The Hill
Wednesday, July 09, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Cockfighting bill blocked by NRA objections
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Cockfighting bill blocked by NRA objections
Posted: 03/21/07 06:50 PM [ET]
House leaders pulled a popular bill that seeks to curb animal fights after the National Rifle Association (NRA) objected to how the bill was brought to the floor.

The bill, which has 303 cosponsors, would make it a felony to knowingly sponsor or exhibit animals for the purpose of a fight if the animals were transported across state lines. Doing so is currently against the law, but it is only a misdemeanor violation. Under the bill, violators would face fines or up to three years in prison.

One target for bill sponsors was the practice of cockfighting, which is banned in 49 states, with Louisiana the holdout.
The Judiciary Committee passed the bill. The Agriculture Committee, which shared jurisdiction, discharged the measure,
which left it free to go to the House floor for a vote.

Because of the bill’s support, leaders put it on the suspension calendar, which is generally reserved for non-controversial measures.

Members of the Agriculture Committee, however, apparently went to House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) to express jurisdictional concerns after the NRA raised objections.

NRA chief lobbyist Chris W. Cox said the lack of review in the Agriculture Committee was “unorthodox” and could set a “dangerous precedent” relating to each committee’s jurisdiction. He said the group has not opposed the substance of the bill.
The bill includes language that references the purchase, sale, transport and delivery of animals for the purpose of staging animal fights. But the bill would amend Title 18 of the U.S. code, the section that establishes what is a crime and the process for penalizing lawbreakers.

The NRA argued, however, that provisions of the bill should amend Title 7 of the U.S. code, which covers the handling of livestock and other agriculture issues.

Title 18 does include a section that prohibits hunting or fishing in wildlife refuges and using motor vehicles or aircraft to hunt wild horses, as well as other crimes relating to the treatment of animals.

Michael Markarian, an executive vice president for the Humane Society of the United States and a chief supporter of the bill, said he believes the NRA “just wants to get in the way of an animal welfare bill.”

Markarian said that the NRA, upset at the success the Humane Society has had at the state level — including the adoption in Michigan of a law that bans dove-hunting — was now “looking for payback.”

Despite the last-minute controversy, both sides said the measure would likely be back on the floor soon — either today or next week.
 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.