The Hill
Friday, July 03, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Bush sends updated Iraq supplemental to Congress
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Bush sends updated Iraq supplemental to Congress
Posted: 10/22/07 03:58 PM [ET]

President Bush on Monday submitted a $196.4 billion supplemental spending bill to Congress that would fund military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2008.

Of the sum, $150.5 billion had been included in a previous request, while $45.9 billion is part of an amendment. The bulk of the total funds, nearly $190 billion, would go to the Department of Defense, while the State Department would get $6.9 billion.

“Parts of this war are complicated, but one part is not, and that is America should do what it takes to support our troops and protect our people,” Bush said.

“I know some in Congress are against the war, and are seeking ways to demonstrate that opposition,” he added. “I recognize their position, and they should make their views heard. But they ought to make sure our troops have what it takes to succeed.”

Bush argued that the troops should not be “caught in the middle of partisan disagreements in Washington, D.C.,” adding, “I often hear that war critics oppose my decisions, but still support the troops. Well, I’ll take them at their word — and this is the chance to show it, that they support the troops.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) urged quick passage of the supplemental.

“We cannot turn our backs on our warriors now by cutting off funds when there is still work to be done and still troops to protect,” he said. “Congress overwhelmingly passed two resolutions this year rejecting any action that would undermine our troops in the field, and Congress must now fulfill its responsibilities and send the message to our troops that we support their mission.”

However, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) indicated that Congress would give the funding bill a close look.

“President Bush wants us to rubber-stamp another $200 billion in war funds — all borrowed money, none of it paid for — for next year alone,” Reid said. “But when we sent a bipartisan SCHIP bill to his desk to provide health insurance for the children of working families, the president called it too expensive.” Reid referred to a bill expanding the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, which Bush vetoed. The House failed to override the veto last week.

Reid added that Congress would take time to hold the funding request “up to the light of day and fight for the change in strategy and redeployment of troops that is long overdue.”

 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.