The Hill
Friday, May 16, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Democrats grill Mukasey
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Democrats grill Mukasey
Posted: 01/30/08 07:21 PM [ET]

Attorney General Michael Mukasey said Wednesday he believed the Justice Department had previously instituted a policy that would give President Bush the last word on waterboarding.

Mukasey acknowledged that the president is part of a three-step approval process on harsh interrogation techniques, speaking during a tense hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. He also outlined the process in a letter to the panel’s chairman, Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), released Tuesday night.

Mukasey stopped short of saying Bush actually gave the call on the controversial practice. But the disclosure drew the attention of Democrats and could be significant because the Bush administration had previously acknowledged that the simulated drowning technique was used on a handful of people soon after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. If the president gave his endorsement to waterboarding, he may have authorized a practice in violation of anti-torture laws, Democrats say.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), one of six Democrats to vote to confirm Mukasey last fall, was surprised to learn about the president’s potential role in approving waterboarding. She said this was the first time such a “defined process” had been disclosed. She pressed Mukasey to answer whether the process had been in effect previously.

“I believe this has always been the case,” Mukasey said. “I mean, I’m not — I should take a step back. I’m not authorized to say what happened in the past, but I wasn’t told — I was told [the process] wasn’t news.”

His testimony Wednesday marked the first time Mukasey appeared before the panel since his 2007 confirmation hearings. Once again, Mukasey refrained from answering direct questions on waterboarding, leaving Democrats frustrated.

Mukasey’s vague answers on waterboarding last fall nearly derailed his nomination, with the Senate ultimately confirming him by a 53-40 vote — a narrower margin than that of his controversial predecessor, Alberto Gonzales.

On Wednesday, Feinstein pressed Mukasey further. She said “it is widely alleged” that at least three people had been waterboarded in the past.


 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.