The Hill
Friday, December 05, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Court holds off on contempt charges until next year
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Court holds off on contempt charges until next year
Posted: 10/06/08 07:37 PM [ET]

A federal appeals court on Monday punted a decision about whether two of President Bush’s top aides must testify before a congressional committee until next year — and the next administration.

The delay is a setback for House Democrats who held White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers in contempt of Congress for failing to respond to subpoenas for information about the firings of nine U.S. attorneys in 2006. Democrats were trying to find out if politics played an improper role in their removal.

Democrats then filed suit to enforce the contempt charges, but time will run out on this year’s congressional session before the constitutional showdown between the executive and legislative branches will be resolved.

The ruling by a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said even if expedited, the case could not be fully resolved before this Congress ends on Jan. 3.

“At that time, the 110th House of Representatives will cease to exist as a legal entity, and the subpoenas it has issued will expire,” wrote the panel of judges, two of whom were appointed by Republicans.

“In view of the above considerations, we see no reason to set the appeal,” the panel concluded. “If the case becomes moot, we would be wasting the time of the court and the parties.”

Monday’s decision prevents a July order by U.S. District Judge John Bates that would have forced Miers to testify before the House Judiciary panel and Bolten to at least turn over documents to the committee.

An internal investigation by the Department of Justice’s inspector general recently found “substantial” evidence that politics played an important role in the prosecutors’ firings. Miers, Bolten and other top White House aides did not cooperate with the probe.

Attorney General Michael Mukasey appointed Nora Dannehy, a federal prosecutor from Connecticut, as a special prosecutor charged with investigating the probe’s findings.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) and subcommittee Chairmen Robert “Bobby” Scott (D-Va.) and Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.) wrote Mukasey on Monday, seeking information about what powers Dannehy will have to investigate and how independent she can be.

The Democrats also urged Mukasey to provide a public accounting of the investigation.

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, urged House Democrats to drop their suit.

“Rather than continue to waste the American people’s time and money, I hope that next year House Democrats put partisan politics aside and focus on a real agenda that serves the American people,” Smith said in a statement.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.