THE HILL
 

Dodd sets up new scrutiny over Wall St.

By Silla Brush - 03/15/10 08:35 PM ET

Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) on Monday unveiled wide-ranging financial legislation in his latest move to complete an overhaul in 2010.

“We will have financial reform adopted this year,” Dodd vowed in a press conference unveiling the 1,300-page bill. While he was optimistic he could win over Republicans, Dodd allowed that the healthcare debate and Democrats’ use of special budget rules could poison the potential for compromise.

“There’s always that possibility,” Dodd said.

The Senate Banking Committee is set for a markup during the week of March 22, and Senate Democrats are aiming to pass the financial bill before the Memorial Day break.

The chairman of the Banking panel faces a difficult road ahead, without any Republican support and an army of interest groups bearing down on restrictions against big banks and other financial companies.

“Forcing the Banking Committee to vote on this proposal in a single week is unrealistic and undercuts the potential for bipartisan agreement,” said Sen. Richard Shelby (Ala.), the senior Republican on Dodd’s committee. “Strong reform should not fear scrutiny.”


The short legislative calendar, a midterm election season in which Republicans stand to make significant gains and a political atmosphere dominated by the divisive healthcare debate further complicate Dodd’s task.


 Other Republicans repeated their call for more time to consider the financial legislation.

Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) said he hoped Democrats would not impose a “hyperpartisan process of false deadlines,” while Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who spent weeks negotiating with Dodd, said there were parts of the bill he could not support and would look to alter with amendments.

Dodd responded by stating that many provisions in his bill grew out of bipartisan discussions.

Financial lobbyists at the Financial Services Roundtable, National Association of Federal Credit Unions (NAFCU), Credit Union National Association, Consumer Bankers Association and elsewhere were already massing their arguments against the bill.

The American Bankers Association (ABA), which is holding a conference this week with 900 bankers in Washington, quickly swung back against the Dodd bill.

 “We oppose this bill because it will subject traditional banks, which did not cause this crisis, to heavy new regulation, while non-banks will have even further competitive advantage,” said Ed Yingling, ABA’s president.

 President Barack Obama praised the legislation and vowed to fight lobbying efforts to weaken the bill and a new consumer protection office at the Federal Reserve.

 “I will not accept attempts to undermine the independence of the consumer protection agency, or to exclude from its purview banks, credit card companies or non-bank firms such as debt collectors, credit bureaus, payday lenders or auto dealers,” Obama said.

The bill replaces a proposal originally backed by the Obama administration for a standalone Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA) with a consumer office at the Federal Reserve. The proposal was backed by Corker during private negotiations, but the scope of its enforcement powers are greater in Dodd’s bill than previously envisioned.

 The office would have broad discretion to write rules on the financial industry as well as to enforce those rules for banks and non-banks with at least $10 billion in assets. Credit union groups are pushing an amendment to lift that threshold to $50 billion. The rules could be overridden by a two-thirds vote of a new council to oversee risks to the financial system.

 While consumer advocates and liberal Democrats have criticized the move to locate the office at the central bank, they were more muted in their concerns on Monday.

Ed Mierzwinski, of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, praised Dodd for creating a consumer bureau that is housed at the Fed, but with a “firewall” against potential efforts to weaken it.

“It appears not to be under the Federal Reserve,” Mierzwinski said.

 The legislation gives power to the Federal Reserve to oversee bank holding companies with at least $50 billion in assets, while also creating a system aimed at preventing future taxpayer-funded bailouts of the financial industry.

The legislation contemplates a high bar for government regulators to put a failing firm through a resolution process, and also sets up a $50 billion industry-supported fund for wind-downs that would be run by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

Dodd also included a tougher version of a restriction on proprietary trading than was discussed a few weeks ago. Dodd would require federal regulators to devise a way to prohibit proprietary trading at banks.

The provision follows the “Volcker rule,” outlined earlier this year by Paul Volcker, an administration adviser and former Federal Reserve chairman.

The bill would also clamp down on the multitrillion-dollar market for financial derivatives that many argue exacerbated the financial crisis in 2008.

 Sens. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Gregg have been negotiating the details of the derivatives legislation, and Dodd said he hoped it would soon become part of the broader overhaul measure.

 A Reed spokesman said the goal was to complete the derivatives legislation this week.

Five keys to Dodd financial overhaul
 
Consumer Protection:
Creates a consumer protection office at the Federal Reserve that would have broad rule-writing and enforcement powers over banks and non-banks with at least $10 billion in assets. Rules could be overridden by a two-thirds vote of a council set up to oversee risks to the financial system.
 
Federal Reserve supervision:
The Fed would supervise firms with at least $50 billion in assets. Monetary policy functions would not face a new government audit. The president would be in charge of appointing the head of the New York Fed, rather than the bank’s directors, six of whom are elected now by big private banks.
 
Ending ‘too big to fail’
Dodd would set a high bar for the government and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to act to wind down a failing financial firm. The bill would create a $50 billion industry-supported fund that could be tapped by the FDIC to wind down a company.
 
Volcker Rule
The measure requires regulators to devise a prohibition on proprietary trading at banks. The proposal was originally outlined by Paul Volcker, the former Fed chairman and adviser to President Barack Obama.
 
Corporate governance
The legislation gives shareholders a “say on pay” and a right to a non-binding vote on executive pay. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) would have power to give shareholders “proxy access” to nominate directors.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/86935-dodd-sets-up-new-scrutiny-over-wall-st

Comments (8)

I thought the ABA president was Jesse James.BY Michael R on 03/15/2010 at 22:07
Cut back on government workers , And Waste , SALE Nancy's new jet, That she bought with your tax moneys , Just because it did'nt carry enough people, And it had to stop to Refuel,It was good enough for all the others before her, And the 1st lady's trip to europe and other waste , Make Obama pay all that back, The moneys there they just choose to spend it on other things, I think it's sad and just plain out low down,That ALL government workers think more of themself's than people that voted them in Office,Hey If you get a job as a mill worker , they don't furnish your car , Why buy government workers cars,They make more than mill workers do,Theres you some moneys, For S.S , And other thing,If you owe the I.R.S, $100.00 They can spend $50,000,00 or more to get it,Cut back on I.R.S. workersBoy thats smart, It just goes on and on , The money is there , They just blow it on other things,Than the people that voted them into office, And both Party's are just as bad,I don't know much about this tea party ,But from what i'm reading on them , Sounds like they need a leader to run for office ,AND ALSO This whole Health Care thing is Nothing more than both party's on EGO TripsBut this is just what i think about the whole thing,The government cut backs Start with the poor people ,It just seems to me ,That if they started at the Top , It would help faster without hurting as many people, And It would be the right thing to do , Because , I Know it's hard to Vision this but the GOVERNMENT WORKS FOR US , WE ARE THE BOSS ,But until we speak up , And do something about it, They will keep running over us all,But as i said thats just what i think about it ,By the way my dad was in the u.s. Army 33yrs.;-)BY r on 03/15/2010 at 22:59
Congratulations to the members and staff of the Banking Committee for getting the draft this far. Before finishing the Committee's work it is very important that they have at least one hearing on the Lehman Examiners report. Understanding the actions of regulators and other banks in the largest corporate bankruptcy ever is critical to knowing that the new laws address the real problems with Wall Street: http://freerisk.org/wiki/index.php/LehmanBY Cate Long on 03/16/2010 at 00:54
The man who lied through his teeth about bonuses for Wall St in the stimulus package, the man who has yet to release his financial records, the one to fix Wall St? Dodd is a criminal and should be in jail, not in retirement.BY drjohn on 03/16/2010 at 07:11
The dismantling of America loco-motive is on a steep downhill grade. A runaway train! Can someone please pull the emergency break and stop this thing! Health scare, shamnesty, now bank take over. What is next?BY DJ on 03/16/2010 at 09:10
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies" Thomas JeffersonBY Michael R on 03/16/2010 at 11:38
Dodd? The guy who wrecked the mortgage industry? The guy who should be under criminal investgation. Are you kidding me? What a farce. This is all about Government take over of the private sector. We expect the governement to protect us? NO THANKS!BY ovrtax on 03/16/2010 at 13:23
The draft legislation makes the mistake of lumping community banks and others that didn't cause the economic mess into the same category as those entities that did cause the problems. That's nonsense. The result will be increased costs for consumers of financial services of all types.BY Roger BEVERAGE on 03/16/2010 at 13:27

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.