Republicans to grill Holder on Gitmo trials

Republicans senators plan to grill Attorney General Eric HolderEric H. HolderLawyer claims death threats after anti-Black Lives Matter lawsuit Adviser: Obama can’t ‘erase decades’ of racism Airbnb enlists civil rights leaders in discrimination fight MORE on Wednesday about his pledge not to allow the release of dangerous detainees into the United States.

Holder’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee marks the first time senators have had a chance to question Holder publicly since the Department of Justice announced its decision to try five terrorist suspects, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the self-described mastermind behind the Sept. 11 attacks, in U.S. courts.

Senators were deeply divided in their response to the announcement. Most Democrats praised the decision as a step toward restoring credibility to the U.S. justice system. Republicans denounced it for giving terrorism suspects the high-profile public attention they crave.

The GOP also is worried the move could allow detainees to be released in the U.S. on a technicality.

“[The administration’s Gitmo decision] was a result of unrealistic campaign promise,” said Sen. Jeff SessionsJeff SessionsTrump, Clinton discuss counterterrorism with Egyptian president GOP senators want immigration details on attack suspects GOP pressures Kerry on Russia's use of Iranian airbase MORE (R-Ala.), Judiciary’s ranking member. “Now that he’s in office, [President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaGreen Party nominee escorted off debate premises Obama defends work on tribal issues Charlotte requires race discussion Hillary, Democrats refuse to have MORE is] staying with that view even though it’s an unsound decision.”

Holder promised detainees would not be released into the U.S. in a written response to a question posed by Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.). The answer was included in a 55-page document obtained by The Hill in which Holder responded to several senators in advance of Wednesday’s hearing.

“Where we have legal detention authority, as the president has stated, we will not release anyone into the United States if doing so would endanger our national security or the American people,” Holder wrote. “There are a number of tools at the government’s disposal to ensure that no such detainee is released into the United States, all of which are currently being reviewed by the Special Interagency Task Force on Detention Policy ... ”

Holder did not respond to any of Sessions’s written questions, according to the document obtained by The Hill.

Sessions, a former U.S. attorney whose nomination to a district court was held up in the Senate when he was 38, has been one of the biggest obstacles to moving Obama’s judicial nominees through the chamber. On Monday, Sessions made clear that Democrats would have to muster 60 votes to move at least some of those nominees through.

But Sessions said Obama and Holder shouldn’t hold anything against him, especially considering that Republicans have a better record in approving Obama’s nominees than Democrats did with President George W. Bush’s judicial appointments.

On the detainee issue, Republicans want to know how the administration can claim that the trials in civilian courts are a true test of the country’s judicial process if detainees will be held regardless of the trials’ outcome.

Holder repeatedly dodged that question in a Friday briefing with reporters following the Justice announcement. Instead, Holder expressed confidence that the prosecutions would be successful.

“I’ve looked at the evidence. I’ve considered the problems that these cases present. And I am quite confident that we’re going to be successful in the prosecution efforts,” he told reporters.

“If I was concerned about the forum not leading to a positive result or if I had a concern — a different concern, you know — we would perhaps be in a different place,” he continued. “But the reality is — and I want to be as assuring as I can — that based on all of my experience and based on all of the recommendations and the great work and the research that has been done, that I am quite confident that the outcomes in these cases will be successful ones.”

Separately, House Republicans are launching efforts to prevent the trials in civilian courts. Intelligence Committee ranking member Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) told The Hill he will file a discharge petition to force a vote on legislation sponsored by House GOP Leader John BoehnerJohn BoehnerRepublican Study Committee elders back Harris for chairman Dems to GOP: Help us fix ObamaCare The disorderly order of presidential succession MORE (Ohio) that is intended to block efforts to transfer detainees to the U.S.

The House would have to vote on the legislation if the discharge petition is signed by a majority of members.

Rep. Louie GohmertLouie GohmertGOP rep calls Clinton 'mentally impaired' GOP rep: Trump ‘courageous’ for giving Cruz speech GOP bill would block undocumenteds from military service MORE (R-Texas) is also drafting legislation to require that suspected terrorists held at the Guantánamo detention center in Cuba be prosecuted in a military commission.

Sen. Orrin HatchOrrin HatchInternet companies dominate tech lobbying Senate panel approves pension rescue for coal miners Overnight Tech: GOP says internet fight isn't over | EU chief defends Apple tax ruling | Feds roll out self-driving car guidelines | Netflix's China worries MORE (R-Utah) said he plans to focus most of his questions in Wednesday’s hearing on the transfer of detainees to civilian courts.

“I like Eric Holder personally,” Hatch said, “but this is unjustified and just opens up all kinds of problems for our military and our courts.”

In a brief interview Tuesday, Kyl said he plans to ask Holder exactly what government tools the Justice Department has to prevent terrorist suspects from being released in the United States if they are found not guilty or if the trial is thrown out for procedural problems.
“That’s what we want to know — we want him to enumerate them,” Kyl said.

Kyl argues that U.S. civilian courts are not appropriate venues to handle international terrorism trials. During the trial of Omar Abdel Rahman, al Qaeda obtained valuable information about U.S. intelligence sources and methods, thereby making the job of fighting terrorists tougher, he said.

Sen. John McCainJohn McCainPundits react: Clinton won first debate Overnight Defense: Debate night is here | Senate sets vote on 9/11 veto override | Kerry, McCain spar over Syria Kerry fires back at McCain: I'm not 'delusional' MORE (R-Ariz.), who was directly involved in writing military commission legislation to deal with the trials of terrorism suspects, also wants to know how the administration plans to hold detainees if they are found guilty or if their cases are thrown out.

“I’d be curious to know exactly what tools they are talking about,” he remarked.

McCain predicted that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s trial will become a “long, drawn-out” spectacle, which will be “far worse than a show trial.”

Sen. Dianne FeinsteinDianne FeinsteinThis week: Shutdown deadline looms over Congress Week ahead: Election hacks, Yahoo breach in the spotlight Overnight Tech: Pressure builds ahead of TV box vote | Intel Dems warn about Russian election hacks | Spending bill doesn't include internet measure MORE (D-Calif.), the chairwoman of the Intelligence Committee and a member of Judiciary, supports Obama’s decision, although she has not been a vocal proponent.

After Holder’s Friday announcement, Feinstein was notably absent from the flurry of Senate reaction.

When asked directly what she thought about Mohammed being transferred to New York for trial, Feinstein said she thought the city was “well-equipped to handle the trial of known terrorists.”

Molly K. Hooper contributed to this story.