THE HILL
 

Senate Democrats take $849B step toward healthcare reform package

By Jeffrey Young - 11/18/09 10:29 PM ET

Senate Democrats made a significant stride toward achieving President Barack Obama’s goal of enacting a sweeping overhaul of the healthcare system with a bill that would spend $849 billion over 10 years to reduce the number of uninsured by 31 million people.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) introduced the bill Wednesday even as he continued to scramble to win over a handful of centrist Democrats who remain uncommitted. But Reid and other Democratic senators declared they had reached a pivotal moment in the debate.

“We’ve traveled really a long ways to where we are. Tonight begins the last leg of this journey we’ve been on now for some time,” Reid said.

With the House having passed its version of healthcare reform earlier this month, Obama is closer than any president has ever been to signing into law a major healthcare reform bill.

“Today we passed another critical milestone in the health reform effort,” Obama said in a statement.

Democrats invoked the memory of the late Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), who called healthcare reform the cause of his life. “I intend to ensure that we do everything we can to fulfill Ted Kennedy’s dream,” said Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (D-Iowa).

But it will take more than inspiration to achieve success on an issue that has stymied presidents since Teddy Roosevelt.

The healthcare bill, and Reid’s leadership of the effort, will face its biggest test yet Saturday, when the Senate will convene for a rare weekend session to hold a procedural motion on the legislation that stands as the first hurdle to advancing healthcare reform.

Even as Reid addressed the entire Senate Democratic caucus Wednesday evening and boasted about his bill, he could not say he had locked down the 60 votes he needs to ensure success on Saturday.

Centrist Democratic Sens. Mary Landrieu (La.), Blanche Lincoln (Ark.) and Ben Nelson (Neb.) continued to withhold promises to vote with Reid even after the trio sat down with the leader in his Capitol office. Reid received an assist Wednesday from Vice President Biden, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, a former senator from Colorado, and former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), the man who would have been Obama’s top healthcare adviser if he had not stepped aside amid controversy over unpaid taxes.

In a statement, Nelson hinted he might vote to advance the bill even if he did not support all of it but stopped short of declaring a position. “In reality, the meaning of the motion to proceed is very simple: It’s a motion to commence debate and an opportunity to make changes,” he said.

Over the course of more than a month, Reid worked through the challenge of melding separate healthcare reform bills passed by the HELP and Finance committees.

It was more than simply a legislative task. Though the two committee’s bills, like the measure passed this month by the House, employ the same basic structure, they emerged from vastly different political contexts. The HELP Committee bill was considerably more liberal in its aims and more expensive in its costs compared to the Finance Committee.

Moreover, Reid had to settle vexing political questions that still threaten to divide his party. To the chagrin of some centrist Democrats, the bill includes a form of the public option prized by liberals and trouble still brewing on explosive issues such as abortion and immigration.

Republicans remain solidly opposed to the Democrats’ bill, despite the majority’s hope they may eventually win the support of Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine).

“While Americans have been clear about their opposition to thousand-page bills for new government programs, it’s now abundantly clear that Democrats haven’t been listening,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said. “This is yet another trillion-dollar experiment, but it is not what Americans bargained for.”

The bill would bring the rate of legal U.S. residents younger than 65 with insurance to 94 percent by covering 31 million more people via health insurance exchange featuring private coverage and a new government-run public option plan and expanding Medicaid for the poor at a cost of $849 billion.

The health insurance exchanges in the states would take effect in 2014 and states would be permitted to opt out of the public option by passing a law to refuse it. People below 133 percent of the federal poverty level would be eligible for Medicaid. Those between 133 percent and 300 percent of poverty would receive subsidies and people between 133 percent and 400 percent of poverty would enjoy annual caps on premiums and out-of-pocket expenses as a percentage of income.

The bill also includes extensive new insurance regulations, including those that would limit companies’ ability to deny coverage or care, cancel policies for the sick, vary premiums on age, health status, gender and other factors.

Individuals would be required to obtain coverage or face a penalty. Employers with more than 50 workers would have pay a fee if they do not offer affordable coverage and their employees receive federal subsidies to purchase insurance on the exchange.

In addition, the legislation would reduce to federal budget deficit by $127 billion over 10 years, according to Congressional Budget Office (CBO) figures touted by Democrats. Moreover, in the second 20 years after the bill would take effect, deficit-reduction could reach a staggering $650 billion.

To pay for their bill and achieve deficit reduction, Democrats cut Medicare spending on payments to medical providers by more than $400 billion, in part by establish new payments systems designed to promote efficiency.

The bill also would raise $371.9 billion in new taxes over 10 years, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

The bulk of those new revenues -- $149.1 billion -- would come from a 40 percent excise tax on the value of health insurance plans above $8,500 for individuals and $23,000 for families. Reid scaled back this tax to allay concerns about Democrats and labor unions that it would ensare too many middle-class people.

Reid added a new proposal to the bill that would increase the Medicare payroll tax for high-income earners by 0.5 percent to 1.95 percent of adjusted gross income. This new tax would raise $54 billion and affect individuals making more than $200,000 or families earning more than $250,000.

Pharmaceutical, health insurance and medical device companies would be tapped for a combined $101.9 billion in taxes. The medical device fee was more than halved from an earlier proposal to $19.3 billion to respond to complaints from Democratic Sens. John Kerry (Mass.), Evan Bayh (Ind.) and others.

In addition, the bill includes a plethora of provisions designed to improve the quality and delivery of healthcare services by means such as promoting the use of preventive medicine.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/68553-senate-takes-849b-step-toward-healthcare-reform

Comments (24)

I sure hope Landrieu, Lincoln, and Nelson cannot be bought. I can't believe that they are arguing over a couple of items when the ENTIRE BILL is a horrible mistake. The costs will be devastating to this country and taxes will be added at the gov't whim. Hard working Americans will lose their current insurance. WE The People will be heard for sure in 2012.BY Kathi on 11/18/2009 at 23:01
Bring it on, KATHI. 2012 will be Obama vs. Palin, or Obama vs. Huckabee. Either way, Obama wins 46 states. GGBY Ben on 11/18/2009 at 23:24
What happened to the clarion calls of the demagogues,the Beck and Limbaugh apostles?Where art thou "Tea Party" ??? Is that "we the people " I heard?BY ted salladore on 11/18/2009 at 23:25
The Senate bill retains age discrimination on premiums, older folks will be paying 4 time more than younger people, many will not be able to afford this and will go without coverage and be subject to the fine. This bill is the worst of those produced thus far.BY John Reston on 11/18/2009 at 23:52
Kathi? LOL! You must be joking! We've ALREADY bought and paid for Nelson, Landrieu and Lincoln, so they'll vote against the bill. We're happy to have them in our pockets!BY Big Insurance Bigwig on 11/19/2009 at 00:13
"In addition, the legislation would reduce to federal budget deficit by $127 billion over 10 years, according to Congressional Budget Office (CBO) figures touted by Democrats. Moreover, in the second 20 years after the bill would take effect, deficit-reduction could reach a staggering $650 billion." Does anyone buy this BS? This from the gang that created "or saved" 60000 jobs in districts that don't exist. KILL THE BILL!!!BY danceswithtrees on 11/19/2009 at 00:16
This bill would be a cataclysmic disaster IF it passes. Don't forget that these immoral Democratic fools want to gut seniors care by $500 billion to fund their big govt scheme and soon it will be mandated (not just "recommended") that women under 50 do not get mammograms — while Pelosi and Reid give more of our tax dollars to illegal aliens.BY NO OBAMACARE on 11/19/2009 at 00:18
In Yellowstone park there are signs all over the park which warn you not to feed the bears. After all the Government handouts which have taken place recently they ought to change those signs to say "Don't Feed the Liberals!" Liberals are much like bears in that they are never satisfied with just one handout they always want more and the sad part of this is, that the more they get, the more they demand and the angrier they get if they donBY Cowboys61 on 11/19/2009 at 00:30
Newsflash from the North PoleIn keeping with the spirit and theme of this years bailouts ,handouts and amnesty, Santa Claus has decided to give a toy bailout to naughty children too. However due to a lack of planning and resources available, Santa will have to cut back on how many toys each good child receives. For this reason, toys will have to be rationed in order to make sure that every child gets a toy this year.. (Hmm. Where I have I heard this before?) So please, tell your children to shorten their letters to Santa this year because Billy the Bully , Tommy the Tease and Patty the Pouter will be getting some of their toys. Some children will have to wait until next year for toys on their list due to this rationing However remind those good little children that the Christmas Spirit is about the joy of giving. We wish you a Merry Christmas! Ho! Ho! Ho!Sincerely , SantaBY Cowboys61 on 11/19/2009 at 00:32
Um… "No Obamacare"—- not a single one of the 3 points you bring up bears with it the slightest semblance of truth. There are legitimate arguments to be made for and against the bill. Outright lying only denegrates the entire playing-field.BY HOnest Abe on 11/19/2009 at 00:53

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.