The Hill
Friday, December 05, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Clinton-era officials fault Army readiness
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Clinton-era officials fault Army readiness
Posted: 08/02/06 12:00 AM [ET]

Several Clinton-era administration officials have sent a letter to Democratic leaders in Congress expressing deep concern over the Army’s combat readiness.

William Perry, the former secretary of defense, and Madeleine Albright, former secretary of state, plus others who served the 42nd president said that they learned that two-thirds of the Army’s operating force, both active-duty and reserve, is reporting as unready.

“The bottom line is that our Army currently has no ready, strategic reserve,” the former officials wrote. The officials are part of the National Security Advisory Group chaired by Perry.

“Not since the Vietnam era and its aftermath has the Army’s readiness been so degraded,” they said in their letter to Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

Not having a strategic reserve is “particularly dangerous” at a time when the United States is engaged in a global effort to counter terrorism and is facing crises in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Iran and North Korea, the letter said.

“The lack of a ready strategic reserve in our Army weakens our ability to deter undesired actions by these nations, as well as our ability to respond effectively to such actions,” the former officials wrote.

The National Security Advisory Group blasted the Bush administration, saying it has underfunded the Army. “Remarkably, the Office of Management and Budget recently cut the Army’s request for FY06 supplemental appropriations by $4.9 billion, undermining the Army’s efforts to ‘get well’ after substantial equipment degradation and losses in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom,” they wrote. “We believe this constitutes a serious failure of civilian stewardship of the military.”

Sens. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) released the letter yesterday. They are working on an amendment that they plan to introduce as part of the defense spending bill. Their amendment would increase the $50 billion bridge fund that pays for operations as part of the war on terrorism by $10.2 billion to restore Army and Marine Corps equipment damaged by war.

 

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.