THE HILL
 

McCain: Palin legal bill was for “troopergate”

By Alexander Bolton - 11/16/09 06:18 PM ET

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who spoke to The Hill Monday evening, denied Sarah Palin’s allegation that his campaign stuck her with a $50,000 legal bill to pay for the cost of vetting her as a potential vice presidential candidate.

McCain said the bill was for legal work related to allegations that Palin made improper use of her influence as Alaska’s governor to press for the dismissal of a state trooper named Mike Wooten. Wooten was embroiled in a custody dispute with Palin’s younger sister, Molly McCann.

“That was addressed by Trevor Potter,” said McCain, “That was over the troopergate.”

In a statement to the Associated Press, Potter, McCain's general counsel, denied that McCain’s campaign billed Palin for vetting her.

“To my knowledge, the campaign never billed Gov. Palin for any legal expenses related to her vetting and I am not aware of her ever asking the campaign to pay legal expenses that her own lawyers incurred for the vetting process,” he said.

Palin made the charge in her new book, "Going Rogue: An American Life," which listed a litany of complaints Palin had with McCain's campaign, such as its decision to limit her access to reporters. Palin also questioned how the campaign handled the announcement of her daughter's out-of-wedlock pregnancy.

McCain told The Hill that he nevertheless enjoyed Palin's book.

"I hope she sells lots of them," he said.

Palin received a $5 million advance from HarperCollins, according to the New York Times.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/67969-mccain-palin-legal-bill-was-for-troopergate

Comments (31)

Sarah lies. Just waiting for her true believers to start ranting. Should come soon.BY H Peters on 11/16/2009 at 18:58
At first AP misquoted Palin as saying she was billed $500,000. McCain staffers said she was never billed and her account was pure fiction. The story was corrected and the amount was changed to $50,000 and McCain staffers again said that was a lie and she was never billed.Now, the story has morphed yet again and it has become… yes, she was billed $50,000 dollars, but it was troopergate not vetting.Who is crawfisin' on this story? McCain's people, or Palin? Doesn't that in itself tell you something?BY joedoe on 11/16/2009 at 19:28
I guess that's where she gets the money to build new diggs between the house she lives in and the house she rents on the other side of her.Must be nice sucking money out of people under false pretenses,Too bad only the Deliverance people fell for itBY Y Coffey on 11/16/2009 at 19:29
She was vetted?!?!?!?BY Yelliott on 11/16/2009 at 19:30
A very incomplete statement by McCain…the unanswered question is who asked who to do what.If the expense was was approved by the republican campaign authorities, the cost should be borne by the campaign.BY BUBBA on 11/16/2009 at 19:35
I hope McCain feels like a complete ass for pandering to the religious right by picking this silly egomaniac as a running mate over more qualified candidates. Sarah is going to split up whatever is left of the "Reagan coalition," and for that we all owe her I guess!BY Katie on 11/16/2009 at 20:27
Sarah is a silly egomaniac? Good grief! What is that in the White House right now but a lightweight egomaniac? The amount of vetting that was done on him would have cost pocket change.BY Charie on 11/16/2009 at 20:52
Since McCain and Palin both have been caught in numerous lies, it's really hard to say who is lying with this story.Did Palin expect the McCain camp to pay her legal bills as she expected them to furnish her with expensive clothes for herself and family.BY Savanah on 11/16/2009 at 20:52
People have a very strange reaction to Palin. There is a vitriol that goes beyond anything that might be deemed a normal reaction to an average person, other than someone that might have done some heinous act directly toward their family members.The hate-filled reactions say nothing about Palin, but they sure do paint a very poor picture of those that continuously rant about the woman. Very strange…BY joedoe on 11/16/2009 at 20:54
People see Palin as a gushy personality rather than a serious candidate.Obama,on the other hand, is viewed as a very serious person…but he is much more of an egomaniac than Palin.BY BUBBA on 11/16/2009 at 22:46

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.