The Hill
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Aides’ private info exposed
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Aides’ private info exposed
Posted: 04/02/08 07:55 PM [ET]

Furious senior House aides are demanding committee action against a website that has posted their bank account numbers, signatures, home addresses and children’s names that are included in financial disclosure documents.

Some are demanding legal action against the website LegiStorm, which since February has been posting congressional documents online as a way to increase transparency in government. Aides have brought their complaints to the House Administration Committee and the clerk of the House.

Staffers, however, are unsatisfied so far and say they may protest by refusing to turn in personal disclosure forms by the May 15 deadline. They worry the online information could lead to identify theft or their being targeted by criminals, and some are pleading for intervention from lawyers at the House General Counsel’s office.

“No one has a problem with disclosure,” said Jeff Loveing, chief of staff to Rep. Bill Shuster (R-Pa.). “What we’re talking about is a concern for our safety, our financial safety and our children’s safety,” he said. “I’ve researched identity theft and how much of a goldmine this information is for people who deal in that world.”

Loveing argued that the House and Senate could have a “liability problem” if someone used the information to commit a crime.

Aides complained about LegiStorm during a meeting earlier this week of the House Chiefs of Staff Association, attended by representatives from the clerk’s office and staffers from the ethics committee along with 30 senior aides.

Some aides said they are livid House Administration has not at least threatened legal action against LegiStorm, which they say should be prohibited by law from using the information because it is a for-profit company.

“If any federal agency had so poorly protected thousands of sensitive personal files, they would have been called up for a full investigation by [Government and Oversight Committee Chairman] Henry Waxman [D-Calif.],” remarked one senior GOP aide.

LegiStorm founder Jock Friedly has refused to remove the names of children, home addresses and staffers’ signatures. In defending his company, he said it is up to the House and Senate to remove information from the forms if it is sensitive.

“If they fell down on their jobs, it’s not our fault,” he said.


 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.