The Hill
Thursday, November 20, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Banks move splits GOP, right wing
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Banks move splits GOP, right wing
Posted: 10/14/08 07:41 PM [ET]

A dramatic shift in the Bush administration’s economic rescue to purchase preferred stock in the nation’s banks has received cautious approval from congressional leaders while sparking anger among some conservatives.

Democratic leaders praised Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s newest plan, which resembled an idea circulated on Capitol Hill earlier this month by billionaire financier George Soros. Under Paulson’s proposal, Treasury would invest $250 billion in banks to help them begin lending again and in return would receive preferred stock and warrants for common stock.

The investments would give the federal government as much as a 20 percent stake in the nation’s largest banks, although several experts said the ownership positions would likely end within a period of five years.

Some Republicans slammed Paulson for taking a major step toward socializing the American financial system.

“When a private asset is purchased by the government, it is an asset that has been socialized,” said Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (Mich.), chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee and a member of the Financial Services Committee.

But other GOP leaders said Tuesday that Paulson’s plan included safeguards against government control of banks because its stake would be in the form of non-voting shares.

“The government won’t be running the banks, but making an investment,” said House Republican Whip Roy Blunt (Mo.).

The split in the party comes as some members question the cost of bailing out banks that took costly risks.

Some say the move calls to mind earlier government takeovers, such as Britain’s nationalization of its coal industry in the 1940s and its airline industry in the 1970s.

“It stinks,” said Andy Roth, the director of government affairs at the Club for Growth, a conservative advocacy group that promotes smaller government and lower taxes.

“What’s astonishing is that the administration is a Republican administration and their bedrock principle is supposed to be tax cuts. They’re picking socialism over pro-growth tax cuts. It shows how far we’ve come as a party.”

Democratic leaders applauded the move, whereby the federal government would buy $25 billion of preferred stock in Citigroup, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo, giving Uncle Sam between 15 percent and 55 percent of those firms’ shareholder equity. Treasury would buy $10 billion stakes in Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. It would spend $125 billion for shares in thousands of smaller banks.

“After weeks of turmoil in the financial markets, I am pleased that the administration is now acting more aggressively to address this crisis,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that Democrats had first pushed for a direct injection of capital into the banking system through equity purchases but were rebuffed by Paulson.


 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.