The Hill
Monday, October 06, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Conyers wants unredacted documents from Goodling
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Conyers wants unredacted documents from Goodling
Posted: 05/22/07 03:52 PM [ET]

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) wants more information than Monica Goodling, a former senior aide to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, is willing to provide when she testifies before Conyers’s panel Wednesday.

John Dowd, Goodling’s attorney, said his client refuses to hand over unredacted documents related to the firings of U.S. attorneys last year because they are official Department of Justice (DoJ) documents and she does not have the department’s permission to do so.

That response was not sufficient for Conyers, who demanded in a follow-up letter that Goodling, who has resigned in the wake of the U.S. attorney scandal, comply fully with the committee’s subpoena.

Dowd wrote Conyers to let him know that Goodling will only provide CDs that the department has given her. He cited federal law that limits the ability of government employees and former employees to hand over official documents in response to subpoenas.

“Accordingly, to the extent the Committee wishes to take issue with the limited production Ms. Goodling intends to make on Wednesday, we respectfully request that the Committee address its concerns, if any, to the Department of Justice,” Dowd wrote. “Ms. Goodling will of course produce any records that the Department of Justice authorizes her to produce.”

In his response, Conyers disagreed with Dowd’s assessment, arguing that those protections apply only to information asked for in connection to a state or federal court proceeding and “by their own terms would not apply to the production of material to a Congressional committee conducting an authorized oversight investigation.”

Conyers also took issue with Dowd’s contention that federal law prevents former officials from handing over government documents, arguing that it only applies to current employees.

He also argued that the House subpoena power should trump any internal agency regulations.

“We are aware of no authority that permits an internal Department administrative regulation to allow a former employee of the Department of Justice, or any other person, to avoid the subpoena power of the House of Representatives,” Conyers wrote.

In closing, Conyers called on Dowd and Goodling to reconsider her “stated intention not to comply with this Committee’s subpoena.”

The House Judiciary Committee previously negotiated an immunity deal with Goodling that would allow her to testify and prevent any legal recourse for information provided during that testimony.
 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.