tax credit for homebuyers will be paid for by delaying by seven years another tax break for U.S.-based international corporations that was scheduled to start in 2010.

Neal noted that White House economists Lawrence Summers and Jason Furman offered support for the plan this week when he spoke with them. The Obama administration included an expanded carryover provision in its budget proposal.

Still, some liberal lawmakers remain uneasy over broadening the tax provision. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) said that it’s not as critical as extending unemployment benefits that directly help out-of-work Americans.

“Things like the operating loss provision actually are slightly different,” Blumenauer said. “That just shifts revenue.”

The carryover won’t serve as stimulus and will only give more money to businesses, said liberal economist Dean Baker, the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

“It will have almost no impact on investment or employment,” Baker said. “It would be hard to think of expenditures that will have less impact on the economy.”

Business groups ramped up their campaign for a broader tax break after this year’s stimulus only provided the benefit to smaller businesses.

Homebuilders had been among the first to push for the tax provision, but a broader range of manufacturers, Realtors, restaurants, newspapers and other business interests took up the campaign in the late winter and spring. Lobbyists sent a letter to congressional lawmakers in April that was signed by more than 80 CEOs, and they held more than 100 fly-ins with tax executives and CEOs.

That helped lobbyists round up congressional supporters for the broader provision.

Support has been building steadily.

When a standalone carry-back bill was introduced in the House in May, it had five co-sponsors. The measure now has more than 180 co-sponsors. A companion bill started in the Senate with seven co-sponsors; it now has wide bipartisan backing from more than 44 senators.

House Republicans called for a five-year carry-back provision, among other stimulus measures, in a letter to President Barack Obama last month. Soon after, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that the carry-back idea “has some currency.”

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/66429-democrats-poised-to-move-33b-business-tax-provision

Comments (8)

Perhaps if they, the democrats, had not squandered billions in worthless "Stimulus' bills, tax cuts could be given. In fact, the country and consumers would have been better off if there had been a year long tax holiday for all taxpayers.WalterBY walter leon on 11/05/2009 at 08:17
Well well well. And Tuesday wasn't a wake up call? Zero didn't even pay attention to the results. What a shame that Tuesday had to trigger them to do the right thing.Millions are out of work and he has done nothing so far.Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice, I'm a Democrat LibTard.BY Larry on 11/05/2009 at 08:17
The Democrats will take all the credit ,although it wasn't their idea , fot whatever is passed. Cost the Government ? No , cost the taxpayers. As if we need to pay more…Emo Zipper 11.05.09BY Emo Zipper on 11/05/2009 at 09:42
Walter - maybe you didn't hear…over 1/3 of the stimulus was tax cuts. everyone under $200,000 a year recieved a tax cut…not to mention the home buyers tax credit, etc. When are the supply siders going to quit whining about tax cuts…tax cuts are a form of spending. Look at the budget. Tax cuts add to the deficit just as much as spending. That is why spending needs to be matched with revenue, and tax cuts need to be matched with spending cuts. The easiest thing to do is to talk about tax cuts…the hardest thing to do is to talk about spending cuts. Every congressman wants to cut taxes…but NONE of them will cut spending…unless it is spending that doesn't affect their district…politics is local. Why do you think the bush tax cuts (no spending cuts to offset them) had a projected decrease of revenues of 1.4 billion and increase in federal outlays of 95 billion over the same period. Even Charlie Crist admitted that the stimulus money saved 20,000 teacher jobs in Florida…so we can cut taxes for Floridians or saved jobs for Teachers. You pickBY DJH on 11/05/2009 at 10:43
"""Perhaps if they, the democrats, had not squandered billions in worthless "Stimulus' bills, tax cuts could be given""" … There were almost $300 BILLION in tax breaks for businesses and individuals in the stimulus. Wake up Republicans!!!! WAKE UP!!!!!! Here's a small sample of tax breaks in the stimulus bill: http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/managingyourmoney/archives/2009/02/stimulus_bill_i.htmlBY Ethan on 11/05/2009 at 12:07
Funny how its taken the dems over a year to see the logic in tax cuts and credits. Now we get to hear how necessary and critical these measures are to the economy and saving jobs. Too bad that thought process was drowned out for so long by their own voices while they excorrigated republicans for suggesting these measures as a means to help. Now we can watch the self congratulatory original party of no speak about how these same measures (proposed by repub) are needed to help the public. Wouldn't this have had a better impact LAST YEAR to…um…you know save jobs. Farcical!BY Winfield on 11/05/2009 at 12:28
Haven't our politician learned anything? Supply side economics do not work and tax cuts for businesses do not create jobs or prevent the layoffs that politicians claim they do. What creates jobs and prevents layoffs is demand. Create jobs first and then demand follows. This has been proven over and over again in a economy in which we find ourselves. Put those federal dollars into job creation instead of tax cuts and it will go a lot further into uplifting the economy. How many times in history must we learn this fact? Tax cuts for businesses under GWB hurt our economy and created more debt than it did create jobs. Unless of course you consider starting two wars a legitimate way of creating jobs. Put the money into building high speed trains and rail in this country. Put the money into creating a more sustainable and updated electrical grid for the country. My god, tax cuts when we are already in the red? This is just money thrown into a big black hole that will not do anything overall.BY Julie on 11/05/2009 at 12:32
I noticed the interesting statement above: That "TAX CUTS" are just another form of SPENDING…Duhhhhh! How come no one has suggested that ALL FED GOVT. workers take a 10% pay cut, except military members active in the war zones, preping to go there, or only got back during the last 90 days!How about All those "extra" people hired up there at the WH??? AND, that includes all these Czar's???And, basically, in these times, why are we even considering messing with Cap-n-Trade or Healthcare???Seems our Congress have their heads firmly in the sand and just "don't care" about us normal, middle class, folks!BY MontanaMEL on 11/05/2009 at 13:32

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.