The Hill
Monday, July 06, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Begich grows lead, gives Dems hopes for 58
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Begich grows lead, gives Dems hopes for 58
Posted: 11/15/08 01:11 PM [ET]

Anchorage mayor Mark Begich (D) increased his lead over Republican Sen. Ted Stevens (Alaska) to 1,022 votes as of late Friday, giving Democrats hope of raising their Senate majority to 58 seats.

State officials suspended their tally for the weekend and are scheduled to begin counting the remaining absentee and provisional ballots early next week.

Campaign officials estimate that there are about 25,000 ballots left to count, including about 15,000 absentee and provisional ballots from the Anchorage area and nearly 10,000 absentee ballots from the Kenai Peninsula and Juneau.

Democrats say they are confident about the race because, since election officials began counting nearly 90,000 absentee and provisional ballots at the start of the week, Begich has erased a more-than 3,000-vote deficit.

Democrats argue that Begich has taken the lead since the counting of absentee ballots because many of his supporters were encouraged to vote early.

“The Democrats were very aggressive with early-vote efforts,” said Begich spokeswoman Julie Hasquet. “We had super-aggressive canvass efforts across the state to get people out voting early.”

The Alaska race now seems the best opportunity for Democrats to pick up their 58th seat in the Senate. They also have a chance of capturinf Republican Sen. Norm Coleman’s seat in Minnesota.
Coleman leads by 206 votes out of nearly 3 million votes cast. The Republican led by 725 votes on Nov. 4 but watched his lead shrink after state election officials counted missed ballots and double-checked their totals.

A laborious hand recount of all ballots is set to begin next week and may take weeks to complete.

Democrats have a smaller possibility of winning the seat now held by Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss (Ga.). Chambliss failed to win over 50 percent of the vote in his race against Democrat Jim Martin. State law requires the two candidates to square off again in a runoff scheduled for Dec. 2.

A major question for Democrats in Georgia is whether they can still mobilize as many African-American voters in December without President-elect Barack Obama on the ticket. African-Americans voted overwhelmingly for Obama and other Democratic candidates on Nov. 4.

Senate Democrats view 58 as a crucial number in the Senate because it would give them enough votes, when combined with Maine’s two liberal Republican senators, to quash obstructionist Republican procedural tactics.

Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Olympia Snowe (Maine) are considered the most likely to vote with Democrats on procedural votes that need to be cleared to pass controversial legislation. Some conservative activists believe, for example, that it would be useless to attempt to filibuster liberal judicial nominees if Democrats control 58 seats because they expect Collins and Snowe to vote with the majority often.

Control of 58 seats will also give Democrats a strong chance to pass the controversial Employee Free Choice Act. The legislation is a top priority for labor groups but hated by business interests because it would make it much easier for labor activists to organize unions. It would allow labor activists to organize without holding secret ballot elections.

 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.