The Hill
Sunday, July 05, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow D.C. court nullifies FEC regulations
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
D.C. court nullifies FEC regulations
Posted: 09/13/07 07:20 PM [ET]
A D.C. District Court judge on Wednesday threw out existing Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations on coordinated communications, voter registration and get-out-the-vote activity, arguing that the agency’s interpretation did not meet a “reasoned decision-making” standard and undermined the law.

The FEC can either appeal the decision or rewrite regulations so they comport with the judge’s findings.

The decision by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly stems from the FEC’s implementation of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) and from assertions by the bill’s authors in Congress that the agency is interpreting many provisions too loosely. As a result, they argue, the law’s intent is undermined.

Rep. Christopher Shays (R-Conn.), along with former Rep. Marty Meehan (D-Mass.), sued the FEC over the new regulations, while their counterparts in the Senate, John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), followed with an amicus brief.

BCRA supporters hailed Wednesday’s decision and said there was no reason why members of Congress should be forced to sue the FEC to make the agency implement laws Congress passes.

They also accused the FEC of abusing its powers by taking actions that gut the law rather than enforce it effectively as written.

“The agency’s continued actions are a blight on our democratic process,” said Gerald Hebert, executive director of the Campaign Legal Center. “Fortunately, courts have repeatedly stepped in to protect the process.”

Hebert said it was not just a matter of FEC incompetence but also a demonstration of an inherent problem with the structure of the commission itself: Commissioners are selected by their party for party loyalty.

The decision’s opponents were equally passionate in reacting to the ruling, arguing that it impedes on free-speech rights.
“The decision chills permissible speech by eliminating clear rules and bright lines regulating coordinated content and product,” said Stephen Hoersting, vice president of the Center for Competitive Politics, which opposes BCRA.
 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.