Kerry’s climate strategy: Get mad

Sen. John KerryJohn KerryTrump's VP: Top 10 contenders Peace equality and stability for religious minorities Kerry hopes to salvage frayed Syrian peace MORE (D-Mass.) is urging climate change activists to match the intensity of their conservative opponents as he struggles to keep the issue on the election-year agenda.

“I want you to go out there and start knocking on doors and talking to people and telling people, ‘This has to happen!’ ” Kerry said at a forum hosted by environmentalists, veterans and others Wednesday.

ADVERTISEMENT
“You know, if tea-party folks go out there and get angry because they think their taxes are too high, for God’s sakes, a lot of citizens ought to be angry about the fact that they’re being killed and our planet is being injured by what is happening on a daily basis by the way we provide our power and our fuel and by the old practices we have,” Kerry said.

He added: “That’s something worth getting angry about. And I think it’s time for people to do that.”

Kerry, who chairs the Foreign Relations Committee, has claimed ownership of climate legislation for the Democrats. He has stepped outside the committee process to negotiate a compromise package of emissions caps and energy measures with Sens. Lindsey GrahamLindsey GrahamNever Trump voices face tough decision Trump: GOP critics can come back after my 'two terms' Graham: GOP has 'lost its way' on Trump MORE (R-S.C.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.).

His speech Wednesday is part of a flurry of activity as Kerry tries to keep climate change legislation — once a top priority for Capitol Hill Democrats — afloat in 2010.

The trio of senators has held a slew of meetings, including sessions with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel last week. The three legislators also engaged in talks Tuesday with Sens. Maria CantwellMaria CantwellThis week: Congress on track to miss Puerto Rico deadline Week ahead: Senate looks to wrap up energy, water spending bill Senate, House face time crunch on energy bill MORE (D-Wash.) and Susan CollinsSusan CollinsThe Trail 2016: And then there was one Maine Republican senator suggests she could back Trump Larry Wilmore, Sting party in DC ahead of WHCD MORE (R-Maine), who are sponsoring a competing plan.

But while emissions caps have been embraced by the White House and Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill, prospects for climate legislation remain highly uncertain. Democrats are still reeling from Republican Scott Brown’s stunning win in Kerry’s home state, and they’re focusing heavily on the economy and jobs.

Kerry and other backers say the climate bill would help on both fronts (and that doing nothing ultimately costs more), but Republican and industry opponents of cap-and-trade say it’s a job-killer.

Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidDemocrats race to link GOP incumbents to Trump Mellman: Give positive a chance Koch network super-PAC launches ad buys in Wisconsin, Nevada MORE (D-Nev.), who is facing a challenging reelection race, has sent mixed signals on climate change. At one point, he called moving the bill “a headache.” But Reid said in mid-January that he plans to bring a “comprehensive” climate and energy bill to the floor this spring.

Beth Viola, who advised Kerry in his 2004 presidential run, said, “I think [Kerry] is fiery because he feels really passionately about the fact that we have a real global crisis — the economic impacts as well as the environmental impacts are potentially quite significant.

“I suspect he is probably pretty anxious to see people make the case for the legislation as loudly as those who are making the case against it,” added Viola, who worked on environmental issues in the Clinton White House and is now a senior adviser with Holland & Knight.

Kerry has an aggressive agenda for his committee this year. But the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee, who was criticized by the GOP that year for his lack of big-ticket legislative accomplishments, has zeroed in on climate change.

The 66-year-old senator sharpened his tone in several ways during his speech on Wednesday. While he laid out familiar arguments that climate and energy legislation will help expand U.S. alternative-energy sectors and boost private investment, he also injected a hint of populism.

ADVERTISEMENT
“Does it require a company to lay out some money for new technology? You’re damn right it does, but isn’t that what we should be doing to reduce pollution and clean up the air?” he said.

But Kerry’s task is complex because he has concluded that winning emissions limits will require several concessions to industry and Republicans. The plan he is crafting with Graham and Lieberman will likely contain an expansion of offshore drilling and large new subsidies for building nuclear power plants.

Indeed, Graham on Wednesday emphasized the need for a business-friendly approach.

The South Carolina Republican called the sweeping cap-and-trade bill the House approved — and a similar plan that Kerry himself co-sponsored with Environment and Public Works Committee Chairwoman Barbara BoxerBarbara BoxerCruz fouls out in Indiana Carter pledges probe of sex assault testimony Senate panel backs B water bill with Flint aid MORE (D-Calif.) — dead on arrival.

“The climate change legislation passed by the House of Representatives and Senate Environment and Public Works Committee is too onerous on business and does not enjoy bipartisan support,” Graham said.

“My goal is to continue working with Sens. Kerry, Lieberman and my Senate colleagues to create a new pathway forward that focuses on a more robust energy security package and a more business-friendly climate legislation,” he continued.

Many large environmental groups have signaled that they’re open to compromises to win long-sought limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

But compounding Kerry's challenge is that a number of centrist Senate Democrats – including Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) and Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) – want the chamber to take up a package of energy measures that omits emissions caps. They’re eyeing a bill the Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved in June.

That broad bill includes new renewable energy requirements, expanded federal financing for low-carbon energy technologies, wider Gulf of Mexico oil-and-gas drilling and several energy efficiency programs.

Sen. Mark PryorMark PryorEx-Sen. Kay Hagan joins lobby firm Top Democrats are no advocates for DC statehood Ex-Sen. Landrieu joins law and lobby firm MORE (D-Ark.) signaled his support for the “energy-only” approach Wednesday. “I would probably prefer just an energy bill, but what I have told everybody is I will be patient and listen and see what they come up with. If it does have climate change in it, I will wait and see what’s in there,” he said.