By Sam Youngman and J. Taylor Rushing - 11/11/09 12:32 AM EST
Senate Democrats and Republicans split along party lines on Tuesday amid reports — denied by the White House — that President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaDems celebrate anniversary of gay marriage ruling Cannabis conversation urged at North American Leaders Summit Obama: 'There's still work to do' for gay community MORE has made a final decision on a troop surge in Afghanistan.
Republican Senate leaders blasted reports from both CBS News and The Associated Press that Obama is leaning toward recommending slightly fewer than the 40,000 troops said to be requested by Gen. Stanley McChrystal, commander of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan.
Obama is scheduled to meet with his national security team on Wednesday to discuss strategies for moving forward in Afghanistan — the eighth such meeting this year.
“If you have a military strategy, it seems to me you need a military force compatible with attaining that strategy,” said GOP Policy Chairman and Armed Services Committee member John ThuneJohn ThuneRepublicans question Trump's trip to Scotland Short-term FAA bill would likely extend into next year, GOP chairman says Civil liberties group mobilizes against surveillance amendment MORE (S.D.). “If you have military commanders in the field and you undercut what they need, you have the possibility to put success at risk.”
But Democrat Jack ReedJack ReedOvernight Defense: Biden hits Trump on national security | Dems raise pressure over refugees | Graham vows fight over spending caps Graham: Opponents of lifting military spending caps are 'a-holes' Senate unlikely to vote on military cyber measure MORE (R.I.), a senior member of the Armed Services Committee, embraced Tuesday’s reports.
“There has been very careful deliberation about this,” Reed told The Hill. “I have to think [Obama] looked at everything.”
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs rebuffed the CBS and AP stories, saying that a final decision on Afghanistan is still weeks away.
“I don’t know that it’s annoying as much as it is generally amusing to watch somebody or some group of people decide they know what only the president knows,” Gibbs said.
Gibbs added that anyone telling the press that the president has made a decision “doesn’t have, in all honesty, the slightest idea what they’re talking about.”
National Security Adviser Gen. James Jones also pushed back, saying late Monday night that all press reports that say Obama has made a decision, or almost made a decision, are false.
Amid the uncertainty, Reed and other Democrats were wary in their responses, but struck a common theme: Whatever Obama’s decision, it should be comprehensive and it should include Congress.
“The question of troops is always the first factor looked at, but it’s only one factor,” said Reed. “There are lots of other factors, including the state of the government there.”
Republican leaders said much the same, urging Obama to explain his decision in front of them.
“I hope he makes it soon, because there’s 68,000 men and women at risk right now,” said Senate Republican Conference Chairman Lamar AlexanderLamar AlexanderBipartisan gun measure survives test vote Overnight Healthcare: GOP plan marks new phase in ObamaCare fight Stoddard: The great Trump rebellion MORE (Tenn.). “And he needs to come to Congress and explain it.”
Sen. Richard Lugar (Ind.), ranking Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, said he believes Obama may be forced to deploy the troops over a yearlong period — as Tuesday’s reports suggested — because only about 15,000 troops are currently available.
The president flew to Fort Hood, Texas, on Tuesday to meet with the families of those killed during last week’s shooting. Gibbs said that when Obama makes his decision, he will “take the time to explain that decision and his reasoning to the American people.”
Gibbs said there has been no decision made on how Obama will do that.