|
Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) called on Sen. Joe Lieberman
(I-Conn.) to apologize for his attacks on Barack Obama, saying doing so would temporarily
let him retain a key chairmanship position next Congress. Bayh warned that stripping Lieberman of his chairmanship
position on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee could
prompt the Democrats’ 2000 vice presidential nominee to side with the GOP on
close votes next Congress or resign his Senate seat. If he resigns, Connecticut’s
Republican Gov. Jodi Rell would replace Lieberman with a temporary two-year
appointment, likely a GOP senator.
“We can take away his chairmanship, that’s something we
have the right to do,” Bayh said on MSNBC. “What you will have at that point is
someone who may very well resign, or someone is embittered ... who might not be
with us on some of these key votes.”
Bayh said that Lieberman must first issue a “sincere
apology” for campaign attacks warning of the perils of an Obama presidency and
a large Democratic majority in Congress. He said Democrats should allow him to
keep his chairmanship on the condition that he would not use his subpoena power
and influence as chairman to undermine Obama’s presidency. Otherwise, Democrats
would take away his gavel at any point next Congress, Bayh warned.
Bayh said Democrats should tell Lieberman sternly, “Look,
we’re giving you a chance here, but if you don’t do the right things as
chairman, and we see any continuation of this kind of behavior ...the game is
up at that point.”
Lieberman’s fate will be put to a test next Tuesday, when
the Democratic Caucus is expected to hold a secret vote to decide whether he
should continue to serve as chairman, or face lesser punishment for his outspoken
advocacy for Sen. John McCain’s (Ariz.) presidential bid, including a prime
speaking spot at the Republican National Convention.
After his election last week, Obama called Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and told him that he wants Lieberman to
remain in the Democratic Caucus, a call that has been echoed by several senior
Democrats. Democrats know that taking Lieberman's gavel away will most likely
prompt him to leave the Democratic Caucus and organize with Republicans, a
situation they are trying to avoid since they lack a filibuster-proof majority.
“In the last 36-48 hours, there is emerging desire for
the top priority to keep him in the caucus,” one Democratic aide said. “Whereas
a week or two months ago, it seemed like everybody was thirsting for blood and
demanding his gavel.”
At the same time, Democrats don’t want to appear
weak-kneed in dealing with a renegade member of their party who launched
attacks against Obama and the Democratic Party throughout the contentious
presidential campaign.
One option is to allow him to remain chairman of the
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, but strip him of his
seniority on the Armed Services Committee. Lieberman, whose hawkish stance on
the Iraq war began to strain his alliance with the Democratic Party, is in line
to become chairman of the Armed Services Committee, if Sen. Carl Levin
(D-Mich.) steps down from his post. If Levin leaves, the next most senior
members are Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.), but their
health casts doubt on their ability to run the high-profile committee.
He also is the third most senior Democratic Caucus member
to sit on the Environment and Public Works Committee, but his position falls in
line with Democrats on environmental issues. He also sits on the Small Business
Committee, and is in line to take that chairmanship as well.
Bayh said that allowing Lieberman to stay in the caucus
and keep his chairmanship would be the best way to advance Obama's ambitious
agenda next Congress.
“I honestly think we have a better chance of getting
unity ... if we try to have some reconciliation here, rather than resorting to
revenge right off the bat,” Bayh said.
|