THE HILL
 

Senate duo forms pact on climate

By Alexander Bolton - 11/20/09 06:00 AM ET

Senate Democratic leaders are resting their hopes for bipartisan climate change legislation on the unlikely partnership of Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).

The revelation this fall that the two lawmakers shared a strong bond and a commitment to work together on one of the biggest policy issues facing Congress shocked many of their Senate colleagues.

They do not serve on any of the same committees, which is where many Senate friendships begin.

They are ideological opposites who took very public, antagonist roles in the past two presidential contests.

Kerry, a Massachusetts liberal, challenged President George W. Bush with an anti-war campaign in 2004 and strongly backed President Barack Obama during the 2008 campaign.

Graham, a South Carolina Republican who served as a prosecutor in former President Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial, was an enthusiastic Bush supporter in 2004 and served as Sen. John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) close confidant during last year’s presidential election.

Kerry is tall and somber-looking with a deep voice. Graham is shorter, softer-spoken and possesses a Southern drawl.

But none of that stopped the two men from teaming up last month on an op-ed that announced their plans to work together on a comprehensive climate change bill and a declaration that their partnership could net 60 votes in the Senate.

“If you asked me if I saw it coming, I would have said no,” said Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), who will play a central role in the climate change debate.

As it turns out, Kerry and Graham share a number of things in common that set the partnership in motion.

They both are fans of the “Pink Panther” films, featuring the late Peter Sellers as the bumbling French Inspector Clouseau.

They both are former prosecutors and military men — Kerry served on a Navy swift boat in Vietnam, while Graham is still a colonel, serving as a judge advocate general instructor, in the Air Force Reserves.

They like to work out in the Senate gym in the Russell building.

And like many lasting friendships, theirs began over a meal.

Kerry invited Graham and a few other senators over to his hme for dinner. Kerry remembered the event happening “three or four years” ago. He said it was a dinner for the prime minister of Pakistan and that Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and former Sen. John Warner (R-Va.) also attended.

He vividly remembers Graham getting a kick out of playing with his wife’s dog, a German schnauzer named Clouseau.

“We joked about that, because we share an affinity for Clouseau movies,” Kerry said.

“He’s good company, a good guy,” said Kerry. “The time I most got to know him was at the dinner. We broke bread and had a chance to talk and Teresa enjoyed his company a lot and he enjoyed talking to her. We then had a very enjoyable series of conversations.”

After that dinner, Kerry and Graham began to work together more often on legislative issues. They collaborated on 2006 legislation setting up military tribunals to try suspected terrorists and applying the law to outside contractors in Iraq. They also worked together on immigration reform.

But their teamwork failed to garner much notice outside the Senate. One political adviser close to Kerry said the relationship between the Massachusetts lawmaker and Graham was “nonexistent.”

A longtime former aide to Graham said he could not remember his former boss doing much work with Kerry.

But a match on climate change legislation made sense for many reasons. Kerry considers climate change one of his most important legislative objectives. Kerry and his wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry, co-authored a book about the modern environmentalist movement, 2007’s This Moment on Earth.

Colleagues say that Kerry was also looking for a big legislative achievement. After 24 years in the Senate, he did not have a signature law with his name on it, something that produced some awkwardness on the campaign trail in 2004 when aides tried to frame the reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as a notable achievement.

Graham was looking for a way to boost the role of the nuclear industry, which has two major plants in South Carolina, in the national energy economy.

Graham has made expanded reliance on nuclear energy one of his chief demands in the climate change debate, something that would be a boon to the major employers back home, such as the Oconee Nuclear Station, located five miles from where Graham grew up. The Savannah River Site, which is an important national center for recycling nuclear waste, located near the Georgia border, would also benefit.

Kerry and Graham talked informally several times, on the Senate floor and even at the Senate gym, about a potential partnership.

“We finally met in my office and came to agreement and moved very rapidly,” Kerry said.

Kerry identified Graham as a potential ally during the last Senate debate over climate change, when the chamber considered legislation sponsored by Sen. Joe Lieberman (Conn.), who was a Democrat at the time, and John Warner, a centrist Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee.

Graham voted against the Lieberman-Warner bill but said during floor debate that Congress needed to solve the problem of global climate change.

Graham recalled how Kerry approached him after the vote.

“He listened to the debate and said, ‘I appreciate your interest’ and he said, ‘We need to recast this debate and I’m going to be involved and I need somebody that will work with me to get the debate restarted,’ ” Graham recalled.

Graham acknowledged that he and Kerry have often butted heads in public.

“I spent most of my time on TV against John Kerry, arguing in the presidential campaign. We did everything but the Food Channel,” Graham said. “I respect John. He’s a liberal Democrat and I’m a conservative Republican, but we try to find common ground.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is resting his hopes on Kerry and Graham, who have also teamed up with Lieberman, for getting climate change legislation through the Senate. It looks as though Democrats may pass healthcare reform without any Republican votes, but that does not appear to be possible with climate change legislation because of the strong reservations of Democrats from coal- and oil-and-gas-rich states over a cap-and-trade policy.

Reid told a group of lobbyists at a breakfast meeting last week that the success of climate change legislation lay with Kerry and Graham.

“Reid said the bill is in the hands of Kerry and Graham,” said a person who attended the meeting.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/68791-senate-duo-forms-pact-on-climate-

Comments (21)

There's an obvious error in the lede to this story. It should read: Sen. Lindsey Graham (RINO-S.C.)BY Arick on 11/20/2009 at 06:49
It's nice to see the Senate getting back to America's work. President George Washington said in his farewell address that political parties would hurt America in the long run because they would use what makes America stronger and our democracy work our differences. It's time to stop playing this silly shirts vs skins nonsense that keeps us from making progress and let's us countries surpass us. It's easy to call someone a rhino when you don't have to navigate legislation thru congress. America is much bigger that two parties. Kudos to Sens. Graham and Kerry for working together as opposed to playing the i'm on this side you're on that side game. They both work for America!!! One way, one thought…sounds more like Communist China.BY kimlonzo on 11/20/2009 at 07:35
Problem herre is that there is no global warming and no threat. The past 11 years we have not seen a rise in global temps. The whole darn thing is a farce. Every 20 years, the cycle changes and we have a warming cycle and the a cooling cycle.Now that Graham is stupid enough to support this crap, I will not support him in the least bit.BY camelriders on 11/20/2009 at 09:17
Forget climate change. the Republicans should be leading ENERGY INDEPENDENCE FOR AMERICA. THIS is what we need and want. We need an ALL OF THE ABOVE push for Oil,Nuclear,Nat ural gas,Clean coal, Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Wave power, etc. This push would create jobs too. It's time to get serious about our energy future and can the Al Gore malarkey.BY danceswithtrees on 11/20/2009 at 10:19
Sen Lindsey Grahm has a point. If no bill is passed the EPA will act like Obama's CZARS, accountable to no one and run amok creating their own heavy handed rules.BUT, the same mentality of the "the earth is flat" until proven otherwise occupies the gulible majority who refuse to admit global warming is fiction. Sure there are some who know it is fiction, but salivate over the prospect of new taxation. Congress is acting like a bunch of 12 year old girls, adoring Pop Icon Al Gore and hanging on his every word and ignoring over 2,000 actual scientist.BY MON on 11/20/2009 at 10:25
This is why conservatives (and others with common sense) do not trust RINO Graham who supports the fraud known as "climate change" "global warming" or whatever the blowhards want to call it.BY from Ohio on 11/20/2009 at 11:12
Fact check: Joe Lieberman was an Independent last Senate during debate over Lieberman-Warner.This article reads like the author doesn't care for politics, only his paycheck. Hire a new writer.BY That Guy on 11/20/2009 at 12:30
The commenters here (with one notable exception) reveal how successful the disinformation campaign funded by coal and oil interests has been. I am all for increasing domestic oil production, but anyone who's familiar with expert consensus on oil knows that we need to develop a strategy to move on. US oil production peaked in 1970 as predicted by M. King Hubbert in 1956. The North Sea peaked in 1999. In fact, 33 of the 48 largest oil producers have peaked. We also need more courageous thought leaders like Senator Graham in Congress. It saddens me that the Republican party (my party) seems incapable now of leading when 40 years of peer-reviewed science on global warming demands that we lead. Those that call this unprecedented scientific consensus 'fraud' are truly pathetic and an embarrassment to a once-proud political party. A political party at war with science will go the same way as the Whigs.BY 1776Independent on 11/20/2009 at 13:26
Well - with Specter, McCain and now, Graham - they only need one more for bridge in their Retirement Homes.BY cme on 11/20/2009 at 14:26
I don't believe in man-made climate change and roughly half of Americans agree with me. The Left has fabricated this junk science to fleece and control us. I don't agree with Graham. We should not give any legitimacy to the fake science.BY Lola on 11/20/2009 at 14:27

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.