The Hill
Thursday, January 08, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Byrd preempts gop on earmark disclosure
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Byrd preempts gop on earmark disclosure
Posted: 04/17/07 08:05 PM [ET]
The Senate Appropriations Committee will begin adhering to earmark-disclosure rules that were approved earlier this year but have yet to be signed into law, heading off a Republican effort to pass the rules, Chairman Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) announced yesterday.

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) and four GOP colleagues moved to pass the earmark-disclosure standards officially by unanimous consent yesterday after informing Democratic leaders of their plans. Democrats objected and cited Byrd’s announcement, which was sent minutes before the Republicans made their request.

Under Byrd’s new edict, senators will begin the 2008 appropriations cycle by identifying earmarks in all bills and committee reports, using the earmark standards crafted by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and attached to the Senate ethics bill by DeMint. The recipients and purpose of earmarks will be specified, and senators will be required to certify their lack of financial interest in earmarked projects.

DeMint called the Appropriations announcement “really good news” that should not prevent the Senate’s earmark rules from becoming official. “If appropriators want to comply, there’s no reason at all why we shouldn’t enact this rule as a Senate rule,” DeMint said on the floor.

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) objected on behalf of the majority, asking for more time to conference statutory ethics changes with the House. “We believe that […] taking it piece by piece is not the best way to accomplish our goals,” Durbin said.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.