Trump administration: Three-quarters of international terrorism convicts foreign born

Trump administration: Three-quarters of international terrorism convicts foreign born
© Getty Images

Three out of four individuals convicted on international terrorism charges in the U.S. were foreign born, according to a new report released by the Trump administration amid a contentious debate on national security and immigration.

Between Sept. 11, 2001, and Dec. 31, 2016, 549 individuals were convicted on international terrorism charges, of whom 254 were foreign citizens, 148 were naturalized U.S. citizens and 147 were natural born U.S. citizens, according to Justice Department  numbers.

"This report is part of the administration's efforts to illuminate basic statistics that should be at the hands of the American people to inform public discourse on the issue," a senior administration official told reporters during a briefing on Tuesday.

The report highlights seven "illustrative examples" of foreign-born individuals convicted of terrorism. Those individuals were born in India, Pakistan, Sudan, Syria, Uzbekistan and Yemen; some obtained U.S. citizenship, others legal permanent residency or refugee status.

Administration officials said the examples serve "to highlight the importance of reforming our immigration system to ensure that we are identifying and admitting individuals who are the most likely to assimilate, thrive and succeed in the United States."

The report also says 2,554 people on the terrorist watchlist were intercepted attempting to enter the United States, 2,170 by air, 335 by land and 49 by sea.

The report does not include numbers on how many of the convicts or interceptees were either in the U.S. or attempting to enter the country through the diversity visa or family reunification — commonly called "chain migration" — programs.

"We don't as of today have all of those details ready to release. We hope to be able to provide statistical information about the manner of entry of all of these individuals in a future iteration of this report," said another senior administration official. "I can assure you that it is more than just the cherry-picked cases that are represented here in this report who entered through this program."

President TrumpDonald John TrumpFamily immigration detention centers could be at capacity within days: report Trump likely to meet with Putin in July: report DOJ requests military lawyers to help prosecute immigration crimes: report MORE demanded in a meeting with lawmakers last week that any agreement to replace the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program — which Trump rescinded last September — include provisions to end the diversity visa program and reform family-based immigration.

Trump included Sen. Tom CottonThomas (Tom) Bryant CottonSenate moving ahead with border bill, despite Trump Hillicon Valley: New FTC chief eyes shake up of tech regulation | Lawmakers target Google, Huawei partnership | Microsoft employees voice anger over ICE contract Lawmakers urge Google to drop partnership with Chinese phone maker Huawei MORE (R-Ark.), a proponent of doing away with the diversity lottery program and chain migration, and Rep. Bob GoodlatteRobert (Bob) William GoodlatteTrump, GOP launch full-court press on compromise immigration measure Meadows gets heated with Ryan on House floor The Hill's 12:30 Report - Sponsored by Delta Air Lines - Trump says he will sign 'something' to end family separations MORE (R-Va.), the main sponsor of a House bill that includes similar proposals at that White House meeting, called to discuss a bipartisan agreement reached by Sens. Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinDemocrats protest Trump's immigration policy from Senate floor Live coverage: FBI chief, Justice IG testify on critical report Hugh Hewitt to Trump: 'It is 100 percent wrong to separate border-crossing families' MORE (D-Ill.) and Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.). 

The meeting ended without agreement after the president reportedly called certain nations "shithole countries," but the administration has since doubled down on linking immigration to terrorism.

“This report reveals an indisputable sobering reality — our immigration system has undermined our national security and public safety,” said Attorney General Jeff SessionsJefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsDOJ requests military lawyers to help prosecute immigration crimes: report Trump backs down in rare reversal Senate moving ahead with border bill, despite Trump MORE in a statement.

“And the information in this report is only the tip of the iceberg: we currently have terrorism-related investigations against thousands of people in the United States, including hundreds of people who came here as refugees."

The terrorism numbers, however, don't include incidents and convictions of domestic terror, which by most accounts are undertaken mostly by American citizens.

The Justice Department’s counsel for domestic terrorism matters, Thomas Brzozowski, said last week that domestic terrorists are harder to prosecute, as they enjoy greater protections under the Constitution than foreign terrorists, leading to lesser charges.

But Brzozowski added that "the notion that the government takes Islamic extremism more seriously than domestic terrorism is, frankly, not true.”

Administration officials added that the new report does not cover instances of first-generation Americans who have been convicted of terrorism offenses.

"Of course a couple egregious examples of those are the shooter at the Orlando nightclub or the attack in San Bernardino a couple years ago. Those are incidents that were not captured but of course represent a significant threat," said one of the administration officials.

Officials said the departments of Homeland Security and Justice want Congress to end the diversity visa lottery and chain migration, but denied the report's release was intended to coincide with the ongoing debate on DACA, an Obama-era program that shields immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children from deportation.

"Its timing is merely coincidental with the ongoing debate, however we don’t mean to diminish its importance in the issues that it highlights in terms of the outcome of that debate in any kind of policy changes or legislative changes," said an administration official.