THE HILL
 

Republican lawmaker says he was denied access to McChrystal

By Molly K. Hooper - 11/13/09 06:55 AM ET

A Republican member on the House Armed Services Committee is claiming he was denied access to Gen. Stanley McChrystal on a recent fact-finding trip to Afghanistan.


Rep. Jeff Miller’s (R-Fla.) accusation comes as President Barack Obama is close to announcing whether he will endorse McChrystal's recommendation of sending about 40,000 additional troops to the war-torn country.

Since McChrystal's proposed solution to the escalating conflict in Afghanistan was leaked to the media in late September, some Republicans have grumbled that the Defense Department has curbed McChrystal's availability to lawmakers who support his request for more reinforcements.

Miller, who sits on both the Armed Services panel and the Intelligence Committee, told The Hill that the Pentagon denied his request for a meeting with the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan.

The top-ranking Republican on the Intelligence oversight subcommittee was in Afghanistan in mid-October.

“I wasn’t allowed to [meet with him]. I was there for four days, asked to meet with Gen. McChrystal and was told I couldn’t, although Sen. [Daniel] Inouye [D-Hawaii] met with him and Sen. John Kerry [D-Mass.] met with him,” Miller said in an interview.

Miller, who is serving his fifth term, stressed that McChrystal was in Afghanistan when he was there.

“I said I’d meet with him anywhere,” Miller said, sarcastically adding, “that’s OK … I’m just on HASC [the House Armed Services Committee] and Intel.”

His colleague, Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), the chairwoman of the Intelligence oversight subcommittee, led the delegation. As the lead lawmaker on the congressional delegation trip, or codel, it was her responsibility to formally make the request.

Though Miller concedes that Schakowsky asked for meetings, she wasn’t as “insistent” as he would have liked.

“I really wanted to meet with McChrystal,” Miller said.

Schakowsky’s office did not respond to a request for comment for this article.

The Illinois lawmaker is leading an investigation into whether the George W. Bush administration fully informed lawmakers with security clearances of "significant intelligence activities."

According to Miller's office, the codel spent time in Kabul and Kandahar, but the official purpose of the Intelligence Committee trip is classified.

Miller is not the only Republican who is frustrated with regard to securing access to McChrystal. Rep. Duncan Hunter (Calif.), who served in both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, did not meet with McChrystal during a brief fact-finding visit.

Hunter was more conciliatory than Miller about not having face-time with the commander on the ground because his trip coincided with a visit by Central Command head Gen. David Petraeus and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The freshman, whose father used to chair the Armed Services Committee, was one of the first House lawmakers to ask the White House to allow McChrystal to testify to Congress on his request for 40,000 additional troops.

Liberal Democrats, notably Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), have suggested that the country can't stomach sending additional forces to the region.

Over two months ago, House Armed Services Chairman Ike Skelton (D-Mo.) asked for McChrystal to appear before the committee.

That request was echoed by top GOP leaders in the House and Senate.

Asked on Saturday whether the Defense Department purposefully decided not to allow McChrystal to meet with House GOP lawmakers, Skelton said he had not heard of the accusation, but indicated he would check into the matter.

The White House and the Department of Defense did not comment for this article.

Skelton is in the minority of House Democrats who fully support McChrystal’s request for what some have called a second “surge,” similar to the strategy executed by Petraeus in Iraq.

Republicans, including Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (Ariz.), have made clear that they would support the president if he asks for resources to fund a strategy. They have also warned they may not support any troop request that is fewer than 40,000 troops.

While House Republicans have not recently met with McChrystal, GOP senators have been granted access to the general over the past few weeks. Sens. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), George LeMieux (R-Fla.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) sat down with McChrystal on their recent trip to the country.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/67619-gop-lawmaker-says-he-was-denied-access-to-mcchrystal

Comments (13)

Rep Miller has the necessary credentials, armed services panel and intelligence committee, he should be allowed to meet with the military commander. The only reason for blocking him is to prevent information that could be damaging or embarrassing to the Administration, from being exposed.BY Mark X on 11/13/2009 at 07:38
How can a high ranking member Republican member on the House Armed Services Committee be denied access to a top Commander in this war? What a slap in the face to someone who has dedicated his life to serve this country!!! What has happened to our country that only radicals are granted rights and conservatives are called unamerican???BY Joe on 11/13/2009 at 09:39
Jeff Miller had no need to meet with McChrystal since most of what McChrystal planned had been leaked to the press.Miller is a first rate wanker. A know nothing, do nothing Florida panhandle Republican, who voted with Bush 100% percent of the time. Why would he be granted face time?We have a new President, and the decisions that will be made regarding Afghanistan are his to make. I know that is terribly hard for the Republicans to take, but there it is. Those of us who are sick or war, sick of the no accountability, the no willingness to work with the new administration, read these types of articles and hear nothing but whining, once again.2012 will be very interesting if the Republicans do not get their party in order.BY Lori on 11/13/2009 at 10:06
Lori-I guess you are okay with the idea that Bush invaded Iraq because it was his decision to make? Speaking with members of Intel and HASC IS accountability. Listen to yourself and let me know if it sounds a bit like whining!BY Pencil Neck on 11/13/2009 at 11:26
I think I'd rather have the General doing his job than taking photo-op meetings with a member of the house or sneate. Bottom line is - If he didn't have the time, he didn't have the time. Love how the blame goes directly to the military and not the general. He's a big boy and I'm almost 100% certain he has a strong influence on his schedule.BY Major Mike on 11/13/2009 at 12:16
Pencil Neck-My point is that Jeff Miller has made himself quite clear on what he would have the President do regarding the war. He would continue it (terror!!), send the 40,000 plus troops in (death and dollars, but who cares??), and never consider an exit strategy (we never needed one before).Bush did invade Iraq as though it were his decision to make, and we were all anti Americans when we questioned him. He and his administration hawked their war on terrorism to the American public with far too many lies. And took us into war based on nothing but lies. Miller is a whiner, and as one of his constituents, I should know.I'll take a President who is thoughtful, and one who considers the opinions of many different and well qualified (Jeff Miller is not one them) people any day, over most of the Republicans who cry for more war, zero accountability, and then whine about the fact that no one is listening to them.If you consider my opinion whining, well so be it.BY Lori on 11/13/2009 at 12:18
This administration is cutting out the congress from every possible thing it can. Just look at all the czars and the power they are given without going through congress. This should be alarming to everyone American citizen.BY JLC on 11/13/2009 at 12:57
This is all petty partisan politics. This act is being brought to by the Democratic majority. I say act , because this was and is being handled as if it were the script for a "B" movie. The Democrats have projected their image of superiority with no regard for the fact that the public is taking notes on their progress. There is no common sense being used here. It's all being driven by the "EGO"S" of select group of Democrats. It's our party and you're not invited. Childish and dangerous behavior. On top of that our President is showing no sign of the capability of making an intelligent desision on anything pertaining to the war effort. His inabilities are showing. Our troops are the ones paying the price…Emo Zipper 11.13.09BY Emo Zipper on 11/13/2009 at 13:18
"Liberal Democrats, notably Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), have suggested that the country can't stomach sending additional forces to the region"Why does this 'No Account' get away with lying constantly?BY oldarz on 11/13/2009 at 15:01
Any congressman on the Armed Services Committee should be allowed to meet with anyone in the military. These people have a legitimate need for information in making decisions. Democrat or Republican. It shouldn't matter.BY protector20 on 11/13/2009 at 15:19

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.