Sunday Talk Shows

Rep. Paul RyanPaul RyanOvernight Finance: Senate sends Puerto Rico bill to Obama | Treasury, lawmakers to meet on tax rules | Obama hits Trump on NAFTA | Fed approves most banks' capital plans The Trail 2016: When a pivot isn’t always a pivot Kasich touts poll showing he does better against Clinton than Trump MORE’s budget plan would cut $4T from deficit

• House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said on “Fox News Sunday” that his 2012 budget plan cuts more than $4 trillion from the deficit, a number that exceeds the goals set by President Obama’s deficit commission, of which Ryan was a member.

Ryan’s plan, to be released Tuesday, will go beyond discretionary spending caps; he said he is still working with the official number but he would impose statutory spending caps — setting spending levels based on the country’s gross domestic product. The plan also addresses entitlements and has some “pro-growth” tax reforms.

“We don’t have a tax problem,” Ryan said. “We aren’t in this situation because Americans aren’t taxed enough, the problem is Washington spending.”

Ryan criticized Obama’s leadership role, or lack thereof, on the budget debate. “He is punting on the debt crisis,” Ryan said.

Sen. John CornynJohn CornynOvernight Finance: Trump threatens NAFTA withdrawal | Senate poised for crucial Puerto Rico vote | Ryan calls for UK trade deal | Senate Dems block Zika funding deal Senate faces critical vote on Puerto Rico McConnell tees up House Puerto Rico bill MORE (R-Texas) also said the president should be more involved in the discussions. “We need presidential leadership on [the budget and deficit] and he’s MIA on this,” said Cornyn on “State of the Union.”

“This week he’s announcing his reelection, it’s like, where are your priorities,” he said.

But Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidDems leery of Planned Parenthood cuts spark Senate scuffle Overnight Finance: Senate sends Puerto Rico bill to Obama | Treasury, lawmakers to meet on tax rules | Obama hits Trump on NAFTA | Fed approves most banks' capital plans Senate passes Puerto Rico debt relief bill MORE (D-Nev.), and Assistant Majority Leader Dick DurbinDick DurbinClinton ally stands between Sanders and chairmanship dream Reid backs House Puerto Rico bill McConnell pledges redo vote on Zika after break MORE (D-Ill.) said Obama had been active behind the scene. Reid said on “Face the Nation” he consulted with Obama daily about the budget negotiations.

Durbin said on “Meet the Press” that House Republicans have lost credibility with the American people by bringing the riders — defunding Planned Parenthood and limiting the Environmental Protection Agency — into the debate.

Sen. Mark WarnerMark WarnerOvernight Cybersecurity: Calls grow for encryption panel Homeland Security Committee pushes encryption commission in new report The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE (D-Va.), agreed, saying during a “State of the Union” appearance that, “What message does that send if we shut down the government based on a few social policy riders?”

Reid said he thinks the two parties will work things out to avoid a government shutdown. “I always look at the glass as half-full,” he said.

Cornyn called a continuing resolution to finish fiscal 2011 “small ball” compared to the vote later this year to raise the debt limit, which he and Sen. Marco RubioMarco RubioRubio: Turkey attack 'directed' by ISIS Trump: Rivals who don't back me shouldn't be allowed to run for office GOP mega-donor: Trump would cause 'global depression' MORE (R-Fla.) said they would oppose unless concessions are made.

“I don’t ever want to vote to default this country,” Rubio said on “Fox News Sunday.” “But anyone who votes to increase the debt limit does just that eventually.”

Jones: Iran seeking advantage in Arab uprisings

• Former National Security Adviser Gen. Jim Jones cautioned against the ongoing threat from Iran, calling it “the big shadow on the whole region” that benefits from the chaos of popular uprising. 

“There are a lot of things going on that, if you’re the Iranian government, you’re probably pretty happy with,” Jones said during an appearance on “State of the Union.”

“Despite the banner of democracy and change, Iran is going to be out there agitating things … You can bet that Iran is affecting virtually everything and trying to play in every country,” he said. 

Jones referenced the January nuclear talks held in Istanbul in which Iran refused to bargain with the assembled Western countries until they agreed to halt economic sanctions, among other conditions. 

“We do have to pay attention to their nuclear program,” he said. “All this trouble in the region masks what’s going on [with it].”

Asked about the U.S. intervention in Libya, Jones told “This Week” that stability there is more in the “vital interest” of Europeans, who are concerned about the hazards of immigration, terror and fluctuations in the oil market. 

“It’s not in the vital interest [of the United States] in the sense that it affects the vital security of the nation. But we are part of an alliance,” he said. 

Also on Sunday, lawmakers weighed the pros and cons of arming the Libyan uprising, which some believe could have dangerous elements. 

Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey GrahamOvernight Defense: US blames ISIS for Turkey attack | Afghan visas in spending bill | Army rolls up its sleeves Senate panel passes bill that would create 4K visas for Afghans Trump: Rivals who don't back me shouldn't be allowed to run for office MORE (R-S.C.) argued for it.  “We need to help the rebels help themselves, and provide arms when it makes sense,” he said during his “Face the Nation” appearance. “Help the rebels, take the fight to Tripoli, and get this thing over with.”

Meanwhile Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) hesitated on “Face the Nation” and “Meet the Press.”

“We just need to know a lot more before we give them advanced weaponry,” Rogers said. 

He also noted that Libyan President Moammar Gadhafi has chemical weapons — a threat he said “keeps him up at night.”

Petraeus, senators condemn Quran burning

• Gen. David Petraeus, U.S. commander in Afghanistan, sent a letter Sunday condemning the actions of a Florida church that burned The Quran. The actions of the church, lead by Terry Jones, sparked deadly riots in Afghanistan, posing a major setback for the war effort.

“Terry Jones jeopardized the lives of American soldiers,” Sen. Dick Durban (D-Ill.) said on “Meet the Press.” “We should all condemn the actions of this man.”

On “Face the Nation,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said he would look into the possibility of a Senate vote to condemn the burning, and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) agreed.

“Free speech is a great idea, but we’re in a war,” Graham said. “In World War II, there were limits on what you could say if it could incite the enemy … I think Congress would be right to support what Gen. Petraeus said.”

Sen. Graham rejects State Dept. ‘army

• Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) expressed concerns that the State Department would form its “own army” once American military forces leave Iraq at year’s end. 

He said the State Department has asked for a fleet of helicopters, armored vehicles, and “thousands of private security guards” to defend the American civilians that remain to work on civil-society projects. 

“We are inside the 10-yard line in terms of finishing the job [in Iraq],” he said. “But the State Department can’t conduct their mission … unless the American military is there.”

“We’ll have a State Department Army. I will not vote for that. I will not support that … That will fail,” he said. 

Graham said he would favor leaving “some troops behind” in order to protect American civilians. He also said it would help to “have an edge against Iran.” 

Several publications reported in summer 2010 that the State Department had requested Black Hawk helicopters, surveillance systems, fuel trucks and other military gear from the Pentagon in anticipation of the exit of U.S. forces from Iraq. 

A report at the time by the legislative Commission on Wartime Contracting said that the number of contractors in Iraq would grow by more than 50 percent if the request was carried out. 

Planning for the transition began in Washington and Baghdad in spring 2009, according to McClatchy.