The Hill
Sunday, July 05, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow A ‘yes’ on bailout doesn’t mean a ‘no’
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
A ‘yes’ on bailout doesn’t mean a ‘no’
Posted: 11/18/08 08:34 PM [ET]

A vote for a bailout wasn’t political suicide, even if there is evidence that it hurt.

Contrary to pre-election worries that a yes vote might equate to the end of a career, the vote didn’t appear to be a pivotal one. Few voted for it and lost, and those who did were already in serious jeopardy.

As lawmakers confront whether or not to bail out the ailing auto industry, a review of the election two weeks ago shows that, despite the thousands upon thousands of letters and phone calls devoted to protesting the $700 billion bailout package in October, their electoral impact was negligible.

The members who survived will soon be faced with another bailout, as the Senate could, by the end of the week, vote on cloture for devoting $25 billion of the original $700 billion to saving the auto industry.

The Big Three automakers testified on Capitol Hill Tuesday, but they are not expected to have enough support for cloture.

Of the 17 House incumbents who lost reelection, only five voted for the bailout. And of those five, one — Rep. Tim Mahoney (D-Fla.) — was undone by a sex scandal, while another — Rep. Christopher Shays (R-Conn.) — didn’t differ with his opponent on the issue.

Meanwhile, endangered members like Reps. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio), Jerry McNerney (D-Calif.) and John Murtha (D-Pa.) all voted for the bill and survived with relative ease.

Two of three Senate incumbents to lose reelection so far — Sens. John Sununu (R-N.H.) and Gordon Smith (R-Ore.) — voted for it, but their races already favored Democrats when the bailout vote was held in early October.

Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), meanwhile, survived a tight race in spite of his vote, and he could soon be joined by Sens. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) and Norm Coleman (R-Minn.), who voted yes and are favored in races that remain undecided.

The majority of the most endangered House members voted against the original bailout, but a fair amount rolled the dice by voting yes.

Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.) was thought to be in a toss-up race heading into Election Day. And as the second-ranking member on the Financial Services Committee — who also voted for both House iterations of the bailout — he was particularly susceptible to a bailout-related downfall.

In the final weeks of the campaign, independent polling consistently showed his opponent, Hazleton Mayor Lou Barletta (R), with a slight lead in the race, but Kanjorski won 52-48 — this despite Barletta running ads on the issue and hitting Kanjorski on it at debates.


 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.