THE HILL
 

Union pulls back on supporting bill

By Jeffrey Young - 12/16/09 12:37 PM ET

The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) backed out of an event with other organizations promoting the Senate healthcare reform bill Wednesday over concerns about changes made to the legislation to accommodate centrist Democrats.

The SEIU had planned to participate in a Capitol Hill press conference along with the AARP, the liberal advocacy group Families USA, Consumers Union and the American Cancer Society Action Network. As recently as Tuesday morning, the organizations distributed an advisory to the news media that included the SEIU.

But the move by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to excise provisions of the healthcare reform bill to create a government-run public option health insurance program and to allow people between 55 and 64 years old to buy into Medicare gave the labor union pause, spokeswoman Lori Lodes said.

"That decision has to be made by our leaders and our members," Lodes said. The event with the AARP and the other groups was scheduled before Reid made changes to the bill.

The SEIU executive board will hold what Lodes described as an "emergency" meeting Wednesday night to decide how to move forward. "Right now, they don't have the information they need to make this decision," said Lodes, who added that the SEIU informed the other organizations on Tuesday they would not be joining the press conference.

The board meeting likely will not produce a final determination by the union about whether to support advancing the Senate healthcare bill, which not only lacks a public option and the Medicare buy-in but also would levy an excise tax on so-called Cadillac health insurance plans that some union members have, Lodes said.

"We will not have an absolute decision coming," largely because Reid has not released the final language of the healthcare bill, she said.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/72537-union-pulls-back-on-supporting-senate-bill

Comments (308)

The bill is absolete.- lets move on.BY Mark on 12/16/2009 at 13:14
ALL liberals, both in and out of Congress, will end up supporting the Obamacare Bill. While it doesn't do everything the liberals would like, it is, by far, the greatest expansion of government control over each individual's health.In baseball terms, it is not a grand slam home run, just a just a regular home run.If the bill is defeated, it will be because the (so-called) pro-life Democrats resist the intense pressure from within their own party to support Obamacare.BY Art Kelly on 12/16/2009 at 13:15
I made the comment quite sometime ago about on the farm, pigs will eat their own. It is time to remind you. Lets get rid of the donkey as reid, schummmmmer, obama, murray, deadfish and the rest of the democrats life wingers and now officially have a picture of ol porky pig. ol porky pig is running around right now viscously calling airline attendents b*****s and eating their own and America will be a better place because ot it. I can't wait until 2010 when we can throw the pigs out into the slopp after a rainstorm. Here piggy , here, piggy.BY Jake2 on 12/16/2009 at 13:15
good …BY tom on 12/16/2009 at 13:16
There are way too many hands in the cookie jar. When the cookies are all gone, what then? No more America as we know. Get this dastardly matter over with and forget it.Has there ever been such a confused and drawn out mess such as this?BY doreme on 12/16/2009 at 13:19
The SEIU the AARP, the liberal advocacy group Families USA, Consumers Union and the American Cancer Society Action Network!?! Why do we let theses things make our laws?You’ve heard it said, "Outlawing political contributions from lobbyists denies free speech." However, in truth, "allowing it denies free speech." The constitution guarantees free speech to individual persons only, not to groups. Even a petition requires signatures of individuals who agree with it. A charter and a membership list is not a constitutionall y authorized substitute for a petition. Groups, organizations, associations, industries, corporations, etc. are not individual living persons. A non-human, legal entity can’t really claim that its free speech is being denied. Each member of a group already merits free speech as an individual. The groups themselves warrant no free speech, they are merely a concept or an idea; it’s not even possible for these “things” to speak! Free speakers are invented out of nothing and granted the ability to make huge political donations. Obviously, this farce greatly dilutes the true free speech that is uttered by actual humans. Our (the only real) free speech is practically worthless by comparison. We mere mortals can't compete against powerful artificial beings, (invisible, intangible, immortal entities, that have been unconstitutiona ll y granted more powerful speech than any human, but actually exist only in contemplation of the law) for the favors of our own elected representatives .These “things” are trying to pass laws that induce you to serve them. (Sorry to bring up idolatry, but this practice clearly violates the first commandment as well as the first amendment.) Our legislators are supposed to represent "we the people" not some subset of the people who seek to make laws against the rest of us and are allowed (by those being thus bribed) to pay bigger bribes than we can. It’s time our representatives in Congress, (they swear by the constitution,) upheld an individuals constitutional right to free speech! Anyone who continues to accept the bigger bribes (donations) that lobby groups can offer should be un-elected forthwith.BY Salverda on 12/16/2009 at 13:23
Isn't it grand that we have an administration working under 'the lights' with full transparency.BY Captn Tony on 12/16/2009 at 13:25
SEIU,We need your help. Without the public option, the "mandate" turns into "either buy Aetna or Anthem" or (any private insurance company) or pay a federal fine for not contracting with a private corporation.That is a scary precedent.BY Les Holcomb on 12/16/2009 at 13:29
In the final analysis, Democrats want a bill so they can say they tried Republicans blocked their efforts. Ironically, if it fails or passes as a meager bill, it will be because Democrats tore it part, not Republicans.The effort has to do w/ control, NOT health care. The effort also has to do w/ collection of more taxes. All of the politicians suffer from an addiction known as, 'spending.' Its pathetic, in the extreme.The bureaucracy they want to create is their intention that is why SEIU is unhappy. They wanted thousands more new federal UNIONIZED employees. They wanted all that union dues, plus control over politicians who fear a union attacking them on issues. If the unions get their way, it will be they who decide America's future, since they will control the politicians their agenda will be the only actions coming out of Washington.Worse is that the bill does nothing at all to reform health care delivery. The cuts to Medicare will be serious are an indicator someone wants old people to die off so they are no longer a financial burden. All but themselves those who support them that is.If we are lucky, the whole thing will flop!BY Rubicon on 12/16/2009 at 13:43
When there was concern over the mafia and unions getting too close to the President in the 60's, the White House distanced itself from them.The SEIU is NO different. I can't say there is any organized crime involved, and have seen no evidence, but racketeering and influence peddling? Yup, the White House is bought and paid for. He should be ashamed.BY MD Liberal on 12/16/2009 at 13:56

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.