The Hill
Friday, December 05, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow CBC members call Obama-Clinton feud overblown, but cite concerns
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
CBC members call Obama-Clinton feud overblown, but cite concerns
Posted: 01/17/08 07:44 AM [ET]

Congressional Black Caucus members say they have moved beyond the dust-up between Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.) – which they feel has been overblown — but some admit that feelings are still raw.

Rep. Lacy Clay (D-Mo.) said he expects the matter to come up at the weekly caucus meeting Thursday.

Clay told The Hill he has heard from many constituents disappointed with the Clintons and the comments of their surrogates.

“Now the veneer has come off people like [Black Entertainment Television founder] Bob Johnson, who felt compelled to make statements that might bring down the one candidate who can expand upon the dream and advance the civil rights movement,” Clay said.

Some charge that Johnson implicitly criticized Obama for using drugs, which the senator admitted trying when he was younger.

Clay added that voters will decide how the debate over race mattered.

“I think the chips will fall where they may and the dust will settle over time,” he said.

Caucus spokeswoman Keiana Barrett said that the caucus will discuss a host of issues at its meeting, one of which could be the presidential race and the CBC-sponsored Democratic debate next Monday. Barrett noted that the caucus itself has not endorsed a candidate, allowing individual members to support whomever they choose.

Of the caucus’s 41 House members, 16 are supporting Obama, 15 are supporting Clinton and three are supporting former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.). Obama is the only senator in the caucus.

Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.), the caucus’s second vice chairman and a Clinton supporter, told The Hill he has also heard from constituents about statements out of the Clinton and Obama camps. Speaking to one constituent concerned and confused over attacks against Obama, Cleaver said he likened the dissension among Democrats to something the Ku Klux Klan would have engineered.

“The Klan could not have devised a better plan to get African-Americans to attack African-Americans than those who have served as the architects of this discord,” Cleaver told her. When asked who he thought was responsible, he said he did not know but added that people in the media knew the culprits.

Cleaver and other caucus members, however, also emphasized that they and other Democrats would get past this.

Rep. Artur Davis (D-Ala.), an Obama supporter, said that Democrats should be focusing on the historic nature of having a woman and an African-American contend for the presidency.

“One of them is going to shatter one of the strongest historical barriers,” he said.  “We ought to be celebrating this.”

Davis said that while personal criticism by Clinton surrogates like Johnson has not been helpful, it was not appropriate to criticize the Clintons, who have been strong civil rights supporters.

Rep. Danny Davis (D-Ill.), the caucus’s secretary and another Obama backer, said he did not think that the caucus had to do anything more to tamp down tensions between caucus members and the candidates, who agreed to a truce Monday.

“Different members are supporting different candidates,” he said. “It has not erupted into a big deal.

“Whether Martin Luther King did more than Lyndon Johnson, or Lyndon Johnson did more than Martin Luther King, that’s not what the campaigns are arguing right now,” he added. “Without both of them, it would have happened.” 

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.