The Hill
Monday, July 07, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Democrats cite progress on Webb amendment
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Democrats cite progress on Webb amendment
Posted: 09/16/07 12:03 PM [ET]
Democrats on Sunday indicated that they are in the process of building support for language that would give troops longer rest periods, and Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) said he hopes enough votes can be found to override a presidential veto.

The measure, championed by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), would require troops to get as much downtime at home as they spent in Iraq. A consequence of the legislation, Democrats hope, will be that the current troop levels in Iraq cannot be sustained.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Sunday that he would recommend that President Bush veto any such language, meaning it would take 67 votes in the Senate to pass it over the White House objections. The last time it was up for a vote, the measure failed to get the 60 votes necessary to overcome a GOP filibuster.

But Democrats believe that support is building.

“Right now, Senator Webb’s amendment, I would guess, has at least 57 votes, on a bipartisan basis,” said Reed on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos. “We want to move and move forward, pick up the votes. This process is sometimes too slow, but it’s a process that I think is going in the right direction. We’re picking up support. And I think on this issue, we can pick up sufficient votes -- 60, I hope 67.”

Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) acknowledged that the Democrats do not have enough votes to override a veto but said this should not prevent them from fighting to pass the legislation.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.